Experts in autocracies have pointed out that it is, unfortunately, easy to slip into normalizing the tyrant, hence it is important to hang on to outrage. These incidents which seem to call for the efforts of the Greek Furies (Erinyes) to come and deal with them will, I hope, help with that. As a reminder, though no one really knows how many there were supposed to be, the three names we have are Alecto, Megaera, and Tisiphone. These roughly translate as “unceasing,” “grudging,” and “vengeful destruction.”
This sounds like something out of a fantastic hidden-object-puzzle-adventure (“HOPA”) computer game – such as “The Andersen Accounts.” But apparently, even though supernatural powers are not in the offing, there is some promise of getting tattoos to be more than just art.
================================================================
Dynamic tattoos promise to warn wearers of health threats
Carson J. Bruns, University of Colorado Boulder
In the sci-fi novel “The Diamond Age” by Neal Stephenson, body art has evolved into “constantly shifting mediatronic tattoos” – in-skin displays powered by nanotech robopigments. In the 25 years since the novel was published, nanotechnology has had time to catch up, and the sci-fi vision of dynamic tattoos is starting to become a reality.
The first examples of color-changing nanotech tattoos have been developed over the past few years, and they’re not just for body art. They have a biomedical purpose. Imagine a tattoo that alerts you to a health problem signaled by a change in your biochemistry, or to radiation exposure that could be dangerous to your health.
You can’t walk into a doctor’s office and get a dynamic tattoo yet, but they are on the way. Early proof-of-concept studies provide convincing evidence that tattoos can be engineered, not only to change color, but to sense and convey biomedical information, including the onset of cancer.
Signaling biochemical changes
In 2017, researchers tattooed pigskin, which had been removed from the pig, with molecular biosensors that use color to indicate sodium, glucose or pH levels in the skin’s fluids.
In 2019, a team of researchers expanded on that study to include protein sensing and developed smartphone readouts for the tattoos. This year, they also showed that electrolyte levels could be detected with fluorescent tattoo sensors.
In 2018, a team of biologists developed a tattoo made of engineered skin cells that darken when they sense an imbalance of calcium caused by certain cancers. They demonstrated the cancer-detecting tattoo in living mice.
UV radiation sensors
My lab is looking at tech tattoos from a different angle. We are interested in sensing external harms, such as ultraviolet radiation. UV exposure in sunlight and tanning beds is the main risk factor for all types of skin cancer. Nonmelanoma skin cancers are the most common malignancies in the U.S., Australia and Europe.
To help address this problem, we developed an invisible tattoo ink that turns blue only in UV light, alerting you when your skin needs protection. The tattoo ink contains a UV-activated dye inside of a plastic nanocapsule less than a micron in diameter – or thousandth of a millimeter – about the same size as an ordinary tattoo pigment.
The nanocapsule is needed to make the color-changing tattoo particles large enough. If tattoo pigments are too small, the immune system rapidly clears them from the skin and the tattoo disappears. They are implanted using tattoo machines in the same way as regular tattoos, but they last for only several months before they start to degrade from UV exposure and other natural processes and fade, requiring a “booster” tattoo.
I served as the first human test subject for these tattoos. I created “solar freckles” on my forearm – invisible spots that turned blue under UV exposure and reminded me when to wear sunscreen. My lab is also working on invisible UV-protective tattoos that would absorb UV light penetrating through the skin, like a long-lasting sunscreen just below the surface. We’re also working on “thermometer” tattoos using temperature-sensitive inks. Ultimately, we believe tattoo inks could be used to prevent and diagnose disease.
Temporary high-tech tattoos
Temporary transfer tattoos are also undergoing a high-tech revolution. Wearable electronic tattoos that can sense electrophysiological signals like heart rate and brain activity or monitor hydration and glucose levels from sweat are under development. They can even be used for controlling mobile devices, for example shuffling a music playlist at the touch of a tattoo, or for luminescent body art that lights up the skin.
The advantage of these wearable tattoos is that they can use battery-powered electronics. The disadvantage is that they are much less permanent and comfortable than traditional tattoos. Likewise, electronic devices that go underneath the skin are being developed by scientists, designers and biohackers alike, but they require invasive surgical procedures for implantation.
Tattoos injected into the skin offer the best of both worlds: minimally invasive, yet permanent and comfortable. New needle-free tattooing methods that fire microscopic ink droplets into the skin are now in development. Once perfected they will make tattooing quicker and less painful.
Ready for everyday use?
The color-changing tattoos in development are also going to open the door to a new kind of dynamic body art. Now that tattoo colors can be changed by an electromagnetic signal, you’ll soon be able to “program” your tattoo’s design, or switch it on and off. You can proudly display your neck tattoo at the motorcycle rally and still have clear skin in the courtroom.
As researchers develop dynamic tattoos, they’ll need to study the safety of the high-tech inks. As it is, little is known about the safety of the more than 100 different pigments used in normal tattoo inks. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has not exercised regulatory authority over tattoo pigments, citing other competing public health priorities and a lack of evidence of safety problems with the pigments. So U.S. manufacturers can put whatever they want in tattoo inks and sell them without FDA approval.
So far, there is no evidence that tattoos cause cancer, and one study even found that black tattoos protect against UV-induced skin cancer. Still, many tattoo inks contain or degrade into substances that are known to be hazardous, and health complications including infection, allergy and granuloma have been found in about 2% of tattoos. More research is needed to understand the long-term effects of nano- and microimplants in the skin in general.
A wave of high-tech tattoos is slowly upwelling, and it will probably keep rising for the foreseeable future. When it arrives, you can decide to surf or watch from the beach. If you do climb on board, you’ll be able to check your body temperature or UV exposure by simply glancing at one of your tattoos.
Carson J. Bruns, Assistant Professor, University of Colorado Boulder
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
================================================================
AMT, in 75 years, it never once crossed my mind that a tattoo might be something I might one day consider. But here it is. If a tattoo could actually give me a health warning – and I can think of situations where that could go way past handy, all the way to life-saving – I’m on board.
The Furies and I will be back.
15 Responses to “Everyday Erinyes #234”
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Great news! and information.
WoW! I think this is wonderful !
Thanks, Joanne for getting this out here.
w/be passing on to friends.
That’s just crazy and amazing, thanks.
Thanks Joanne. Intriguing and the risks of infection that come with any time the skin is penetrated by anything would be worth it for the life threatening conditions that could be identified, much like surgeries for those reasons are worth it (and potentially be covered by health insurance once no longer considered experimental). Not as sure risk vs. benefits worth it for cosmetic reasons.
Extremely interesting!
I did a cursory search, and didn’t find any review articles in the medical literature. I’m wondering who would have regulating control. Would this be considered a medical procedure?
Obviously it’s much different than wearing a smartwatch that can monitor heart rates and rhythms, as they are only external. But I can certainly see a huge application from a medical perspective.
I’m sure the FDA would have to me involved, because of the proximity of “chemical” and “human body.” But maybe not them alone. It’s a brilliant question.
Tattoos have been used in a more practical sense than for beautification before, which may be the reason this daughter of a holocaust survivor has such an aversion against them. However, the practical uses for technically improved tattoos are certainly worth our interest.
Personally, not so much the UV-sensitive tattoo, telling me when to slap on some sunscreen, as I live in a country with the highest incident of skin cancers and I need to slap on sunscreen even in winter if I’m out for longer than 10 minutes. But tattoos which can screen other health issues, such as the temporary high tech tattoos, could definitively be worth pursuing further.
I had no relatives involved with the Holocaust (that I know about) but am old enough to be aware of that use and repelled by it, as you are. Another use of them which was off-putting was that the Ainu – a tribe in Japan but not of it (they appear to be genetically as little related as possible to the Japanese and both still be human) tattooed women’s faces to make them ugly to pirates and thus prevent yheir being kidnapped by them. I am not making this up. Many reasons why I have never been a fan of tattoos. But this put a new aspect on the practice for me.
Interesting story. Never knew that much about tattoos. I remember seeing them in my younger years when I lived by he beach. Use to seeing ;lots of young sailors having them. Plus seeing the old Hell’s Angel’s on their Harley Davidsons with lot of tattoos.
It’s amazing how they’re creating these tattoos that can be a benefit to people’s health. Who would of ever thought they could create such a thing??
I’ve grown up thinking that tattoos were totally bad for your skin. Never thinking they could be a benefit.
Excellent post. Thanks Joanne
This is TC testing your ID,
This is TC. Second Test.
This is TC. Problem Solved.
I have five tattoos and all were medical. They were used to focus mt radiation treatment in the right spot.
I too thank you for taking care of the problem. TC and that goes for you too Joanne.
how cool.