Joyce Vance thought this was important enough for an extra dedicated column and email … and I can’t disagree.
Judge Engoron’s Email
Joyce’s column includes a fair-sized photo of the actual email, which is almost as telling in tone as it is in fact. I’m not sure that anyone other than a trial lawyer would have seen this coming, but, on the other hand, it makes a lot of sense, including the part about who is legally entitled to what information about whom, which would certainly not have occurred to me. I was aware of “falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus” but it hadn’t occurred to me that anyone would think to use Weisselberg as a defense witness. As Hercule Poirot would have said (and did say, many times) – it gives one furiously to think.
Fasten your seat belts, it’s going to be a bumpy ride.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.