Nov 072009
 

Every time I turn on the TV it seems that there’s another ad shilling a so-called “free” credit report offer.  They are just as free as the GOP is compassionate.  However, you can get an annual credit report from all three agencies for free.

internet-scams Ben Stein was axed by the New York Times last year for ethics violations when he appeared in a commercial for a bait and switch credit report scam. The ad claimed that consumers could get a free credit report, but in reality, they had to pay to see the real numbers.

Well, the FTC is now getting into the act and going after similar companies with some catchy commercials intended to emulate those of a popular advertising campaign by a similar bait and switch scam:

AnnualCreditReport.com is the ONLY authorized source to get your free annual credit report under federal law. The Fair Credit Reporting Act guarantees you access to a free credit report from each of the three nationwide reporting agencies — Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion — every twelve months. The Federal Trade Commission has received complaints from consumers who thought they were ordering their free annual credit report, but instead paid hidden fees or agreed to unwanted services. Don’t be fooled by TV ads, email offers, or online search results. Go to the authorized source when you request your free report. Read on…

Inserted from <Crooks and Liars>

It can be very difficult to find the real one lost in the sea of scams, so if you didn’t already know where to go, now you do.

Share
Oct 292009
 

Hey, I like baseball as much as the next guy, but the behavior of more extreme fans never ceases to amaze me.

STIX28aTG Let’s say that you’re a woman, and you’re a die hard fan of the home team. And let’s further stipulate that you’re not a season ticket holder, and you don’t have hundreds of dollars to buy a pair of tickets for yourself and your spouse, even for the cheap seats at the local stadium. What to do, what to do? How about placing an advertisement on Craig’s List, and hope that a sympathetic person who has a couple of spare tickets will help you out?

So, you’re writing the ad. After all, you’re the assistant director of communications at a local medical facility, and like any good ad copy writer, you know one thing for sure: “sexy” sells, and gets attention (particularly on Craig’s List). You settle on the following, and hit the submit button:

DESPERATE BLONDE NEEDS WS TIX!

Diehard Phillies fan – gorgeous tall buxom blonde – in desperate need of two World Series Tickets. Price negotiable. I’m the creative type! Maybe we can help each other!

Flirtatious? Perhaps. Solicitation? Hardly. But that’s what a vice cop in Bensalem, Pa. apparently thought when he read Susan Finkelstein’s advertisement in the ticket section of Philadelphia Craig’s List.

The cop responded to the ad, and set up a meeting with Finkelstein at a local bar. And busted her for prostitution.

Allegedly, Finkelstein crossed some type of arbitrary line, and offered (or implied) that she’d be willing to perform sex acts on the cop and his brother in exchange for two tickets. She was cuffed, booked, and her mug shot is now popping up all over the web…

Inserted from <Alternet>

The Phillies and Yankees are favorite teams of mine.  We got our first TV when I was ten and the Phillies were the team I saw.  Robin Roberts was my hero.  Later on, I learned that I could buy a round trip ticket from Atlantic City to Yankee Stadium, buy a decent ticket, and have a couple hot dogs and cokes for under $10.  I was in the stadium (it took three trips) when Roger Maris hit #61.  So this series is rich in memories for me, but seriously?!!?  Not even for Bronco’s tickets to the Super Bowl!

On the other hand, didn’t that cop have anything better to do, and what does he have against the Phillies?

Life is often funnier that anything I could invent.

Share
Oct 252009
 

Arizona will be farming out the management of its death row facilities to CCA (Corporate Corrections of America).

prison The State of Arizona, seeking to close a $2 billion budget gap, is planning to open bidding on all but one of its prison facilities.

Included in the offerings to private firms is an opportunity to manage the captivity of those condemned to die: a move that, for the first time ever, would put a U.S. state’s death row in corporate hands, according to The New York Times.

"While executions would still be performed by the state, officials said, the Department of Corrections would relinquish all other day-to-day operations to the private operator and pay a per-diem fee for each prisoner," the Times added…

Inserted from <Raw Story>

Given my history as an ex-convict and and prison volunteer, I’m quite familiar with CCA and know many men who have been imprisoned in their facilities.  They manage prisons as well as private contractors managed VA hospitals, if you remember those scandals.  Given CCA’s long and well known track record for malfeasance, mismanagement, and prisoner abuse, Arizona may be trying to cut down on the number of executions they perform, as fewer death row prisoners will survive until their execution date.

Share
Oct 212009
 

Here’s one for our Canadian readers.  News of Canada rarely finds its way this far south.

TarSands The provincial government in Alberta, Canada is threatening to unleash its counterterrorism plan if activists continue using civil disobedience to protest the tar sands, Canada’s fastest source of greenhouse gas emissions.

In recent weeks, Greenpeace has staged three daring protests inside tar sands mines, temporarily shutting down parts of the world’s largest energy project. On Oct. 3 and 4, activists blocked construction of an upgrader needed to refine heavy tar sands oil, belonging to Shell in Ft. Saskatchewan, Alberta.

Civil disobedience from Greenpeace, leading to 37 arrests, has enraged Alberta’s conservative government. "We’re coddling people who are breaking the law," complained Premier Ed Stelmach during a media scrum in early October.

"Premier Stelmach’s public suggestion that he will use the ‘force of the law to deal with these people’ confirms his lack of knowledge of the limits of his authority and the clear rule that our system of justice cannot be interfered with or manipulated for political reasons," responded Brian Beresh, the defence lawyer representing arrested activists, at a news conference in Edmonton.

Legal scholars, including University of Alberta law professor Sanjiv Anand and Tom Engel of the Criminal Trial Lawyers Association, have criticized the provincial government for attempting to politicize legal proceedings.

"We’re going to be working very closely with industry and our solicitor general will be reviewing all of the guidelines we have in place," said a visibly irritated Premier Stelmach in early October.

Fred Lindsay, the solicitor general, went a step further, suggesting the province might use its counterterrorism plan against future protests… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Common Dreams>

The protestors are breaking the law.  Nobody denies that.  Therefore the Alberta government has every right to prosecute.  That’s the whole point of civil disobedience.  Protestors know in advance that their actions are subject to punishment and are willing to face the just consequences, making examples of themselves to draw attention to their cause.  However, they are not terrorists.  They have harmed nobody.  They have merely interfered with the operations of a huge corporation that does not care how much environmental damage they do to make a profit.  To treat them as terrorists would be an outrage.

Share

Is There Devolution?

 Posted by at 1:35 am  Uncategorized
Oct 072009
 

Can evolution run backward?  Scientists say no.

…But, until recently, scientists had never really tested the biological law — first proposed in 1905 — that evolution couldn’t run in reverse. No one expects whole organisms to mutate back into their evolutionary antecedents. But what about the proteins we’re made up of? Under the right circumstances, can they find their way back in time?
The answer, it turns out, is no.
A University of Oregon research team has tried, in essence, to return a protein — called a glucocorticoid receptor — to one of its ancestral states by reversing the mutations that produced the modern version of the receptor. They discovered that the mutations happened in two stages — two separate groups of mutations. The trouble, they report in the current issue of Nature, was that each separate cluster of mutations produced a dead receptor, no matter which one was chosen first. In other words, there was no way the protein could select a preferable state that would lead it, in nature, toward its ancestral form.
Evolution opens gateways into the future. But it appears to close them — firmly — behind it as well.

Inserted from <NY Times>
But sometimes scientists are just plain wrong.  Devolution does exist, and here’s the proof!
bushidiot

Share
Oct 042009
 

There has long been a secret agreement between the US and Israel, concerning Israel’s nuclear weapons.  I had hoped that the Obama administration would change that as part of the openness Obama promised us during his campaign.  Sadly, I was disappointed.

israel_nuke Barack Obama, the US president, has agreed to abide by a 40-year policy of allowing Israel to keep nuclear weapons without opening them to international inspection, according to a US newspaper.

In a report on Saturday, The Washington Times quoted three unnamed sources as saying Obama had confirmed to Binyamin Netanyahu, Israel’s prime minister, that he would maintain the "don’t ask, don’t tell" policy.

The incident reportedly occurred when the two met at the White House in Washington DC in May.

Neither Israel’s embassy in Washington, nor the White House National Security Council would comment on the claim.

Avner Cohen, an Israeli expert and author, was quoted by the paper as saying that under the deal "the United States passively [accepts] Israel’s nuclear weapons status as long as Israel does not unveil publicly its capability or test a weapon".

There is no official accounting of the deal, supposedly agreed in 1969 between Richard Nixon, then US president, and Golda Meir, the Israeli prime minister at the time… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Common Dreams>

Don’t ask, don’t tell is a lousy way to run our military.  It requires LGBT service personnel to live a lie in order to serve our nation in the military.  A standard of openness requires that they be able to serve with honor without having to hide their sexuality.

In the same way, don’t ask, don’t tell is a lousy way to run our international relations.  A standard of openness requires a level playing field for all participants.  How can we be taken seriously, when we demand that North Korea give up or that Iran not develop nuclear weapons when we look the other way at Israel’s nukes?

Furthermore, this policy poisons our relationships with the Muslim world.  When Muslim countries consider this this policy, they believe, with just cause, that the US considers them second class world citizens, because we give preferential treatment to a nation they consider a foe.  Many of them have to live in Israel’s nuclear shadow, and they are rightly indignant.

Some may argue that Israel, surrounded by enemies, needs nuclear weapons to insure their national security.  However, the US has more than enough power to insure Israel’s security, if we choose to do so, but I can’t see any way that Israel will ever give up nuclear weapons.  I’m not saying we should attempt to force them to do so, just as we have made no such attempts with India or Pakistan.  But why can’t we at least be honest about it?

Share
Oct 012009
 

You’ve heard me complain more than once because the Senate opted to delay Climate Change legislation until next year.  President Obama apparently decided not to wait and has moved ahead without them.

Unwilling to wait for Congress to act, the Obama administration announced on Wednesday that it was moving forward on new rules to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from hundreds of power plants and large industrial facilities.
President Obama has said that he prefers a comprehensive legislative approach to regulating emissions and stemming global warming, not a piecemeal application of rules, and that he is deeply committed to passage of a climate bill this year.
But he has authorized the Environmental Protection Agency to begin moving toward regulation, which could goad lawmakers into reaching an agreement. It could also provide evidence of the United States’ seriousness as negotiators prepare for United Nations talks in Copenhagen in December intended to produce an international agreement to combat global warming.
“We are not going to continue with business as usual,” Lisa P. Jackson, the E.P.A. administrator, said Wednesday in a conference call with reporters. “We have the tools and the technology to move forward today, and we are using them.”
The proposed rules, which could take effect as early as 2011, would place the greatest burden on 400 power plants, new ones and those undergoing substantial renovation, by requiring them to prove that they have applied the best available technology to reduce emissions or face penalties.
Ms. Jackson described the proposal as a common-sense rule tailored to apply to only the largest facilities — those that emit at least 25,000 tons of carbon dioxide a year — which are responsible for nearly 70 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <NY Times>
I certainly applaud this move.  It’s a small step, but a necessary one.  I expect considerable wailing and gnashing of teeth from the right, and to them I say, “Have a little cheese with your whine.”  Now, if only Obama would move ahead and take the lead on a dozen, or so, other issues.

Share
Sep 292009
 

Here is a subject that engenders complete disgust.

Former GOP congressman Tom DeLay is back tonight for week two of ABC’s Dancing With the Stars. Truth be told, we’re still not quite over the shock of DeLay’s debut—all that exaggerated booty shaking, it still haunts us. But it was awesome TV—so awesome, we almost forgot that DeLay is still awaiting trial on charges he broke campaign-finance laws in Texas… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <The Gaggle>

Now, if the thought of it is not sufficient to bile to your throat, this will.

 

Randal!!  Stop that!!!  You’re supposed to be looking at how clumsy Tom Delay is!  Stop looking at the girl!!  Now!!  Randal, pay attention!  Please!!

Anyway, I hope he is as incompetent in court as he is on the dance floor.

Share