Everyday Erinyes #225

 Posted by at 9:40 am  Politics
Jul 252020
 

Experts in autocracies have pointed out that it is, unfortunately, easy to slip into normalizing the tyrant, hence it is important to hang on to outrage. These incidents which seem to call for the efforts of the Greek Furies (Erinyes) to come and deal with them will, I hope, help with that. As a reminder, though no one really knows how many there were supposed to be, the three names we have are Alecto, Megaera, and Tisiphone. These roughly translate as “unceasing,” “grudging,” and “vengeful destruction.”

Most of us have probably seen the story about the Michigan teenager (14 IIRC – oh, wait, 15, at least now) who was placed into juvenile detention because she failed to complete her virtual homework. That was in mid-May. Most of us also probably thought that was an over-reaction – and possibly an over-reach – on the part of the courts. I certainly feel it was an over-reaction. But it was not an over-reach. And it was not because of skin color alone, though that was a factor. The key word in all the stories is “probation.” She was on probation. Most people have heard of it but are not familiar with the details of how it works.

At some point in time, the young lady was convicted of some offense which resulted in her being put on probation. Note that I do not claim that she did it (it’s briefly described in the article), nor do I claim that a “white” child in the same circumstances would have been convicted – that is where the skin color comes in. But the result was to put her into probational status.

All societies, including ours, have a social contract – there are things which are “done” and things which are “not done.” None of these things are in any statute books – it’s purely a matter of people agreeing. Of course, people don’t always agree – and it can get comical – but there’s no reason for a court of law to get involved. Failure to do homework would ordinarily be in social contract territory.

But if a person is on probation, there are behaviors normally covered by the social contract which can now come under the territory of probation, and which can therefore violate not just the social contract, but also the conditions of probation. And not all of those actions and inactions are always written down in the terms of probation. The courts have leeway to determine what constitutes a violation of probation. And a violation of probation can put a probationer right (back) into detention. Regardless of skin color, gender, or other social status. And that is what happened to “Grace.”

The young lady has petitioned to be released from detention, and that is what this story is about. I present it without further comment.
================================================================

Judge Won’t Free Michigan Teenager Sent to Juvenile Detention After Not Doing Online Schoolwork

ProPublica Illinois is an independent, nonprofit newsroom that produces investigative journalism with moral force. Sign up for The ProPublica Illinois newsletter for weekly updates.

PONTIAC, Mich. — A Michigan family court judge on Monday denied a motion to release a teenager who has been held at a juvenile facility since mid-May for violating probation after not doing her online schoolwork, saying the girl will benefit from ongoing treatment there.

“I think you are exactly where you are supposed to be,” the presiding judge of the Oakland County Family Court Division, Mary Ellen Brennan, told the 15-year-old. “You are blooming there, but there is more work to be done.”

The decision came despite an argument from the attorneys of the teenager, Grace*, that the therapy and educational support she receives at the facility are inadequate and a statement by the prosecutor that his office supported her release. Caseworkers for the court and Children’s Village, where she is being held, testified she should be kept at the facility until she completes the monthslong program.

 

After the hearing, Grace and her mother, Charisse, embraced for more than a minute, the first time they have had physical contact since May 14 because of COVID-19 restrictions. They sobbed audibly through their masks before leaving the courtroom separately.

During the two-hour hearing at the Oakland County court, Brennan also mounted a defense of her initial decision in May to place Grace in detention for the probation violation, devoting about 45 minutes to recounting the troubled relationship between the girl and her mother.

Brennan began by speaking directly to the girl, saying she wanted to ensure the information was on the record: “This morning for you, respectfully, it is going to get worse before it gets better. Because I am about to go over all the crap, all the negative, all the prior attempts at helping. I am going through it all.”

The case, which has drawn national scrutiny, was detailed in a ProPublica Illinois investigation co-published last week with the Detroit Free Press and Bridge Magazine. It has sparked several protests outside the courthouse, and members of Congress, state lawmakers and Birmingham Public Schools board members have called for Grace’s release. The Michigan Supreme Court’s oversight agency has opened a review of the procedures in the cases.

Monday’s hearing came after Grace’s new attorney, Jonathan Biernat, filed a motion Thursday asking the court to review the case and send her home.

Brennan limited discussion to Grace’s “progress and engagement” in the treatment program. She denied Grace’s attorneys’ attempts to discuss her original decision to detain the teenager for the probation violation and would not allow testimony from Grace’s special education teacher.

The prosecutor’s office has until Friday to respond to Biernat’s motion to reconsider the ruling on the probation violation, and Brennan said she will then issue a written opinion.

Grace was a high school sophomore in Birmingham Public Schools when she was charged with assault and theft last year, for incidents in which she bit her mother’s finger and pulled her hair and stole another student’s cellphone.

 

She was placed on probation in mid-April and, among other requirements, was to complete her schoolwork. Grace, who has ADHD and receives special education services, struggled with the transition to online learning and fell behind when Groves High School stopped in-person learning because of COVID-19. Her probation officer filed a violation against her on May 5, two weeks into the probation.

On May 14, Brennan found Grace guilty of violating probation for “failure to submit any schoolwork and getting up for school.” She ordered her detained, concluding Grace was a “threat to (the) community” based on the prior charges of assault and theft. Grace was placed in secure detention at Children’s Village, in suburban Detroit, for about three weeks and then transferred to a residential treatment program within the facility.

The decision to detain Grace came while the state was operating under an order from Gov. Gretchen Whitmer to eliminate any form of detention or residential placement unless a young person posed a “substantial and immediate safety risk to others.”

At Monday’s hearing, Grace’s case coordinator at Children’s Village and the judge, reading from the caseworker’s report, said the girl has behaved well and has been engaged with the treatment program. She has met all the goals, was the “star resident” one week this month and is currently at the second of five stages in the program. Each stage takes about a month to complete, the case coordinator said, and she recommended that Grace complete the program. That would take another three and a half months, she said.

The court caseworker also recommended that Grace stay in the program. “They have made significant progress,” the caseworker, Ashley Bishop, said. “In speaking with mom, she reports they have been able to communicate much better, (Grace) is more self-aware, she is more serious, she is more thoughtful.”

“When I read this report, this is as good as it gets. … This is excellent. She is on point, she is doing well, she is engaged,” Brennan said. She later said, “The worst thing I can do is say you are doing great, now let’s get you home and watch the whole thing blow up.”

But Grace, speaking to the judge, said her good behavior indicated she was ready to go home. “I know I can control myself. … That altercation should not be defining who I should be now,” she said, adding: “I can be respectful. I can be obedient. I feel like that is being completely disregarded, no offense.”

She and her attorney argued she has been “deprived” of education and therapy. She has between 30 and 60 minutes of individual therapy twice a month and has had three joint sessions with her mother. Before being detained, she was meeting with a therapist twice weekly in addition to family therapy and academic tutoring, Grace and her mother have said.

“I believe placement in my home with the same, consistent therapy that I was getting beforehand, and love and support that will always be around me, will be a benefit for myself, my mom, my family and my community,” Grace said.

For school, Grace has been provided packets of material from the local district, which she said have been inadequate. “I am getting behind in my actual schooling while here. The schooling here is beneath my level of education,” she said. “And I know you may not seem to think this is a punishment, but in my heart, I feel the aching and the loss as if it were a punishment.”

 

For the first segment of the hearing, Brennan detailed Grace’s contentious relationship with her mother, during what she referred to as “the crazy years,” citing police records and child welfare reports mostly from 2017 and 2018. The reports describe Grace yelling, pushing, punching and biting her mother, and her mother’s inability to control her daughter, the judge said. She also mentioned Grace’s mental health treatment and troubles at school, including her theft of school technology, as well as social services support to help resolve conflicts between the mother and daughter.

The ProPublica investigation cited the police reports and other records about Grace’s behavior, including that she entered a court diversion program in 2018, at her mother’s request, for “incorrigibility.” At that time, Grace agreed to participate in counseling and not use electronic devices.

However, in filing the probation violation, the probation officer, who did not appear in court Monday, only cited incomplete schoolwork. She said Charisse reported that her daughter was not doing work, though the mother has said she spoke out of frustration. Charisse subsequently has said her daughter needed time to adjust to remote learning.

Brennan, who is running for reelection, said on Monday she had not felt it was safe to send Grace home after the probation violation because of the “numerous incidents of domestic violence,” and she didn’t want to put them in a “hot box” together when families generally were staying at home during the pandemic.

“She was not detained because she didn’t turn her homework in,” Brennan said at one point during the hearing, taking a long pause to look out at the courtroom. “She was detained because I found her to be a threat of harm to her mother based on everything I knew.”

At the original probation violation hearing in May, Grace’s mother testified that her daughter had not caused her any physical harm during the probation period. Grace said at Monday’s hearing that there had been no physical altercations between the two after the original assault charge in November and there is no police record of any.

In issuing the decision, Brennan said she wanted the girl to succeed, urging her to “give yourself a chance to follow through and finish something.”

She also cited the teenager’s work with a program at Children’s Village to prepare shelter dogs for adoption. “I want you to finish. The dogs want you to finish. Truly,” she said.

Biernat, Grace’s attorney, said after the hearing that he plans to appeal the decision. “We want her back at home with her mother,” he said.

As Grace and her mother hugged before saying goodbye, Charisse told her to “stay strong.”

With her head on her mother’s shoulder, Grace replied: “I can’t.”

ProPublica is using middle names for the teenager and her mother to protect their identities.

 

================================================================
Alecto, Megaera, and Tisiphone, I promised no further comment, and I’ll stick to that. I’ll just say anything you can do to lead this story toward a happy ending will be appreciated deeply.

The Furies and I will be back.

Share

  14 Responses to “Everyday Erinyes #225”

  1. Very well done, as always, JD. 35

    I don’t know enough about the case to render an opinion on the appropriateness if Judge Brennan’s decision.  However, one thing did concern me.  Brennan is running for reelection, and I have to wonder if trying to appear “tough on crime” added to the racial component.

    • I had a similar spin on the election piece of this.

    • Based on the reasoning Brennan makes pubic, I think her intentions are good.  But I also note she mentions nothing about family dynamics – and that leads me to believe she is ignorant of that and therefore not considering that in this case.  And in other cases?

      But that’s not the reason I featured it. I featured it because no one was talking about the difference being on probation makes to one’s civil rights. whether that’s because journalists presume the public is aware, or because they aren’t themselves aware and therefore see no reason to bring it up, I think they are in error.

  2. This is certainly interesting.  I find it hard to comment on the situation, beyond that, as e have something of a “She said/He said” thing going on.  And, any of tis kind of stuff is way more complex than our bits of knowledge can gather.

  3. Lots of lawsuits being filed for schools failing to provide special education services in students’ IEPs.  A 2017 study of the preschool to prison pipeline for black girls, which this sounds like an episode on that journey and more likely the longer she is detained.https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/race/news/2017/12/08/443972/preschool-prison-criminalization-black-girls/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=amprog_elq&utm_campaign=11&utm_content=42513
    Thanks Joanne–I hope justice prevails soon enough for her not to have her future and academic success impaired further by this judge’s choice at odds with the child’s best interest and educational rights.

  4. She can’t undo her past, and it seems to me, imho, that she is trying to do her school work, and to succeed. 
    I do hope that Grace can get over this hurdle, and that Brennan truly cares about this young lady and helps her, alongside with her mom.  

    Thanks, Joanne for post. 

  5. It doesn’t appear that the Judge was giving Grace any credit for improving, other than “You are blooming there” – or incentive to keep “blooming”.

    Looked pretty draconian to me.  Seems like there should be some moderation as a reward/incentive for her “blooming”.

  6. I like others never heard of this case/situation before today. 
    I feel that Grace was being denied the special ed classes and therapy that she needed. 
    She needs them both to help her move on/past this current challenge she is facing. 
    Hate to think that Grace’s future is being played with due to the Judge’s upcoming election. 
    Thanks Joanne 

  7. Somehow I find it hard to believe that a 15-year-old girl is “blooming” in juvenile detention; the reports on her “blooming” might be a touch biased and the judge is all too happy to accept it as is. But then judge Brennan seems to have a case of Trumpian denial, doubbling down instead of admitting to having made a mistake, no matter the cost to others. Her upcoming election is all that counts.

    It all sounds dreadfully familiar.

    • I must be a terrible communicator, because literally everyone missed the point I wanted to make and thought I had spelled out but obviously didn’t –  the point that the status of being on probation causes a person – any person – to lose some civil rights.  No one who is not on probation would be put into detention for missed homework.  (And had her probation run out while she was in I don’t believe they could keep her there.

      • You aren’t a terrible communicator.  With all the years I was involved as a prison volunteer, and before that, the idea that people on probation and parole have few civil rights by law, and virtually none because of abuse of the system by POs, DAs, and judges, is so obvious to me that I neglected to mention it.  I should have. 47

        • Thanks – It is obvious to you of course – ad clear, though less obvious to me – and virtually unknown to most people, which is why I wanted to push it.  I suppose in a way it’s a good thing that so many people have no need to know.

          • I agree.  Most have no inkling that our criminal justice system specialized in injustice.  Even though it’s good that so many have no need to know, all need to know in order to correct it! 13

      • You made the point perfectly, Joanne, but it only comes to light when judges like Brennan, and all the others TomCat mentions, abuse the fact that people lose some civil rights when on probation. And Brennan really took it to the limit.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.