Aug 192010
 

Tom122007_Painting_Painting Yesterday evening at 5:51 PM PDT, I watched the gates at the border of Kuwait closing behind the last vehicle of the last combat brigade to leave Iraq.  I could not help but reflect on the long struggle to bring this war to an end.  For me it began in 2001.  On the morning of September 11, I was at work and, like most Americans, feeling stunned.  My job that day was to contact CTOs and VP ITs in Fortune 500 companies in Manhattan to arrange site visits by a research team from a major software manufacturer.  A made two calls, actually talked to someone in the WTC.  The man asked me to call his wife and tell her that he loved her.  I did.  I felt totally freaked out!  After that I refused to make more calls and was almost fired, but our company’s President showed up, sided with me, and suspended operations for the rest of the day.  We gathered in the lunch room and a friend asked me what it all meant.  I correctly identified Al Qaeda as the most likely culprit, and added that I felt certain that Bush would use the attack as an excuse to invade Iraq and curtail the rights of US citizens.  Little did I know jusyt how prophetic I was.  Nine long years later, these questions remain.

Why?

Bush took us to war for two, perhaps three reasons.  Many neocons in the AEI and PNAC wanted GHW Bush to overthrow Saddam and had wanted to finish the job ever since, but this is the least of the factors.  The dominant radical Wahhabi sect in Saudi Arabia takes strong exception to the presence of foreign troops so close to Islam’s two most sacred shrines.  Thus, it would have been beneficial to Saudi relations to establish permanent military bases elsewhere in the Gulf.  Iraq was an ideal location.  Bush wanted to control the world’s fourth largest oil reserves for his cronies in US oil companies.  UK participation cut BP in on the deal.  Operation Iraqi Freedom was always a Republican lie, along with WMD and connections to 9/11.  Iraq was always Bush’s war for oil and conquest.

Is it over?

In a word, No. 6.000 more combat troops will fly home within a week, and US forces remaining will officially be on combat status until August 31.  Even after that, 50,000 troops will remain in so-called noncombatant roles.  Those roles include embedding with Iraqi units as advisors.  Having embedded troops in combat units is combat.  Those roles will also include special forces operations against terrorists.  Operations against terrorists is combat.  So this withdrawal is more a media event than anything else.  The two good things here are that Obama is completing the withdrawal on time and the the last 50,000 troops must be out by the end of 2011.

Who won?

The Iraqi people did not win.  They may have gotten rid of a horrific dictator, but who can say if what comes will be any better? Far too many Iraqis have been killed.  Estimates range from 160,000 to 1,300,000 as of October, 2008.  Since the highest comes from Lancet, I consider it the most credible. Millions have been dislocated.  The nation’s infrastructure is destroyed.  Despite billions spent by taxpayers to restore it, Bush’s Republican minions squandered the money on corrupt Iraqi officials and criminal US corporations.  Women had more rights under Saddam than they do now.  At this point, Iraq doesn’t even have a government.

The US did not win.  4,415 of our fine troops have been killed and thousands more maimed.  We have squandered about $800 billion on direct war costs, and that does not even include the cost of reequipping our units or providing well-deserved care for vets whose minds and bodies have been shattered in this war.  Through no fault of our fine troops, we have not achieved any of the objectives we had when we entered the war.

If anyone has won, it is Iran.  Since the majority of Iraqis are Shia, and since Iraq is divided on sectarian lines, Iran will exert more influence over that nation than anyone else.  Considering the current impasse between Iran and the US, the consequences of Iran’s increased role in Iraq could well be dire.

Now What?

First we need to pray, hope, or whatever it is that you do, that the country does not fall apart before our final exit at the end of 2011.  Second, we need to learn from our mistakes in Iraq.  Even though we are the world’s only super power, we cannot achieve our goals through military action, unless we are supported by a broad coalition of partners who share equally in the combat and cost.  Even then, military force must be a last resort.  Third, we cannot remake the world in our image.  Different cultures develop at different rates, and we cannot change that.  Fourth and most important, Afghanistan presents far more military problems than Iraq ever did.  The sooner we cut our losses there, the better.

Share
Aug 062010
 

constitution

We have been covering the US Constitution line by line.  When Republicans wave their paper props and parrot their vile machinations, we will be prepared to expose the lies.  We have finished the main body of the Constitution.  Now we finish with the Amendments.  You can find the last article on the main body of the Constitution here. It has links to all the others.  The text comes from The US Constitution.  Previous articles in the Amendment series:

Article I
Articles II and III
Article IV
Article V
Article VI
Article VII
Article VIII
Articles IX and X
Articles XI and XII
Article XIII
Article XIV
Article XV
Article XVI
Article XVII
Article XVIII
Article IX
Article XX
Articles XXI and XXII
Articles XXIII and XXIV
Article XXV

 

Amendment XXVI

1:  The right of citizens of the United States, who are 18 years of age or older, to vote, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of age.

2:  The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

The Twenty sixth Amendment, ratified in 1971, lowers the voting age to 18 from 21.  It is not controversial, but I remember feeling somewhat miffed at the time, because I turned 21 the year it passed.

Amendment XXVII

No law varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives shall take effect until an election of Representatives shall have intervened.

The Twenty seventh Amendment, ratified in 1992, prevents legislators from voting themselves an immediate pay raise.  It is not controversial.  However, I have heard several Republicans claim that they were responsible for this Amendment, instituted because of “Democrat Party corruption”.  This is a lie.  The Amendment was proposed voted on by the House and Senate in 1789.  No, that is not a typo.  At the time, only eight states moved to ratify it, and it languished in limbo for 203 years before it was fully ratified by the states.  Republicans could hardly have been behind it, because the party did not yet exist.

This concludes the Constitution Series, here at Politics Plus.  I hope you have enjoyed it, and even more, that you have learned from it.  We have seen, time and time again, issue by issue, that Republican claims to honor our nation’s founding document are as bogus as the statements they make about it.

While Republicans claim to honor the Bible, they ignore everything Jesus taught about caring for the poor and outcast.  While Republicans claim to honor our flag, they drag it through the filth of inequality, bigotry, and repression of our most basic rights.  While Republicans claim to honor our Constitution above all, they would undo much of what it guarantees.  It they are allowed to take power again, the future of our Constitution is certain.

6burning-constitution

Share
Aug 052010
 

constitution

We have been covering the US Constitution line by line.  When Republicans wave their paper props and parrot their vile machinations, we will be prepared to expose the lies.  We have finished the main body of the Constitution.  Now we continue with the Amendments.  You can find the last article on the main body of the Constitution here. It has links to all the others.  The text comes from The US Constitution.  Previous articles in the Amendment series:

Article I
Articles II and III
Article IV
Article V
Article VI
Article VII
Article VIII
Articles IX and X
Articles XI and XII
Article XIII
Article XIV
Article XV
Article XVI
Article XVII
Article XVIII
Article IX
Article XX
Articles XXI and XXII
Articles XXIII and XXIV

 

Amendment XXV

1:  In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President.

2:  Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.

3:  Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.

4:  Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session.  If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.

The Twenty fifth Amendment, ratified in 1965, establishes executive succession in the event of death or incapacity.  If a President states that he is no longer incapacitated only a two thirds majority vote of both Houses can block his return.  The amendment is not controversial.

Barring unforeseen circumstances, this series should conclude tomorrow.

Share
Aug 042010
 

constitution

We have been covering the US Constitution line by line.  When Republicans wave their paper props and parrot their vile machinations, we will be prepared to expose the lies.  We have finished the main body of the Constitution.  Now we continue with the Amendments.  You can find the last article on the main body of the Constitution here. It has links to all the others.  The text comes from The US Constitution.  Previous articles in the Amendment series:

Article I
Articles II and III
Article IV
Article V
Article VI
Article VII
Article VIII
Articles IX and X
Articles XI and XII
Article XIII
Article XIV
Article XV
Article XVI
Article XVII
Article XVIII
Article IX
Article XX
Articles XXI and XXII

 

Amendment XXIII

1:  The District constituting the seat of government of the United States shall appoint in such manner as the Congress may direct:   A number of electors of President and Vice President equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives in Congress to which the District would be entitled if it were a state, but in no event more than the least populous state; they shall be in addition to those appointed by the states, but they shall be considered, for the purposes of the election of President and Vice President, to be electors appointed by a state; and they shall meet in the District and perform such duties as provided by the twelfth article of amendment.

2:  The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

The Twenty third Amendment, ratified in 1961, provides electors in Presidential elections to the District of Columbia, but limits the number of electors to the number allowed least populous state.  Prior to this, Washington, DC residents could not vote for President/VP.  It is not controversial.

Amendment XXIV

1.  The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.

2.  The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

The Twenty fourth Amendment, ratified in 1964, ended the disenfranchisement of African Americans through use of a poll tax.  It is not controversial.  However, the Democrats who were about to become Republicans, just changed tactics and moved to literacy tests.  They continue to attempt to throw up barriers against poor and minority voters to this day.  As much as they deny their racism, their policies validate it.

I shall try to put up a new article in this series almost every day.  It will take some time to cover it all, but when we’re done, we shall be immune to the lies with which Republicans seek to undermine our freedoms.

Share
Aug 032010
 

constitution

We have been covering the US Constitution line by line.  When Republicans wave their paper props and parrot their vile machinations, we will be prepared to expose the lies.  We have finished the main body of the Constitution.  Now we continue with the Amendments.  You can find the last article on the main body of the Constitution here. It has links to all the others.  The text comes from The US Constitution.  Previous articles in the Amendment series:

Article I
Articles II and III
Article IV
Article V
Article VI
Article VII
Article VIII
Articles IX and X
Articles XI and XII
Article XIII
Article XIV
Article XV
Article XVI
Article XVII
Article XVIII
Article IX
Article XX

 

Article [XXI]

1:  The eighteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.

2:  The transportation or importation into any State, Territory, or possession of the United States for delivery or use therein of intoxicating liquors, in violation of the laws thereof, is hereby prohibited.

3:  This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by conventions in the several States, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years from the date of the submission hereof to the States by the Congress.

The Twenty first Amendment repeals the Eighteenth, prohibition.  It was ratified in 1933. 

Clause 2 provides authority for states to regulate the import and use of alcohol within their respective borders.

Clause three provides a seven year time limit for ratification.

We covered the controversial aspects of prohibition in our study of the Eighteenth Amendment, so I shall not repeat that.

Amendment XXII

1:  No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.  But this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

2:  This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several states within seven years from the date of its submission to the states by the Congress.

Ratified in 1951, the Twenty second Amendment limits a President to two elective terms.  Clause 2 contains a seven year time limit.  It is not controversial.  However, there was talk, during the second term of the Bush Regime, about staging a Reichstag Fire and suspending elections to keep Bush in office beyond his second term.  With the economy spiraling out of control, due to their malfeasance, Republicans decided it might be better to lose power and blame the Democrats.

I shall try to put up a new article in this series almost every day.  It will take some time to cover it all, but when we’re done, we shall be immune to the lies with which Republicans seek to undermine our freedoms.

Share
Aug 012010
 

 constitution

We have been covering the US Constitution line by line.  When Republicans wave their paper props and parrot their vile machinations, we will be prepared to expose the lies.  We have finished the main body of the Constitution.  Now we continue with the Amendments.  You can find the last article on the main body of the Constitution here. It has links to all the others.  The text comes from The US Constitution.  Previous articles in the Amendment series:

Article I
Articles II and III
Article IV
Article V
Article VI
Article VII
Article VIII
Articles IX and X
Articles XI and XII
Article XIII
Article XIV
Article XV
Article XVI
Article XVII
Article XVIII
Article IX

 

Article [XX]

1:  The terms of the President and Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the 3d day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin.

2:  The Congress shall assemble at least once in every year, and such meeting shall begin at noon on the 3d day of January, unless they shall by law appoint a different day.

3:  If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President.  If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.

4:  The Congress may by law provide for the case of the death of any of the persons from whom the House of Representatives may choose a President whenever the right of choice shall have devolved upon them, and for the case of the death of any of the persons from whom the Senate may choose a Vice President whenever the right of choice shall have devolved upon them.

5:  Sections 1 and 2 shall take effect on the 15th day of October following the ratification of this article.

6:  This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission.

The Twentieth Amendment, passed in 1933, is mostly housekeeping updates to other Amendments.

Clause 1 sets 1/20 as the date Presidential terms end and begin.  It is not controversial.  However it is interesting to note that SCOTUS used this deadline as an excuse to appoint GW Bush as president in 2000, stopping the recount before it ascertain that Gore actually won Florida and with it, the election.  As such, it figures in the greatest American disaster since the Civil War.

Clause 2 sets 1/3 as the date the House and Senate shall convene annually. It is not controversial.  However it is interesting to note that this date is the one time each year that the House and Senate change their rules by majority vote.  If Republicans win the House they will likely reinstate their old rule that no bill or amendment can come to the floor unless it has receive4d the support of the majority in the majority caucus.  In the Senate, it’s the best opportunity for Democrats to end the filibuster and individual holds.

Clauses 3 and 4 adjust the succession of the President and Vice President.  They are not controversial.

Clause 5 assures that, upon ratification, there would be time to plan for the schedule changes.  It is not controversial.

Clause 6 sets a seven year time limit for ratification.  This is not controversial.  However it is interesting to note that the Equal Rights Amendment lacks such a time limit.  It can still be adopted if ratified by three more states.  Illinois is the only solidly blue state of the fifteen that have not ratified it.

I shall try to put up a new article in this series almost every day.  It will take some time to cover it all, but when we’re done, we shall be immune to the lies with which Republicans seek to undermine our freedoms.

Share
Jul 312010
 

constitution

We have been covering the US Constitution line by line.  When Republicans wave their paper props and parrot their vile machinations, we will be prepared to expose the lies.  We have finished the main body of the Constitution.  Now we continue with the Amendments.  You can find the last article on the main body of the Constitution here. It has links to all the others.  The text comes from The US Constitution.  Previous articles in the Amendment series:

Article I
Articles II and III
Article IV
Article V
Article VI
Article VII
Article VIII
Articles IX and X
Articles XI and XII
Article XIII
Article XIV
Article XV
Article XVI
Article XVII
Article XVIII

 

Article [XIX]

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

The Nineteenth Amendment provides for women’s suffrage.  It is not controversial.  Democrats and most Independents support women’s rights.  Some Republican men would prefer their women barefoot and pregnant.  However they are afraid to voice it.  There are some things men just should not do.  If a woman’s ass does not look fat in those jeans, she will not ask if it does.  When she asks, men, who wish to survive, lie.  Opposing women’s suffrage brings a similar response. 😉

I shall try to put up a new article in this series almost every day.  It will take some time to cover it all, but when we’re done, we shall be immune to the lies with which Republicans seek to undermine our freedoms.

Share
Jul 302010
 

 constitution

We have been covering the US Constitution line by line.  When Republicans wave their paper props and parrot their vile machinations, we will be prepared to expose the lies.  We have finished the main body of the Constitution.  Now we continue with the Amendments.  You can find the last article on the main body of the Constitution here. It has links to all the others.  The text comes from The US Constitution.  Previous articles in the Amendment series:

Article I
Articles II and III
Article IV
Article V
Article VI
Article VII
Article VIII
Articles IX and X
Articles XI and XII
Article XIII
Article XIV
Article XV
Article XVI
Article XVII

 

Article [XVIII]

1:  After one year from the ratification of this article the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors within, the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from the United States and all territory subject to the jurisdiction thereof for beverage purposes is hereby prohibited.

2:  The Congress and the several States shall have concurrent power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

3:  This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of the several States, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years from the date of the submission hereof to the States by the Congress.

The Eighteenth Amendment provided for prohibition.  It is not controversial in itself, because it has been repealed.  However, it is still worthy of discussion because of what it illustrates.

The founding fathers were wise to include the establishment clause in the First Amendment.  In spite of it, the religious right have tried to force their piety codes upon people who did not want them throughout our history.  The Eighteenth Amendment demonstrates what happens when they are successful in those attempts.  The effects were catastrophic.  Prohibition brought organized crime out of the seedy ghettos and into the open.  Gang bosses became celebrities.  Lawless violence became rampant.  Enforcement overwhelmed the criminal justice system.

This is relevant today, because government has outlawed drug use, and the war on drugs has brought many of the same problems.  There were (and are) social ills associated with both alcohol and drugs, but in both cases, it is their misuse that causes the problems.  Many drink, or use, responsibly.  The way to deal with social ills is to provide social services.  Some people abuse guns, but we don’t ban their responsible use.  Some people drive aggressively and cause accidents, but we don’t ban cars.

Republicans argue that we should impose morality, and often use the illegality of murder for support.  However good that might sound, there is a big difference.  If I murder you, my action interferes with your rights.  If I have a beer or smoke a joint, it does not.  But Republicans argue that I may violate someone’s rights by my subsequent behavior, like drunk driving.  If I do, restrict me as an individual, but not everyone.

For clarity, I neither drink nor use illegal drugs, and neither support nor advise their use.  This is not a personal issue for me.  The issue is the manner in which Republicans try to impose their will on those whose behavior they dislike.

Share