Conventional wisdom dictates that Elizabeth Warren cannot beat Rick Scott (R-MA). Conventional wisdom is wrong. Conventional wisdom also dictated that Jeff Merkley (D-OR) could not beat incumbent Gordon Smith. We demonstrated that Gordon Smith,Scott Brown, was a false moderate. Smith was moderate whenever we didn’t need him. If the issue was decided, one way or the other, and his vote did not matter, he voted with Democrats. Whenever it mattered, he always lined up and goose-stepped with the Republican regime. If MA progressives become energized for Warren, as we did for Merkley, she can win.
On Thursday, Elizabeth Warren announced that she’s starting an exploratory committee for a potential U.S. Senate run in Massachusetts. The news doesn’t come as much of a surprise. The Harvard Law professor, who recently stepped down from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau she originated, has been the subject of Senatorial speculation for months, if not longer. She recently hinted of her candidacy on a progressive Massachusetts blog and set off on a listening tour around the Bay State this week.
Some have called the move a trap. Her would-be Republican opponent’s popularity is pretty remarkable, even in polls run by Democrats. In the seat long held by Democratic lion Ted Kennedy, Sen. Scott Brown has played the Massachusetts version of a conservative fairly well, bucking his party just enough to come off as independent minded. And her Democratic challengers hardly make her a slam dunk: While she gets the best margin in a head-to-head poll pitting Democrats against Brown, her hardly impressive 28 percent (compared with Brown’s 53 percent) is not that much higher than City Year co-founder Alan Khazei’s 24 percent or Newton Mayor Setti Warren’s 21 percent.
But though it’s hardly guaranteed she will win the Democratic nomination—much less beat Brown—I think she stands a pretty good chance. Warren has become a darling of the left, so much so that they nearly made her appointment to head the agency she dreamed up a litmus test for President Obama’s progressive bona fides.
Ironically, Warren has something Brown now doesn’t, at least to the same extent: Passion from her followers…
Inserted from <Washington Post>
I still would rather see Warren replace Timmy the Tool, but this is the next best thing. Long term, she has the potential to become America’s first woman President.
12 Responses to “Elizabeth Warren 2012!”
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
I’m just glad she’s running to take that stupid smirk of Scott Browns’s face. 👿
She isn’t yet, Lisa.
Although I’m not in Mass., I think she stands a very good chance of beating Brown. He’s too much of a waffler.
He has the disadvantage of being a goose-stepper in a relatively progressive state.
I think her national recognizability will do her good – although her GE opponent is likely to get funds galore to in attempt to smear her.
Excellent point, Rob.
I hope Warren DOES run and thrashes Brown’s sneaky little self-serving Republican ass – badly! ELIZABETH WARREN FOR US SENATOR!!!
Amen again!
Just like I think Huntsman’s half-way sane campaign is part of his effort to position him for the repubican nomination in 2016, I think Warren as a Senator is a much better platform to position her for a run for the White House.
I was thinking the same, Nameless..
Good woman for any job she wants!!!
Especially Timmy’s!