Forgot about a second doctor’s appointment today, so Friday Fun will have to morph into Saturday Smile.
Sorry.
From the same grifter that last month offered “autographed” photos of himself for $45, Herr Drumpf this week asked his Trumpkins to vote for their favorite design from four offerings to then become the “Offical” [sic] Trump membership card. Trump’s Save America PAC, according to Insider, sent out at least two emails with the four selections of red-and gold cards, similar to credit cards.
“The card you select will be carried by Patriots all around the Country,” the first email said. “They will be a sign of your dedicated support to our movement to SAVE AMERICA, and I’m putting my full trust in you.”
The Trump team said in a follow-up email, “We’re about to launch our Official Trump Cards, which will be reserved for President Trump’s STRONGEST supporters.”
“We recently met with the President in his Florida office and showed him four designs,” the email continued. “Originally we were planning on releasing just one design, but when President Trump saw the cards on his desk, he said, ‘These are BEAUTIFUL. We should let the American People decide – they ALWAYS know best!'”
[EDITOR’S NOTE: “They ALWAYS know best!” He’s right – both Hillary and Biden beat him with landslide votes!]
But two glaring oddities were immediately noticed:
[1] He misspelled “Official” as “Offical”
It’s not all that surprising. After all, we knew they were Nazis – but obviously they’re not GRAMMAR Nazis.
Even more understandable when you meet the proofreading team for the membership card:
[2] Donnie is no longer even trying to hide his true feelings. He brazenly included the official symbol of the Nazis that was first used in 1920s Germany. So it’s not a bit difficult to believe that The Former Guy (TFG) would go with the Third Reich’s official symbol – the Iron Eagle!
As you knew would happen, the Twitterverse pounced!
Nothing spells official quite like… misspelling ‘official.’ pic.twitter.com/PdAZLgMeKQ
— The Lincoln Project (@ProjectLincoln) August 5, 2021
The Nazi’s Iron Eagle quickly became a favorite topic.
Trying to think where I have seen the new Trump Card insignia before 😡🤦🏻♀️ pic.twitter.com/sZ3VNgFUvt
— Amy Siskind 🏳️🌈 (@Amy_Siskind) August 5, 2021
Trump’s new card, which of course he’s selling to his supporters to continue the grift, has a very Nazi like Third Reich feel. Very on brand for Trump. pic.twitter.com/dpsJZek8Zk
— Mike Sington (@MikeSington) August 5, 2021
See the difference between Trump card & Nazi symbolism? Me either. pic.twitter.com/Rw2B1KCUCh
— 🌹 𝒜𝓋𝓇𝒾𝓁 🌹 (@avril4799) August 5, 2021
And it’s not the first time TFG has used the Third Reich’s Iron Eagle. Remember the Trump/Pence “America First” T-shirts?
The claim: Trump campaign shirts feature imperial eagle, a Nazi symbol
Our ruling: True https://t.co/3eCiYdgQvK
— USA TODAY (@USATODAY) July 12, 2020
And since request for an armband was raised, I decided to go ahead and design one for them myself:
Word on the street is the card will be well worth having. If your Visa or Discover card is declined at Starbucks, you can use it to at least buy a cup of covfefe. It probably won’t be long before we see TFG borrowing Capital One’s credit card slogan: “What’s in Your Wallet?” I can see it now:
Of course there will be other perks (but only if those Trump businesses still exist) …
Benefits of the Trump Card:
Premium Boarding at Trump Shuttle *
VIP Box Seating at New Jersey Generals home games
Free complimentary breakfast at Trump Casinos
Good for 6 credits at Trump University* Lounge access only to Gold and Platinum members#TrumpCards #TrumpCard pic.twitter.com/Q8OXz5YOwa
— Tomi Ahonen Upgraded To Moron Level Trump Card (@tomiahonen) August 5, 2021
Rep. Eric Swalwell was kind enough to add a disclaimer for the card:
A "Trump Card" is NOT a "Get Out of Jail Free" card. https://t.co/8Suua73LcJ
— Eric Swalwell (@ericswalwell) August 5, 2021
I think this is a good Bottom Line summary of TFG membership card grift:
While last Tuesday’s gut-wrenching testimony of trauma, terrorism, treason and tears by Police Officers Gonell, Fanone, Hodges and Dunn might not be enough to change the minds of many in the GQP – it did a great deal to restore my faith in humanity.
Consequently, I believe it’s worthwhile to extend that good feeling with today’s offering.
[Editor’s Note: You might want to keep a tissue close by.]
A video taken by someone with the handle “McLiez” and posted on Facebook has been viewed over a million times and shared over 170,000 times – and deservedly so!
It’s just a minute-long clip taken of cars stuck in traffic. But a driver in one of the cars (believed to be in the Philippines) captured the most heart-warming video of a small boy holding a cloth that he most likely uses to clean car windows to earn some money. He approaches a stopped car with another small boy in the back. The child in the car rolls down his window and starts chatting with the boy. He then gives the child in the street a small toy he has so he could play with it, and the small boy is clearly delighted!
As the boys play with each other, the one in the car then gives him a large dirt-digging excavator toy to play with. When the child in the street later tries to return the toys, the boy in the car refuses to take them back.
Not sure what to do, but wanting to show his gratitude, the boy in the street goes to get a bag of snacks that he shares with the boy in the car. As the traffic starts moving again, the two boys wave to each other.
[NOTE: This link to a Facebook posting is NOT the original Facebook posting by McLiez, but one from the “India Times”. I’ve never belonged to Facebook and I’m not sure if the original is even available anymore. But I thought I should give Facebook some type of credit for posting it.]
BUT I did find a YouTube video of it:
In the same spirit I thought it’d be worthwhile to share a “Bonus” video of the kindness of one child shown to another, when a little boy comes to the aid of a clearly distraught autistic child on the first day of school.
I doubt children this age know what “compassion” or “empathy” even means. But more importantly, they know how to show it and share it with their fellow human beings.
Mitch was kind enough to recently share a delightful video titled “Birds Can Dance!”
Despite my hearing deficit, I thought it was very cool! Although it was the creative and complex editing that made them look like they were dancing, it was very entertaining.
But it caused me to start wondering: Can birds actually dance? So I started searching, and it turns out the answer is a scientifically proven YES!
But first we need to recognize that this was the answer to the scientific definition of what “Dance” means, because it’s been long believed that only humans have the ability to dance.
“Dancing” is an untutored, spontaneous response where the animal moves on the beat, matching motion to music. The animal cannot have a trainer. There cannot be a human in the room whose moves it copies. It cannot be rewarded for its movements. It cannot spend weeks exposed to the same tune. And when the music changes tempo, it has to change with it, sticking to the beat. So the “dance” is triggered by sound, but the moves come from within the animal itself.
And we need to realize that none of the animals that science has decided can truly “dance” are going to give any of the contestants on “Dancing With the Stars” a run for their money.
But still, they have provided not only a lot of entertainment for the masses – but also served science well. So how did a sulphur-crested cockatoo named Snowball get to be a main participant in a science research project?
It all began with a YouTube video of him boogieing to “Everybody (Back Street’s Back) by the Back Street Boys … I kid you not!
A colleague of Dr. Aniruddh Patel, then a neurobiologist at the Neurosciences Institute in La Jolla, CA, (now a professor at Tufts) asked him to watch the video of Snowball grooving, and Dr. Patel reports his reaction:
“I still remember it. I was staring at the screen and my jaw just hit the floor. I thought, ‘Is this real? Could this actually be happening?’ Within minutes I’d written Snowball’s owner.”
Snowball had been taken to a bird shelter in northern Indiana because the daughter, who was the primary caretaker, began college. The dad and daughter also provided Irena Schulz, director of the shelter, with a CD by the Back Street Boys, and told her to play it if Snowball looked bored.
One day Irena cranked up the CD and was astounded at what happened next. She immediately grabbed a video of Snowball’s strutting his moves on the back of a chair and submitted it to YouTube – where it almost immediately went viral!
A few months later she got a call from Dr. Patel who was astounded by the birds dancing. “Let’s design an experiment to see if this is real.” Ms. Schulz, who had previously worked as a molecular biologist, agreed: “Yeah, let’s do that!”
They made 11 different versions of “Everybody,” all at the same pitch, but changed the tempos from 2.5% to 20% faster and then slower than the original.
They played each version and videotaped Snowball’s response, and then analyzed each video frame by frame.
Snowball wasn’t perfect (and was actually pretty bad at the slower tempos). But he was on the beat at least 60% of the time – very much like a toddler when learning to dance to music. Statistical analysis of the data confirmed that Snowball was, in fact, dancing in time with the music.
To my mind, equally impressive is that Snowball had developed a repertoire of 14 distinct moves – none of which were taught to him. He created them on his own. To be tabulated as a distinct move it had to occur on two separate occasions. Let’s enjoy them:
At the same time Dr. Patel was studying Snowball, another research group at Harvard was studying Alex, an African grey parrot, who also danced. They also concluded that Alex’s movements were synchronized with the beat of the music, and did not occur merely by chance. They wondered what feature(s) these animals shared with humans that enabled them to dance.
One of the researchers, Adena Schachner (then a graduate student at Harvard) said: “It had recently been theorized that vocal mimicry (the ability to acquire sounds through learning) might be related to the ability to move to a beat. The particular theory was that natural selection for vocal mimicry resulted in a brain mechanism that was also needed for moving to a beat. This theory made a really specific prediction: Only animals that can mimic sound should be able to keep a beat.”
Schachner realized that since people loved posting videos of their critters “performing,” she decided YouTube would be a wonderfully unique research resource.
She collected over 5,000 YouTube videos of wildly different animals (dogs, cats, chimps, orangutans, horses, etc.) and analyzed them frame-by-frame to see it they were moving to the beat. She narrowed the “dancers” down to 39 animals. Twentynine of them were in the parrot family, comprised of 14 different species. The rest were Asian elephants.
The one feature that all animals who can dance share with humans is vocal mimicry or vocal learning. Surprisingly enough our closest relatives (apes and monkeys) lack this ability. While they can certainly learn from one another, they don’t mimic each other’s sounds. And Schachner found no videos showing they could inherently move to a beat.
I doubt Dr. Patel ever thought that YouTube, besides being entertaining, would prove that a bird’s variety of movements would indicate a type of cerebral flexibility that suggests his creative choreography is not simply “a brainstem reflex to sound. [But] actually a complex cognitive act that involves choosing among different types of possible movement options. It’s exactly how we think of human dancing.”
As always, the fun part of science is finding answers. So now, thanks to Patel’s new paper, we learned we are not the only ones dancing to the beat: “Spontaneity and diversity of movement to music are not uniquely human.”
And Snowball, who is only 25 years old, could be providing answers for another half-century since Cockatoos in captivity can live to be about 75.
I can’t help but wonder what Freddie Mercury would think if he knew that a cockatoo dancing to his signature song got over 8 MILLION clicks. So let’s let Snowball dance his way out to Queen’s “Another One Bites the Dust”.
[EDITOR”S NOTE: While I don’t think this posting is “Fun” in the usual sense – I do think it has some satisfying qualities.]
WOW! This week has been one revelation after another documenting what we all knew all along: Trump is Batsh!t Crazy Demagogue! However, it’s hard to believe that Donnie’s final days as Oval Office occupier were far worse than we ever imagined!
One book after another has come out to show just how unhinged Donnie was during his final days. Starting with “I Alone Can Fix It” by Pulitzer Prize-winning reporters Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker. From it we learn that Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark Milley and his allies were so distraught about Donnie spreading the Big Lie about the election that they thought there was a distinct possibility that he might try a coup when he lost. As a precaution to save the country they devised contingency plans to prevent any Trump illegal power grab.
One was that they would all sequentially resign, one after the other, rather than carry out a clearly unconstitutional order from The Former Guy. Sort of like Richard Nixon’s Saturday Night Massacre – but in reverse.
Gen. Milley shared his concerns about a possible coup with his military colleagues, legislators and friends:
General Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, likened Donald Trump’s effort to hold on to power after the 2020 election to Adolf Hitler, saying the president was preaching “the gospel of the Führer” with his lies about the election being stolen.
“They may try, but they’re not going to f\/cking succeed,” Milley told his officers. “You can’t do this without the military. You can’t do this without the CIA and the FBI. We’re the guys with the guns.”
Milley was disturbed by the sight of Trump supporters rallying to his cause in November, calling them “Brownshirts in the streets….” Milley “believed Trump was stoking unrest, possibly in hopes of an excuse to invoke the Insurrection Act and call out the military.” The general likened the U.S. to Germany’s fragile Weimar Republic in the early 1930s. “This is a Reichstag moment,” he said, referring to the arson attack on Germany’s Parliament that Hitler used as a pretext to assume absolute power and destroy democracy.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/07/i-alone-can-fix-it-mark-milley-likened-trump-to-hitler.html
But what I find fascinating is The Former Guy’s inability to just keep his yap shut, let things settle down and NOT make matters worse.
But no – he always has to have the last word. And so we now have what will be two of his Top Ten Punchlines: “If I Was Going To Do a Coup …” and “I’m Not Into Coups”
It comes from a statement he released on 7/15/21:
Despite massive Voter Fraud and Irregularities during the 2020 Presidential Election Scam, that we are now seeing play out in very big and important States, I never threatened, or spoke about, to anyone, a coup of our Government. So ridiculous! Sorry to inform you, but an Election is my form of “coup,” and if I was [sic] going to do a coup, one of the last people I would want to do it with is General Mark Milley.
[snip]
I’m not into coups.
[NOTE: It would be too time-consuming to markup all his juvenile random capitalizations and insertion of commas haphazardly. But one of my pet peeves is using “were” when writing in the subjunctive mood – and his was an appalling abrogation of the subjunctive. It should be: “If I WERE going to do a coup.”
[Here endeth today’s pedantic grammar lesson.]
The Former Guy trying to deny he would ever do a coup (but failing) is the exact same defense he used in trying to deny his sexual assault of E. Jean Carroll by claiming “She’s not my type.”
But let’s note that Trump did NOT say “I would never have raped Ms. Carroll because I think it’s a despicable act, and I’m opposed to all violence against women.” It was simply “She’s not my type.”
So he virtually confesses that he would have raped her … IF she were his type. So he would have led a coup … IF he were able to find someone other than Gen. Milley. Damned by his own words.
And of course the Twitterverse was not going to pass on the chance to weigh-in on Former Guy’s “confession”.
Former Guy’s actions since his loss on 11/3/2020 were actually all part of a multi-faceted Coup attempt:
1. Lost the election by a pretty sizable margin despite efforts to sabotage the USPS
2. Spent the time between election and certification trying to strongarm officials into changing the vote totals
3. Tried to recruit "alternate" electors to override the states' votes https://t.co/Xrx7G4o6T1— Parker Molloy (@ParkerMolloy) July 15, 2021
4. Installed loyalists at DOD and State
5. Filed all manner of absurd lawsuits hoping that judges he appointed would award him the election in return
6. Called on his supporters to go to DC on 1/6 to urge Congress to throw out the votesCoup. It was all part of a coup attempt.
— Parker Molloy (@ParkerMolloy) July 15, 2021
It wasn't just 1/6. It never was. And it wasn't just Trump. It was the entire GOP. Why do you think so many were hesitant to say Biden won? Because they wanted to see if Trump's coup attempt was successful.
— Parker Molloy (@ParkerMolloy) July 15, 2021
Imagine if he devoted a fraction of the energy it took to write this to persuading vaccine-hesitant people.
— IDK Your BFF Rose (@rose_of_tx) July 15, 2021
“I’m not into coups, but if I was, my coups would be tremendous. The best coups, maybe ever.”
— Djfry (@djfrein) July 15, 2021
And I particularly enjoyed the Dr. Seuss style parody of Donnie’s “confession” at Slate.
I do not like you General Mark
I did not like you in the park
I did not ever do a coup
I did not ever coup with you
I would not could not coup with you
Not in a park, or in a shoe/
Not wearing gray or wearing blue
General Mark, you’re soft as goo
I would not could not coup with you
Oh, and if Donnie’s statement reminded you of OJ Simpson’s book …
You’re not alone!
PS:
I’d be curious and grateful if you would indicate which classic punchline from Former Guy’s statement you prefer:
[1] If I Was Going to Do A Coup
Or …
[2] I’m Not Into Coups
It all began when Gov. Kristi Gnome (R-SD) posted a pouting 4th of July Tweet whining that “Sparklers Suck” because fireworks were not allowed at Mount Rushmore this year because of the high risk of wildfires from the drought
(OK – I’ll note that she seems to prefer spelling her surname N-o-e-m.)
If you scroll through the wonderful Comments responding to her whiny Tweet, she was deservedly and repeatedly torn a new one! In fact, on Daily Kos where I learned about her bitchy Tweet, I, too, responded:
Hey, Kristi —
You know what really sucks? Forest fires really suck!
These are all photos from fires — Black Hills, Custer, Hill City, Mount Rushmore, Schroeder, Storm Hill, Vineyard, Wanblee and White Draw — in YOUR state!
Then I got to thinking, I bet there are some pretty cool alternatives to fireworks. So I started looking, and found a few examples of drones being used for light shows.
I’ll start with the best one I found from the USA: It was created by Intel, so it has a little commercial flavor to it.
(If you want to decrease the viewing time and really not lose much effect, on YouTube, click the cogwheel down at the lower right – and then select “Playback Speed” to select different options if you want it faster or slower. I tried all the videos at double speed, and I don’t think it lost a thing.)
Greenpeace created a well-done display with a message for world leaders when they arrived in Cornwall, UK on June 11, 2021:
The world’s record for the longest drone light show tells the story of Vincent Van Gogh’s life, and lasted for 26 minutes. (And yes, they included a little bit about cutting his ear off.)
BUT the YouTube presentation was sped up to almost 4 times normal speed – and I increased the playback speed on YouTube to twice that. And it did not suffer one bit.
There was a clever drone light show introduction of an online game that ended with the drones forming a scannable QR code enabling folks to download the game.
But for a true “WOW!” factor, it seems China is the hands-down winner:
This year there were a number of cities that opted for a drone light show instead of fireworks – including Cincinnati, Rochester NY, Richland Hills area in Texas, Tusayan AZ, Texas A&M University, and even Macy’s included a drone light show as part of its NYC spectacular display. (St. Petersburg FL was going to, but hurricane Elsa forced a cancellation.)
But unfortunately, drone light shows are NOT cheap. And it requires 2-3 months lead time to create and will last about 5 to 10 minutes. Here’s the pricing guidelines for an Intel produced show:
For reference, a small-town 4th of July fireworks display will run $2k to $7k just for the fireworks (not counting setup, fencing, insurance, etc.). Disneyworld’s nightly firework display runs $33k.
Still, they offer a safe program with lots more options than a fireworks display.