Barack Obama’s failure to close the GOP Gulag at Gitmo is one of the “broken campaign promises” that have troubled and drawn ire from many on the left, myself included. When I’m wrong, I say so. Recent documents from WikiLeaks indicate that Obama’s honest attempts to keep his promise were stifled as the actions of vile Republicans and cowardly Democrats tied his hands.
Two years after the newly minted Obama administration moved to undo what had become one of the most controversial legacies of the George W. Bush presidency by ordering the closure of the prison camps at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, a trove of State Department documents made public by the website WikiLeaks is providing new information about why that effort failed.
Protesters in front of the White House unfurled a banner demanding that the prison camps at Guantanamo be closed during a commemoration Jan. 11 of the 9th anniversary of the detention center’s founding. (Olivier Douliery / Abaca Press / MCT)
Key among the factors, the cables suggest: Congress’ refusal to allow any of the captives to be brought to the United States.
In cable after cable sent to the State Department in Washington, American diplomats make it clear that the unwillingness of the United States to resettle a single detainee in this country — even from among 17 ethnic Muslim Uighurs considered enemies of China’s communist government — made other countries reluctant to take in detainees.
Europe balked and said the United States should go first. Yemen at one point proposed the United States move the detainees from Cuba to America’s SuperMax prison in the Colorado Rockies. Saudi Arabia’s king suggested the military plant micro-chips in Guantanamo captives before setting them free.
A January 2009 cable from Paris is a case in point: France’s chief diplomat on security matters insisted, the cable said, that, as a precondition of France’s resettling Guantanamo captives the United States wants to let go, "the U.S. must agree to resettle some of these same LOW-RISK DETAINEES in the U.S.” In the end, France took two.
Closing the Guantanamo detention center had been a key promise of the Obama presidential campaign, and the new President Barack Obama moved quickly to fulfill it.
Just two days after taking the oath of office, on Jan. 22, 2009, Obama signed an executive order instructing the military to close Guantanamo within a year. European countries were effusive in their praise.
But as the second anniversary of that order passed Saturday, the prison camps remain open, and the prospects of their closure appear dim. Prosecutors are poised to ramp up the military trials that Obama once condemned, and the new Republican chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Rep. Buck McKeon of California, last week said the U.S. should grow the population to perhaps 800 from the current 173.
Many factors worked to thwart Obama’s plans to close the camps — from a tangled bureaucracy to fears that released detainees would become terrorists. But Congress’ prohibition on resettling any of the detainees in the United States hamstrung the administration’s global search for countries willing to take the captives in…[emphasis added]
Inserted from <Common Dreams>
I remember the early days when the most moderate Republicans screamed NIMBY while the more typical ones accused Obama, who they knew is really a Muslim himself, was planning to release terrorists in the US as part of his Kenyan plot to sap our precious bodily fluids. At the same time, Democrats’ spines turned to jelly as they raced to sign on to the Republican initiative. From both parties, it was a disgusting display.
Although there remain many issues, over which I am dissatisfied with Obama’s performance in office, I must take this occasion to apologize for my intense criticism of him on this issue, and say thank you to Julian Assange for setting the record straight.
4 Responses to “Is Guantanamo Obama’s Fault?”
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Sorry dude but The President is commander in chief and calling them “enemy combatants” does not make them not POW’s. During WWII we had many POW camps stateside. The president is the president now and he owns GITMO until he decides otherwise.
Mark, that’s something I had not considered. Could it be that he does not want to fight his own party in Congress?
He is the leader of his party and he wouldn’t be fighting the center of his party but the conservative left. I think the liberal and progressives would support his move to close Gitmo and try these men now 10 years held under the rules of our constitution. National security issues could be discussed in a closed court while the trial in general could be public. Courtrooms are cleared all the time except for the main stage players when sensitive information is presented. We have had trials go one for months and months so this would be a slow deliberate process but not out of the norm. Any defendant found not guilty could then also petition for compensation for their imprisonment. The biggest fear I think is what to do with these men if acquitted or after they serve a sentence.
That is a bridge to far for the moment. First get their status changed to that of defendant in criminal proceedings or to POW’s. Give them their day in court and then we can figure out what and where they go.
Mark, the problem remains what to do with them if the court releases them. What I meant in my last response is that Democrats voted overwhelmingly with Republicans to prevent prisoners in Gitmo from entering the US.