Huge Hat Tip to Mitch, who inspired this post!
Mitch was kind enough to recently share a delightful video titled “Birds Can Dance!”
Despite my hearing deficit, I thought it was very cool! Although it was the creative and complex editing that made them look like they were dancing, it was very entertaining.
But it caused me to start wondering: Can birds actually dance? So I started searching, and it turns out the answer is a scientifically proven YES!
But first we need to recognize that this was the answer to the scientific definition of what “Dance” means, because it’s been long believed that only humans have the ability to dance.
“Dancing” is an untutored, spontaneous response where the animal moves on the beat, matching motion to music. The animal cannot have a trainer. There cannot be a human in the room whose moves it copies. It cannot be rewarded for its movements. It cannot spend weeks exposed to the same tune. And when the music changes tempo, it has to change with it, sticking to the beat. So the “dance” is triggered by sound, but the moves come from within the animal itself.
And we need to realize that none of the animals that science has decided can truly “dance” are going to give any of the contestants on “Dancing With the Stars” a run for their money.
But still, they have provided not only a lot of entertainment for the masses – but also served science well. So how did a sulphur-crested cockatoo named Snowball get to be a main participant in a science research project?
It all began with a YouTube video of him boogieing to “Everybody (Back Street’s Back) by the Back Street Boys … I kid you not!
A colleague of Dr. Aniruddh Patel, then a neurobiologist at the Neurosciences Institute in La Jolla, CA, (now a professor at Tufts) asked him to watch the video of Snowball grooving, and Dr. Patel reports his reaction:
“I still remember it. I was staring at the screen and my jaw just hit the floor. I thought, ‘Is this real? Could this actually be happening?’ Within minutes I’d written Snowball’s owner.”
Snowball had been taken to a bird shelter in northern Indiana because the daughter, who was the primary caretaker, began college. The dad and daughter also provided Irena Schulz, director of the shelter, with a CD by the Back Street Boys, and told her to play it if Snowball looked bored.
One day Irena cranked up the CD and was astounded at what happened next. She immediately grabbed a video of Snowball’s strutting his moves on the back of a chair and submitted it to YouTube – where it almost immediately went viral!
A few months later she got a call from Dr. Patel who was astounded by the birds dancing. “Let’s design an experiment to see if this is real.” Ms. Schulz, who had previously worked as a molecular biologist, agreed: “Yeah, let’s do that!”
They made 11 different versions of “Everybody,” all at the same pitch, but changed the tempos from 2.5% to 20% faster and then slower than the original.
They played each version and videotaped Snowball’s response, and then analyzed each video frame by frame.
Snowball wasn’t perfect (and was actually pretty bad at the slower tempos). But he was on the beat at least 60% of the time – very much like a toddler when learning to dance to music. Statistical analysis of the data confirmed that Snowball was, in fact, dancing in time with the music.
To my mind, equally impressive is that Snowball had developed a repertoire of 14 distinct moves – none of which were taught to him. He created them on his own. To be tabulated as a distinct move it had to occur on two separate occasions. Let’s enjoy them:
At the same time Dr. Patel was studying Snowball, another research group at Harvard was studying Alex, an African grey parrot, who also danced. They also concluded that Alex’s movements were synchronized with the beat of the music, and did not occur merely by chance. They wondered what feature(s) these animals shared with humans that enabled them to dance.
One of the researchers, Adena Schachner (then a graduate student at Harvard) said: “It had recently been theorized that vocal mimicry (the ability to acquire sounds through learning) might be related to the ability to move to a beat. The particular theory was that natural selection for vocal mimicry resulted in a brain mechanism that was also needed for moving to a beat. This theory made a really specific prediction: Only animals that can mimic sound should be able to keep a beat.”
Schachner realized that since people loved posting videos of their critters “performing,” she decided YouTube would be a wonderfully unique research resource.
She collected over 5,000 YouTube videos of wildly different animals (dogs, cats, chimps, orangutans, horses, etc.) and analyzed them frame-by-frame to see it they were moving to the beat. She narrowed the “dancers” down to 39 animals. Twentynine of them were in the parrot family, comprised of 14 different species. The rest were Asian elephants.
The one feature that all animals who can dance share with humans is vocal mimicry or vocal learning. Surprisingly enough our closest relatives (apes and monkeys) lack this ability. While they can certainly learn from one another, they don’t mimic each other’s sounds. And Schachner found no videos showing they could inherently move to a beat.
I doubt Dr. Patel ever thought that YouTube, besides being entertaining, would prove that a bird’s variety of movements would indicate a type of cerebral flexibility that suggests his creative choreography is not simply “a brainstem reflex to sound. [But] actually a complex cognitive act that involves choosing among different types of possible movement options. It’s exactly how we think of human dancing.”
As always, the fun part of science is finding answers. So now, thanks to Patel’s new paper, we learned we are not the only ones dancing to the beat: “Spontaneity and diversity of movement to music are not uniquely human.”
And Snowball, who is only 25 years old, could be providing answers for another half-century since Cockatoos in captivity can live to be about 75.
I can’t help but wonder what Freddie Mercury would think if he knew that a cockatoo dancing to his signature song got over 8 MILLION clicks. So let’s let Snowball dance his way out to Queen’s “Another One Bites the Dust”.
11 Responses to “Friday Fun: Can Birds Really Dance?”
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
How fascinating!
They seem to love the music, and love dancing to the beat.
He’s a happy and beautiful bird.
Absolutely wonderful (and precious) videos of him dancing. How delightful !!!
Snowball is fantastic with his jamming, and a better dancer than me, that’s for sure.
Thank you, Nameless for smiles today with watching Snowball dance.
Thanks, Mitch for sharing.
Pat, don’t feel like the Lone Ranger – Snowball is certainly a better dancer than I am. In my case it’s not the ability for vocal mimcry which is deficient (not that I claim tobe able to so impressions), but the large motor coordination and also my balance which both suck. I never mastered roller skates (and I did trybut the best I cold do was move wit one and then only about the length of one step), and – y’all know I love opera, and opera houses are notorious for having “nosebleed sections – I could not get to my seat in one of those without hanging on to a seat back at every step of the way. Do a drgree I could train out of that – after three months of a PE course I always referred to as “Ballet Appreciation” (because, com one, at seventeen or more if you’ve never done those moves your body will never be able to) I was actually able to walk to one of those seays – gingerly and nervously. But if you have to train that hard for something you have to keep up the training or you lose it.
Fortunately my small motor coordination is much better, so I’m not a complete and total klitz.
Thans for the sducation!
I must, first, thank Nameless for putting this out to still ore people who may not have been familiar with the story/issue. However, it is my belief that while the ostrich and flamingo “dances” may have been sped up in editing, that the res were not. The western grebes running on water were certainly not. they are famous for this part of their mating behavior.
I stink at dancing, also, at least the type with prescribed steps. The loose-goosy dancing of the ’70’s and ’80’s worked quite well for me.
P.S.: I will be away from my computer for the next few days, as we are doing a house swap with our daughter, in N.J., as of tomorrow.
Safe travels, and have fun!
If you go to any beaches, Tell Ocean City/Atlantic City, and Margate I said hi.
Take care!
Thanks for the heads up! Have a great time and be safe!
Hmmm…. Moving from Florida to New Jersey for part of the summer. You’re not stalking Donnie, are you?
Have a wonderful trip! (And if you did happen to encounter The Former Guy, flip him the Bird for me!)
Hope you have a safe and enjoyable trip. Mitch.
Ditto what Nameless said to do if you run into the former guy.
Take care.
Thanks so much for a very interesting and entertaining Friday fun, Nameless.
As always, your article got me thinking and I realised I think the definition of “dance” given here may be a bit narrow.
In Mitch’s bird-dancing video, snippets of long courtship dances were shown of some bird species that are known for their on and intricately “choreographed” mating rituals. I wouldn’t presume to call the motions of a single male bird of paradise a “dance”. But, for instance, the dance of two black-footed albatrosses performing a dance to their inner music that could rival those danced at the Tudor and French courts comes close. These birds will actually decide on a life-long mate by dancing together to test their compatibility. They will often dance with several different partners until finding their perfect match.
But, of course, their “dance” is not nearly as entertaining as Snowball’s is. 😊
I can appreciate some frustration with the scientists’ definition of “dance”. But given my science background, I can fully understand the parameters they used.
I imagine a lot of animals have some type of rhythmic movements. But the sine qua non to fit the definition of “dance” is that it has to follow the beat of the music.
Since it’s not measurable, science, unfortunately, can’t give them any credit for “inner music” – no matter how wonderfully beautiful it is.
Thanks Nameless (and Mitch–hope you enjoyed your travels and NJ) for this marvelous example of how technology provides a repository, albeit not representative, sample for preliminary research doable even in times of Covid.