Bill Maher from 2/14

 Posted by at 8:55 am  Politics
Feb 152020
 

It’s that time of week again, so here are 3 fine video clips, from Bill’s show last night.  Enjoy!

Monologue: Rich Daddy Pays For It

Did Bill have the interaction between Fuhrer Trump* and AG Barrf pegged, or what? Liberals are Calling Bloomberg a racist, because he’s a racist. Sadly, if he wins the nomination, and it’s him or Trump*, he’s MY racist. How sad that would be?!

One-on-One with Amy Klobuchar

Amy is my fourth choice, after Liz, Bernie, and Pete. I doubt that she would be doing as well as she is, had ABC not given her an inordinate amount of exposure during the NH debate to minimize the progressive candidates, who deserved that time more.

Robosexuals

These Robosexuals must not be Republicans. Republicans are Ammosexuals. Republican women like large caliber weapons for obvious reasons. Republican men like small caliber weapons for equally obvious reasons. Trump* needs a BB gun.

An excellent show!

RESIST!!

Share

  9 Responses to “Bill Maher from 2/14”

  1. W/watch ltr..
    Thanks, Tom

  2. I ain’t so sure about Bloomberg, but I like Bernie! I was sad to see Warren fade, but I am starting to like Klobuchar. Sanders-Klobuchar 2020? I’d brave drunken Cleveland Browns fans to vote for that ticket.

  3. Bill – Monologue – Geraldo picking Trump’s brain? I’d think his nose would be easier (and more sanitary). On Bloomberg – what TC said.

    Amy – After Liz and Bernie, I also have Amy and Pete, but it’s a virtual tie for me. (Jefferson may have been 5’4″ … but Madison was shorter, and may not have been the only one. 5’1″ or 5’2″ Madison was, I forget which. Nonetheless a giant of a patriot.) I’ve said this before, but I’ll say it again – She needs (every Dem candidate needs) to have a plan for Donald not leaving, but the public – including Bill’s audience – does NOT need to know it in advance – so as not to throw away the element of surprise. And I think that’s what she and every Dem candidate should be saying, and especially to Bill.

    New Rule – This really has nothing to do with sex. It has to do with relationships. Relationships are messy. Even the most honest people can’t be trusted all the time – and that is especially true if you yourself have not been explicit and honest about your wants and needs. Because humans are not psychic. (OK, robots aren’t psychic either, but they can be programmed to do a far better imitation of it than most humans can – viz. Siri and Alexa.) Digisexuality and Robosexuality are about having sex WITHOUT RELATIONSHIPS. And I do agree with Bill that it doesn’t bode well for the human race continuing to reporoduce. If we had some kind of wealth/income equality so that everyone who wanted a robot could have one it might – because then, reproduction would be done primarily by people who DO want relationships, DO want to relate to other humans, and therefore .have and/or develop traits like empathy and willingness to listen. And these would also be the people who would be the best parents on account of those traits. But that won’t happen. Sure, we would be taking the rich and self absorbed out of the gene pool, but not the poor and self-absorbed, who would be able to afford neither robots nor birth control. Not our best people. Bill makes this very funny, but it really isn’t. It could, for instance, be a boon to the human race by getting Incels robots and getting them to leave human women ALONE for God’s sake.

    • I’m starting to appreciate why so many folks think clowns are freaking scary!

      • Damn it, Nameless!  There goes breakfast again! ðŸ¤®

      • Whiteface clowns (they are not the only kind – there are 4 or 5 genres – whiteface includes but is not limited to mimes) have theor origin in representing the dead. Hence the white face. Some purists still feel thatwhiteface clowns should not talk white in persona. Back in the seventies a group of us at my church tried our hands at it in a “Clowns for Christ” group. It was very interesting. But it’s not ridiculous to feel some fear – primal, but not ridiculous.

  4. Bill #1: Barrf – “I’m drawing a line in the swamp” and so will the DNC if they allow Blumberg to buy the election and nominate him their candidate in the knowledge he is a racist and the leader of NY/Wallstreet establishment.

    Bill #3: Perhaps this robosexuality or digisexuality is nature’s Peter principle in evolution, a natural stop to mankind’s overabundant procreative efforts. Despite its efforts, nature hasn’t been able to come up with diseases lately that reduce earth’s human population by half, like the plague once did, so now all it’s got left is playing with human psychology, albeit a far less efficient and more gentle way than the world war she has in store for us.

  5. Did watch Bill’s show last night.
    I enjoyed watching Amy. She has been staying in the race. She had some good comments in how she would address tRump.

  6. Thanks and Sunday Hugs to all! 23

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.