Nov 152010
 

America’s strategic nuclear arsenal is a holdover from Cold War.  Since the demise of the Soviet Union, our need for them has greatly diminished, so reducing their numbers by treaty is a win for everyone except for the military contractors who maintain and replace them and the states with military bases where the silos are located.  Sadly, those are mostly red states.

15minutemanPresident Obama has made ratification of the New START nuclear arms treaty with Russia a top priority for the upcoming lame duck session of Congress, saying the treaty is “essential to the country’s national security.” An extension of the original treaty negotiatied by President Ronald Reagan, the START treaty responsibly reduces U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals by one-fourth. It has secured the “unanimous support of America’s military leadership,” thirty former Republican and Democratic national security officials, and almost all of the 67 votes needed for ratification in the Senate.

Despite the overwhelming support, a “tiny fringe” of right-wing “experts” are ginning up myths about the treaty. One such mouthpiece is Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC). Claiming to be “open-minded” on the treaty, Graham told host Christine Amanpour on ABC’s This Week today that he could not support the treaty “in its current condition” because of “two obstacles” — nuclear modernization and missile defense…

…Watch it:

 

The only problem with Graham’s “stumbling blocks” is that they don’t actually exist. While “security experts” like Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ), Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), and former Bush administration Ambassador John Bolton insist that Obama is “risking our security” by supposedly not focusing on modernization of America’s nuclear arsenal, the actual rocket scientists of an independent defense advisory panel determined that not only are the weapons completely reliable, but that our current “nuclear warheads could be extended for decades, with no anticipated loss in effectiveness.” To make sure this remains the case, the Obama administration devoted $7 billion [Murdoch delinked] to maintain the nuclear-weapons stockpile — $600 million more than Congress approved last year and 10 percent more than what the Bush administration spent… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Think Progress>

Obama is already going too far in the deal he negotiated with Republicans to approve the treaty.  Republicans do not keep their word, and are trying to extort more perques for their corporate cronies and red state coffers.  Once again Republicans care nothing for national security.

Share

  2 Responses to “Will Republicans Block START?”

  1. Lindsay poo knows about as much about nuclear weapons as I do. Dipshit. We already have enough nukes to blow up the world 3 times over.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.