The Way Forward on Tax Scam

 Posted by at 12:39 pm  Politics
Dec 202017
 

It’s a done deal.  Less than five minutes ago, the House passed the Republican Tax Scam, and it’s on the way to their Fuhrer’s desk.  For the way forward, we have a good head start, because the Republican Tax Scam is more unpopular than any tax increase has been.  Moving along, we need to hang this albatross on the neck of every Republican lawmaker at every level of government, as well as every Republican donor and corporate criminal, whose greedy threats drove passage of this disaster.

GOPVoting

Foremost on many activists’ minds is how to make politicians rue the day they voted for this scam. The folks who organized the big Tax March last April are about to launchrepealthetrumptax.org [sic] to coordinate 100 days of “accountability” events around the country, beginning in early January. Their aim: Make a “yea” vote on this stinker a mark of shame for candidates trying to get reelected in 2018 and 2020.

We should also be working to hold corporations that supported the tax bill accountable. Lobby groups representing nearly every large firm in the country, from the Chamber of Commerce to the Business Roundtable, fought full-throttle for this monstrosity, spewing one absurd claim after another.

Meanwhile, according to Marketwatch, corporations have been preparing to spend their tax savings not on job-creating investments or wage hikes but on stock buybacks, which will inflate the value of their CEOs’ stock-based pay…

Inserted from <The Nation>

Rachel Maddow gives us some excellent background on this mess.

Rachel explained that only 7% of Americans think the Republican Tax Scam is a middle class tax cut.  That’s a great start, and in the end, 60 percent of Americans get a tax INCREASE!  Are you ready?  Campaign 2018 just started in earnest.

RESIST THE REPUBLICAN REICH!!

Share
Dec 202017
 

It’s another crazy day in the CatBox.  I had to split my grocery order into two deliveries, one from each of two locations, the Amazon warehouse and New Seasons Market.  The larger of the two from Amazon has already come, and it was so well packed and organized that putting everything away was relatively painless.  The New Seasons order is only three items, but one of them is a key ingredient for tonight’s supper.  That will come between 10:00 and Noon.  Tonight is a shower night, and I’m planning a special supper for WWW: bagels with lox, cream cream cheese, and onions!  Oy Purrrr!!!

Jig Zone Puzzle:

Today’s took me 3:22 (average 5:12).  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Short Takes:

From The Atlantic: Representative Tom Cole of Oklahoma put it a bit more succinctly. “God made Republicans to cut taxes,” he quipped to reporters.

Trump hasn’t even signed it in OUR blood yet, and Republicans are already trying to blame their albatross on somebody else. RESIST!!

From Washington Post: The White House has taken down a popular online tool created by President Barack Obama’s administration that allowed the public to create online petitions, some of which required an official response.

All of the petitions, including one that called on President Trump to release his tax returns — the most popular, with more than a million signatures — disappeared from Petitions.WhiteHouse.Gov as part of what a statement https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/ said was part of a maintenance effort to improve its performance.

The statement said that the site, as well as all of its existing petitions, would be restored by the end of January.

“All existing petitions and associated signatures have been preserved and will be available when the site is relaunched,” the note said. “Following the site’s relaunch, petitions that have reached the required number of signatures will begin receiving responses.”

I’ll bet a buck that, when the end of January comes, there will be a problem that will cause a "slight" delay in getting it back up. That delay will continue until Drumpfenfarten is no longer Fuhrer. Any takers? RESIST!!

From NY Times: The Democratic wave that rose on Election Day in Virginia last month delivered a final crash on the sand Tuesday when a Democratic challenger defeated a Republican incumbent by a single vote, leaving the Virginia House of Delegates evenly split between the two parties.

The victory by Shelly Simonds, a school board member in Newport News, was a civics lesson in every-vote-counts as she won 11,608 to 11,607 in a recount conducted by local election officials. [emphasis added]

How many times have you heard lazy lefties or third party fools say their vote doesn’t matter, because it will make no difference anyway. Bullshit! RESIST!!

Cartoon:

1220Cartoon

Share
Dec 202017
 

Within the past few days, JD mentioned Ady Barkan, a father, a husband, a son who has been stricken with ALS but is not taking things quietly.  Ady Barkan is an activist who was arrested on his birthday very recently for taking on the Republican party’s tax scam legislation.  Did I say ‘legislation’?  That is too legitimate sounding, too dignified for this piece of crap bill.  Thanks JD for the tip.

Disabled Activist Ady Barkan: ‘Republicans Don’t Have The Heart To Look Me In The Eye’

Ady Barkan is a fierce activist fighting for democracy, health care, and his own life. He suffers from ALS and will need a ventilator shortly to keep him alive and breathing while his 18-month old son grows up. Barkan is also the campaign director for Fed Up and Campaign for Democracy, and has been fighting in…

/

 

Posted from Crooks and Liars

 

So, what are YOU going to do?

As Ady says, it may not be today, but the People have the moral high ground now and must continue to fight for the political high ground in 2018.  In the end, it is the People who will win!

To honour Ady’s request, that website is:

www.stopgoptaxscam.com

Share
Dec 192017
 

(This article was written by, and is printed with permission from, Freya H., a regular commenter here, and a regular commenter and poster on Care2, and highly valued at both places.)

I attended the Women’s Congress in Detroit, MI, in late October, and I am glad that I went. I
learned a lot about numerous issues, as well as what citizens can do to make their voices
heard, and did some serious networking. Now is a dark time for women – indeed, for everybody
who is not a white, straight, rich male U.S. citizen – in this country thanks to the Trump regime
and a Republican-dominated Congress. Conservative forces seek to divide and conquer by
separating the struggles of women, blacks, unions, Latinos, the LGBTQ community,
immigrants and so on. The purpose of the Women’s Congress was, obviously, to focus on what
issues affect women, and how to handle them; however, much of what was discussed applies
to everybody who does not benefit from this country’s current regime.

Each morning featured inspiring speakers, followed by breakout sessions focusing on different
issues: immigration, reproductive rights, mass incarceration, police brutality, how to get more
women elected to office, fighting sexual assault, opposing the gun lobby, getting youth
involved, et cetera. I attended several sessions that I felt would expose me to people with
whom I could network, and give me information and ideas I could bring back to Atlanta.

Michigan, like Georgia, has a major problem with gerrymandering. Fortunately, I met several
women who are deeply involved in that fight. I talked with many women, some leaders and
organizers, some rank-and-file activists, all involved in various issues. From both presenters
and those I met I gathered not just contacts and names of organizations but also tips and
suggestions. I contributed to a couple of the sessions, and even got a couple ideas that may
work. Meanwhile, the crock pot of my mind is still simmering and mixing what I took away from
the convention, so my role is just getting started.

Even before the Congress was over, many attendees were looking forward to the next one.
Indeed, this Congress was merely a beginning, a springboard to get activism and action going,
to make nationwide connections between local organizations so we can share ideas and
experiences. We are in for a long, hard fight that will take the efforts of many. Perseverance
always pays off in the end.

One strategy mentioned in several talks is storytelling. This makes an important issue personal
because people will think about how some law or policy could affect them, or their loved ones,
or their friends, or their neighborhood. Realizing that one has a personal stake in who
represents us in government at all levels, and what sort of laws get passed, motivates people
to contact their legislators, promote petitions, take part in demonstrations, and most
importantly, to vote. Doug Jones’ upset victory in Alabama shows just what happens when
progressives go to the polls in large numbers.

Another thing I learned is, regardless of the issue, you need to get face-to-face with people.
Social media are helpful, but they don’t work by themselves because you need to get personal
in order to build relationships. You should surround yourself with subject matter experts and let
them guide you. Don’t assume that the people around you know all these problems you are
fighting exist. Listen to others in order to lead, build creative solutions, and “lean in.”
Here is what else I took away from presentations at the convention:

Hyperlocal Activism: How to Create Successful Neighborhood Groups

Political activism should focus as much on local as on national races; indeed, it is better to start
small. If you have 10 interested people, you can probably get a meeting with your state
representative or senator. Find out where your legislators stand on issues so you can can
prepare your questions. When you have a meeting with a legislator, focus on just one issue and
ask for just one task.

Have Post-It brainstorming sessions. The Action Network has a helpful tool for planning events, letter campaigns and fundraisers. You can sign up for a free account, then click on the “Start Organizing” button in the right top corner.

Attend the meetings of other activist groups to get ideas and contacts. Tell your contacts about
upcoming actions so you can get more people involved. If you are on Meetup, use the hashtag
#Resist to find out if there is a group near you, or a Huddle from the Women’s March. If you
have a Facebook account, use it to keep in touch with people and organizations. Yahoo Groups
and GroupsIO are useful too. Once you get an action network established, it will grow.

To get youth involved, talk to civics clubs at high schools. Learn what progressive-minded clubs
are at your local colleges. Parents in your network may have kids who are approaching, or have
reached, voting age. Make activism a family affair by getting the next generation involved.

This is What Democracy Looks Like! Engaging New Voters in 2018

New voters are not just young, white, middle class Millennials. They include blacks, Hispanics/
Latinos/Chicanos, Asians, Pacific Islanders, Native Americans and new citizens. Let young
people lead their way by asking what issues concern them. Explain why it’s restrictive to have a
picture ID, and work on breaking down other barriers to voting. Close the disconnects between
population segments. Coalitions cross many divides, including race, age, religion, gender
identity and immigration status.

Millennials consume information on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and other on-line sources. The
Internet has rewritten the rules of political engagement. To get more people voting, we need to
communicate in a way that resonates with our intended audience. Focus on issues that concern
them: technology, student debt, self employment, gig economy, net neutrality. Tell stories to
engage the imagination and make issues personal. Such stories are sometimes known as
“anecdata.” Encourage people to imagine the better future we can effect by getting politically
active and actually voting.

Know what goes on with candidates. During the 2016 election, Democrats did not target black
voters in red states, and that bit them in the arse. To return Democrats to their Progressive
roots, get involved in the party. We need the totality of the Progressive base.

Go to trusted sources and find out what their issues are. Campaign headquarters should hire
local community organizers to their staffs because these people know the area better than the
usual consultant cadre. Democrats need to hire better and more diverse people if they really
want to win. After all, the winners are the ones who make policy.

An example issue is the fight for the ERA. Right now this amendment needs only two more states to pass it. The deadline is not in the law – we still have time to make it part of the Constitution.

The Power of Networking

Look for supporting forces outside of your normal zone. Don’t just sympathize with other
organizations – equalize with them. Food is a great organizer, so host potlucks as activities to
facilitate connection-making and cross-pollination. Have business cards to give out. Listening is
more important than talking – good listeners make great leaders.

High-impact organizations partner with other organizations through collaboration, coalition
building and making partnerships. An effective organization works outside itself for more impact.
Put flexibility in the organization and its message – tailor message to different groups and sorts
of groups. Communicate frequently, offer supportive messages for other organizations, and
cooperate on projects. Share leadership by consulting and learning from each other. Joint
programs can often get government or NGO grants together.

Barriers to coalition building include egos and leaders. Remember that it’s about the CAUSE,
not you. Some non-profits want to hold on to vision of their founder(s), who may actually have
been interested in joining coalitions.

Some coalitions like to have a Memorandum of Understanding. This is a legal document
between organizations, and is not necessary but nice to have. Because it is binding, not all
groups will be willing to sign one.

Civic Engagement with Legislature

You can find your state representatives and senators on-line. Look for town hall meetings and
coffee hours when they are willing to meet with constituents. Do not focus on just state
representatives – include county and city officials, as well as school boards.

Many legislators have Facebook accounts, so you can find them that way; however, beware of
“Fakebook” pages that purport to be from these people but have incorrect information. Doublecheck
with your targeted official what is his/her actual site. Some reps post upcoming events on
their Facebook pages. When you learn of such an event, get the word out so others will attend –
the more, the merrier.

Call and schedule a meeting; be aware that you may meet with staff rather than the actual rep.
Write down your questions ahead of time while thinking about what is your main point. Follow up
after the meeting, and don’t get frustrated by a lack of response. The best way to communicate
is the means you prefer. When writing a response or follow-up note, though, remember that
perfect is the enemy of good enough. Your message doesn’t have to be over-polished in order
for you to make your point.

Look up current bills for your state, city or county to see if any of them pique your interest. Seek
organizations in your state that do this on their websites. Double-check bill numbers, as these
can change.

Organizations are good for getting large numbers of people to respond. A caucus is really just a
club, so it does not have any real power; however, there is strength in numbers, and members
of a caucus are interested in political activism. One activity to get people involved and bring
attention to an issue is a postcard-writing party. Use eye-catching postcards, especially ones
that are specific to a district, city or state – or the specific issue. Don’t use mass e-mails, as they
tend to be ignored.

Testifying at Committee, for or against a bill, is a great way to get your voice heard. Become a
regular observer of such hearings before testifying so you can get a feel for what goes on and
get some ideas about the proper way to present your side. You may be able to watch such
committees on-line. One need not be an expert on the subject matter, just someone with a story
germane to the bill. Remember, ordinary citizens are the strongest lobbying group!

Contact members of the committee the bill is in if you have a story. Find at least one person who
is interested in your cause, and look for true progressives. Work with groups of legislators to
add depth to legislation – this provides a wider venue to share your story. Visit the legislature’s
website and contact reps to learn best way to access legislative info for political entity.
Committee chairs have a lot of power in some states, so research whether this is true for yours.

Find out if you can get alerts by text messages or Twitter so you can jump on an issue quickly.
Learn what your state’s legislative hashtags are. Bills can mutate into something very different
from what they originally were, so be vigilant! Watch out for lame-duck legislation in states that
have term limits.

Red State Organizing

You need to be under the radar by design because you are working in dangerous areas. Don’t
lead with radical ideas – instead, start out with your more moderate positions. For example,
instead of talking about abortion or even birth control, talk about miscarriage management.

Listen to find your place of commonality in communities. Get to know people and keep your
radical isms hidden. Informal gatherings are great for networking. The value of social capital in
rural America is hard to replace. When a local government issues a list of agenda items, find
some that resonate with you and sit with conservatives on those matters. Words that describe a
successful campaign include: sufficient, timely, strategic, compelling, economic, accessible,
inspiring, creative, empowering, inclusive, necessary, fun and sustainable.

Activist Kits are activism made easy and digestible. Have a different theme each month: climate
change, public breast feeding, etc. Get the disaffected registered to vote. Write letters to the
editor. Have a feminine hygiene drive for the homeless. If you can, link a science fair to the
March for Science in order to engage students. Many people are afraid to speak up, but may
feel safer if they know others feel as they do.

Research people you want to connect with via networking. Be careful how you frame yourself to
reach others so you don’t turn off potential allies. People from blue areas can help progressives
in red areas. We need to stop the trickle of bad ideas, so we must NEVER get complacent.

We have to start talking to others. There is always place of commonality, so find it and stay
there. It is more important to be heard than to be right. Social change takes a long time – as the
old saw goes, it’s a marathon, not a sprint, so dig in and be patient. Start with humor if you can,
and never lead with any heavy stuff. Don’t have changing someone as the goal, instead aim to
connect. Don’t put yourself in any situation where you feel threatened.

Reach out to people who are not on the top of your traditional ally list. Identify an action in a red
state that may get Progressives to come out of the woodwork. You can get action kits from
ActivateUs. Photograph an appropriate ActivateUs action kit, then send it to five non-active people and ask them to join.

Divest from the War Economy

Currently the US is actively bombing seven countries. 60% of the US budget is for defense; one
estimate says we will spend $2 billion every day on war in 2018. The #1 US export is weapons,
and Saudi Arabia is the #1 importer of American-made weapons, which they are using to kill
civilians in Yemen and Syria. Lockheed Martin supports the Gaza genocide by arming Zionist
extremists. A lot of so-called foreign aid doesn’t really help countries devastated by war or
disaster. Destabilization from the US causes corruption and facilitates the rise of dictators.

The war economy is a culture of slavery, exploitation, colonialism and territorial dispossession,
with no institutional accountability. The infamous Military Industrial Complex is a legacy of all
this. While defense contractor CEOs get richer and richer, numerous veterans have difficulty
getting access to physical and psychological therapy they desperately need. Thousands of them
are homeless, and on average, 23 veterans commit suicide every day.

Some 30,000 private contractors are doing the work of the military. One dirty trick defense
contractors use is to scatter the production of their weapons over many communities. This
makes more city and county governments beholden to them, and easier for them to sway voters
and legislators to support more defense spending.

So – how do we divest from the killers and transition to a local peace economy? We need to shift
values to cooperation, reciprocity and accountability. We do this with intersectional coalition
building. We regard other people and organizations as accomplices rather than allies. We make
space instead of taking it up. We rebuild the anti-war movement by encouraging universities,
churches and foundations to divest from defense contractors. We push for more spending on
Americore, FEMAcore and Seniorcore. We figure out how to hold Blackwater and their ilk
accountable for their actions. We ask veterans what military service did to them and how it
continues to affect them. Never underestimate the power of testimony and tribunals – remember
that personal stories have more sway than statistics.

Sustainable Publishing: Giving Voice to Women Writers Who Will Make the World a Better Place

Women writers are often overlooked by the major presses, but not by the small ones. One
example is Green Writers Press. M. Jackson and Janisse Ray are among its authors.

Unlike the big houses, small presses collaborate with authors. If you want to write, start local.
Nonfiction can be easier to promote than fiction. The media need to make more noise against
fossil fuels, racism, and other problems we face. We need fact-based media to counter “fake
news” and propaganda.

Editor’s can’t publish what they can’t see, so get your stuff in the pipeline. Put it out there and
keep calling.

The Role of Cities in Protecting Reproductive Freedom

Local action makes tangible progress. The election of Trump has encouraged more anti-choice
violence because antis are emboldened.

Clinics are fighting every day, and need help from communities. Ask clinic personnel what is
most beneficial to them. Talk with police officers, tell them to protect clinics and truly represent
the community. Contact city councils and demand that laws protecting clinics be enforced. Tell
them that anti-choice activists bother both people and businesses in the neighborhood by
disrupting the peace and creating a hostile environment. Psychologists say that the presence of
anti-choice protesters is stressful and harms both care providers and patients. Point out that
there are ordinances against noise outside all medical facilities.

Many phony “clinics” are receiving government funds. Harp on the fact that they provide
inaccurate information, which may harm the health of girls and women. Get wise to the dirty
tricks that faux clinics use, such as hiring retired nurses, to look legitimate.

Support women who have had abortions – assure them that having the procedure is not the end
of the world. In the telling of abortion stories, antis have rhetoric, but defenders of reproductive
freedom have truth. Create a safe space and find your allies in organizations and local
governments. Find, or help create, a council of women health providers.

The state of Colorado and the city of St. Louis give all who ask long-term birth control. Show
how this saves cities and states money by reducing dependence on welfare and food stamps,
and allowing women to work so they can pay taxes instead of having to take from taxpayers.

Building a New Vision for Safety to Overcome Mass Incarceration

Every year this country spends 80 billion dollars on incarceration. Of the 100 million who have
records, half are women. The incarceration rate for women is increasing. Mass incarceration
results in community instability, and depletes resources that communities need for public safety.
If incarceration depletes resources, why is it done? Why are there so many legal barriers to
reintegrating convicts?

The broader the movement against mass incarceration, the more likely it will meet with success.
The law can become a weapon to establish freedom and justice. We need to put public safety
first and reach out to victims of crime. Communities that are most harmed are least helped
because victims have little or no resources or support for their trauma. This undermines public
safety. All should be seen and heard. Ordinary people can make a difference – for example,
California Propositions 47 and 57 came from the voters, not the legislature.

What if prosecutors were concerned with public safety, and cops listened to crime victims? We
need to invest in healing, education, job training and mental health. Our current punitive system
is harmful. We need to counter the traditional “Tough on Crime” rhetoric and show how three-strikes
laws and mandatory minimums do more harm than good.

The majority of prisoners are people of color, but most guards are white and most prisons are in
“white” areas. Inhumane treatment and racism are rampant, but residents nearby don’t know
this. We should gather stories from inmates on the brutality they suffered, and make it clear that
most people are locked up for minor, non-violent offenses.

We need to provide released convicts with the resources they need to recover, including drug
treatment and diversions. Those who have loved ones locked up are less likely to be civically
engaged and more likely to be depressed, so we need to let them know they are not forgotten.
We must address the concerns and needs of all involved in order to mobilize them and find
common ground.

Freya’s Care2 news page is HERE.  After she gets the article up there, I’ll update with a direct link.

Share

Investigate Jill Stein

 Posted by at 12:48 pm  Politics
Dec 192017
 

Some of the outlier sites on the far edge of the left are screaming bloody murder, because the Senate Judiciary Committee is investigating Jill Stein over whether she committed any crimes by assisting Russia install Donald Trump in the White House.  In my opinion, it’s too long in coming, because Stein did as much to help Trump as anyone in Trump’s campaign.  Fortunately I found a source that saves me some work here, because he expressed my view perfectly.

1219TraitorJill

She spent the entire 2016 election inexplicably pushing pro-Russia policies at the expense of the United States. She traveled to Moscow and had dinner with Vladimir Putin and Michael Flynn. She kept insisting that Americans would somehow be worse off with Hillary Clinton than they would be with Donald Trump. If you’ve spent all year waiting for fringe leftist pariah Jill Stein to be investigated as part of the Trump-Russia scandal, that moment has finally arrived.

The Senate Intelligence Committee has asked Jill Stein to turn over all documents relevant to the Trump-Russia scandal, according to a new BuzzFeed report (link). This does not mean that Stein is guilty of being an active participant in the Trump-Russia conspiracy to rig the election. But at the very least she’s a material witness, based on her dinner with Putin and Flynn in December of 2015, and this move by the Senate suggests there may be more to it.

The key question here is why the Trump-Russia investigation is just now targeting Jill Stein. The publicly available evidence, which is eye-popping but circumstantial, has been in plain public view all along. This move suggests that it’s focused on something else about Jill Stein and Russia that’s not publicly available. Considering that Flynn just cut a plea deal weeks ago, it’s possible – but not a given – that investigators have learned something new about Stein from Flynn… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <The Palmer Report>

Let me add that she appeared repeatedly on RT, Putin’s propaganda network, and regularly passed on Russian propaganda planted by Russian fake news sites.

I have nothing against the Green Party, and support Greens in elections where their candidacy does not help Republicans.  Nevertheless, Stein should be driven from politics, because she intentionally screwed America in an attempt grow her party.

RESIST THE REPUBICAN REICH!!

And the useful fools that help them!

Share
Dec 192017
 

It sure has been a crazy day!  Windows Update warned me that it was a big one, but I had to get it done, because I can’t be interrupted when I do my online shopping tonight.  It took well over an hour, but at least it installed clean.  Between that and all the other things I have to do, I worked through my morning nap. But I did get a new cat smiley. ‍

Jig Zone Puzzle:

Today’s took me 2:35 (average 5:00).  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Fantasy Football Report:

Here’s the latest from our own fantasy football league, lefty blog friends.

Playoffs:

15Playoffs

Patty Monster eliminated Wendy and plays Vivian in the Semis this weekend.  I squeaked by the Sasquatch by less than two points and play Seth in the Semis.  Wendy plays Squatch this weekend in the game for 5th place.

Short Takes:

From YouTube (Media Matters Channel): Right-wing media call Mueller’s investigation a coup against Trump

Barf Bag Alert!!

 

If this were 1960s, I’d call it Russian Propaganda. OOPS!! That’s what it is! RESIST!!

From Huffington Post: The Senate banking committee rejected President Donald Trump’s choice to lead the Export-Import Bank on Tuesday, voting 10-13 against advancing his nomination to the full Senate.

Scott Garrett, who was a tea-party-aligned Republican congressman from New Jersey until he lost his re-election bid in 2016, has faced intense opposition from the business community ― corporations like General Electric Co. and Boeing ― and many traditional GOP allies, such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers.

That’s because Garrett once wanted to shutter the institution that he now is trying to run, and he consistently voted against reauthorizing it.

No doubt this Bagger is drunk on InsaniTEA and should not be confirmed, but why is the only way to stop one of these guys objection by Banksters and corporate criminals? RESIST!!

From Alternet:

Here are the grounds for investigation. [leading to impeachment]

1. Obstructing justice.

Beginning soon after the inauguration, the president engaged in a course of conduct that sought to obstruct justice in the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s investigations of Lieutenant General Michael Flynn and of his own campaign’s potential involvement with Russian activity in the 2016 election.

2. Violating the Foreign Emoluments Clause and Domestic Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Through his businesses in the United States and abroad, the president receives payments, regulatory approval, and other forms of direct and indirect financial benefits from foreign governments. These violate the Constitution’s Foreign Emoluments Clause, which prohibits federal officials, including the president, from receiving a “present” or “emolument” from any foreign government or official. The president’s businesses also act as a conduit for enrichment from federal and state government coffers. These violate the Domestic Emoluments Clause, which prohibits the president from receiving, beyond his official salary, any emolument from the United States or any state.

3. Conspiring with others to commit crimes against the United States involving the solicitation and intended receipt by his presidential campaign of things of value from a foreign government and other foreign nationals, and to conceal those violations.

In the 2016 election, the senior officials of Trump’s presidential campaign (including his campaign chairman, his son and his son-in-law) met with Russian nationals after an invitation to receive compromising information about his campaign opponent, Hillary Clinton, that they were told would be of great value to the campaign. Federal campaign finance law prohibits a candidate or campaign from soliciting a foreign national (including a foreign government) for a thing of value. In 2017, after this meeting was revealed, President Trump personally dictated a misleading public statement on behalf of his son about the intended purpose of the meeting.

I shared three of eight. Click through for the other five. RESIST!!

Cartoon:

1219Cartoon

Share
Dec 182017
 

It has been sometime since I last posted an Open Thread.  I have wanted to but just could not wrangle enough time to get it done before the issues became old news.  I have been working at this and a second piece all day, kept company by my 3 cats.  I did not even do my feature, “My Universe”, in the interests of my time.  Now I will post this to Care2 and start on TomCat’s offerings.

Short Takes

Washington Post — Shortly after Democrat Doug Jones wrested back one of ­Alabama’s solidly Republican U.S. Senate seats for the first time in more than two decades, President Trump offered an optimistic and forward-looking assessment on Twitter, congratulating Jones on his “hard fought victory.”

But by Wednesday morning, as Trump watched the unflattering portrait of the loss unfold on television, the president grew piqued at the notion that he, somehow, was responsible.

“I won Alabama, and I would have won Alabama again,” Trump said, according to a senior administration official. …

The president himself spread the blame. He faulted his former chief strategist, Stephen K. Bannon, for selling him what one outside adviser described as “a bill of goods” in urging him to support Roy Moore, and he faulted Moore himself for being an abysmal candidate.

In the lead-up to Tuesday night, he had also groused about Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), saying he had been too aggressive in trying to push out Moore.  …

A senior administration official, however, argued that Trump often acts as his own senior strategist and the White House doesn’t necessarily need an official political cranium.

There is the biggest problem — Trump does not listen to advice and consider it thoughtfully — Trump only listens to himself.  The next big problem, he gets lousy advice, whether he takes it from himself or from an adviser.

Open Media — Bell is desperate to censor Canada’s Internet. First they tried through NAFTA.1 Now they’re at it again through the CRTC.

Their radical proposal for website blocking with no court oversight would result in sweeping Internet censorship and put Canada’s robust Net Neutrality rules at risk.2

Shaw has come out in support of the proposal.3 But Telus and Rogers are still on the fence.4 If we can get them to come out against this proposal we can split Big Telecom on the issue, and significantly weaken Bell’s position.

Tell Telus and Rogers to oppose Bell’s censorship plan and stand up for Net Neutrality.

Canada, like the US, is fighting against telecoms which are threatening net neutrality.  Click HERE to bring up the letter to Telus and Rogers, 2 of the big 4 telecoms in Canada who have not yet expressed support for Bell’s position.  If you can help us with your signature, that is great!  Thanks

Newsweek  — The 25th Amendment to the Constitution may define the conditions for suspending a president’s authority, but it does not constrain the reasoning behind it.

As written, the amendment states that if a president “is unable to discharge the powers and duties of the office,” the vice president and a majority of the Cabinet can suspend him. Historically, such an inability was attributable to illness or medical problems, but, in light of President Donald Trump, I offer we expand our interpretation: Medicine aside, it is clear Trump is unfit to serve, and lawmakers must invoke the 25th Amendment against him.

Fears of physical disability were certainly foremost in bringing about the amendment. Going back to at least the 1890s, when President Grover Cleveland had surgery to remove a cancerous growth on his jaw, the country had been in jeopardy of being governed by a chief executive who had lost his physical capacity to lead the nation. In 1919-1920, when a stroke immobilized Woodrow Wilson, and his wife largely ran the executive branch, Americans worried about finding a way to overcome temporary or permanent presidential incapacity.

Franklin Roosevelt’s tenure in the White House added to the sense of urgency about replacing a disabled president. By 1944, it was clear to people around Roosevelt that his health was in decline and that he might not live out a fourth term, which proved to be the case.

Ten years later, in the midst of the Cold War, when Dwight Eisenhower served in the Oval Office and suffered a heart attack that temporarily sidelined him, the need to do something about presidential health became more compelling, or so it seemed to the country’s governing authorities. With Lyndon Johnson in the White House, and questions swirling about his rationality in response to the stalemated war in Vietnam, political leaders from both parties saw the wisdom of passing the 25th Amendment.

Years later, in 1981, after Ronald Reagan had been shot and temporarily incapacitated, and then in 1998, when I revealed John F. Kennedy’s hidden medical problems that surely would have barred him from the presidency in 1961, people were all the more convinced that we could no longer turn a blind eye to a presidential candidate’s or a sitting president’s ability to conduct the affairs of state.

In all this, however, nothing was explicitly said about questions of personal temperament to acquit one’s presidential duties. There were glimmerings of this concern not only with LBJ but even more so with Richard Nixon during the Watergate crisis in 1973-74. Rumors about Nixon’s excessive drinking, as the crisis engulfed him, raised fears that the country was in jeopardy of dangerous presidential actions. The country had to wait until Nixon’s taped conversations reached the public 30 years later before it understood the extent to which Nixon’s irrationality had put the nation in peril. In a drunken stupor, he had slept through an unauthorized decision by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and White House chief of staff Al Haig to raise the country’s defense condition (or DEFCON) in response to a Soviet threat to interfere in the Yom Kippur War between Israel and its Arab neighbors.

The rise of Trump to the presidency now brings the question of presidential competence back into focus. Trump’s stumbling performance in his first 11 months represents a new low in the history of the modern presidency. It cannot be chalked up to medical disability, at least not at this juncture, but Trump is vulnerable under the amendment anyway.

We have all said it here at Politics Plus — Trump is unfit to be POTUS.  In my opinion, mental illness is a medical disability, and clearly, Trump has mental health issues that should lead to his ousting under the 25th amendment.  I am not a psychiatrist nor a psychologist, so my opinion does not count. 

NBC News — Matthew Petersen, the judicial nominee who was widely ridiculed last week after a video went viral of him struggling to answer basic legal questions at his Senate confirmation hearing, withdrew from consideration on Monday.

Petersen, a member of the Federal Election Commission, said in his resignation letter to President Donald Trump that it “become clear to me over the last few days that my nomination has become a distraction — and that is not fair to you or your Administration.”

Trump nominated Petersen or a seat on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, which carries a lifetime tenure.

The brightest thing this oaf has done is to withdraw his name from consideration.  One thing that annoys me however is that his announcement is made as a “so I am not a distraction to the work of the administration” rather than the truth . . . “I am not qualified to hold such a position.”  He really looked like an incompetent fool in the interview.

Common Dreams — A United Nations independent expert presented a searing indictment of the wealth gap in the United States, saying that “contrasts between private wealth and public squalor abound” and that the Republican tax plan “is essentially a bid to make the U.S. the world champion of extreme inequality.”

The recent statement by Philip Alston, U.N. Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, follows his two-week visit to Alabama, California, Georgia, Puerto Rico, West Virginia, and Washington D.C.. Based on the fact-finding mission, he said, “The American Dream is rapidly becoming the American Illusion as the U.S. … now has the lowest rate of social mobility of any of the rich countries.”  …

He added: “at the end of the day, particularly in a rich country like the USA, the persistence of extreme poverty is a political choice made by those in power. With political will, it could readily be eliminated.”

Doing so requires “democratic decision-making, full employment policies, social protection for the vulnerable, a fair and effective justice system, gender and racial equality, and respect for human dignity, responsible fiscal policies, and environmental justice.” “Currently,” Alston said, “the United States falls far short on each of these issues.”

So much for American exceptionalism.  Trump campaigned on “Make America Great Again”, but what he and Republicans are doing is stealing the country’s future and its hard fought for reputation built over the decades.  For many of us on the outside looking in, it has been apparent what is happening, and I dare say, we all have our thoughts on this.  For myself, it all comes down to power and greed, power and greed that is systemic in many institutions.

 

Posted to Care2 http://www.care2.com/news/member/775377582/4080848  (open in new window)

Share
Dec 182017
 

Voting Rights in the US are a patchwork of federal and state laws, and nothing more clearly demonstrates this than the laws surrounding the voting rights of felons and ex-felons.  Unfortunately, people of colour are disproportionately affected.

Alabama Democrat Doug Jones was elected to the U.S. Senate on Tuesday by a mere 21,000 votes. That margin would have been much larger if Alabama Secretary of State John Merrill, a strident partisan Republican, would have taken steps to inform his state’s voters than thousands of ex-felons were eligible to vote under a 2017 state law. But Merrill didn’t do that,

6. I’m here to talk about Alabama’s outrageous locking out of people with convictions (disproportionately people of color) from the electoral franchise.

7. Hundreds of thousands of people in Alabama either couldn’t vote yesterday in the #ALSEN election or thought they couldn’t vote bc of AL SOS’s failure to communicate the law.

8. Here’s a long but important timeline. In 1901, #alabama created a criminal disenfranchisement law designed to disenfranchise blacks. They said as much right in the record.

9. They chose to disenfranchise ppl with crimes “involving moral turpitude” b/c that standard was mushy enough to let their friends vote while disenfranchising blacks for violations of the “black code” crimes they made up.

10. In 1985, the Supreme Court struck down the moral turpitude phrase as racially discriminatory because duh. But in 1996, the #AL legislature put the “moral turpitude” standard BACK INTO THE LAW.

11. From 1996 to 2017, there was absolutely NO standard for what convictions were disqualifying. There was no set list of crimes that “involved moral turpitude” and individual registrars county to county decided who got to vote. Many treated ALL felonies as disqualifying.

12. Remember how the standard was chosen in the first place because it could be applied to hurt minorities? (And by the way, Alabama is one of only 12 states that still permanently disenfranchises anyone after their convictions are complete and their time is served.)

13. Americans of all political stripes overwhelmingly support letting people vote after they have completed their sentences (although apparently #RoyMoore does not.)

I encourage everyone to read the article which is a series of tweets by Danielle Lang, an attorney with the Campaign Legal Centre in Washington DC and longer than the 8 points I have highlighted.
This from a Mother Jones article in May 2017:
Fifteen percent of black residents in the state have been kept away from the polls because of their criminal records, according to the Campaign Legal Center, which filed a lawsuit last year arguing the state’s moral turpitude rule was discriminatory. “Felony disenfranchisement laws have the undeniable effect of diminishing the political power of minority communities,said Danielle Lang, an attorney for the center. Indeed, at the time of the state’s constitutional convention, the president of the convention said the rule was intended to “establish white supremacy” in the state. (emphasis added) …

More than 7 percent of the adult African American population couldn’t vote, compared with 1.8 percent of other Americans.

Alabama is one of 12 states that permanently disenfranchises some or all people who have ever been convicted of felonies.

From Wikipedia:

Other than Maine and Vermont, all U.S. states prohibit felons from voting while they are in prison.[41] In Puerto Rico, felons in prison are allowed to vote in elections.

Practices in the United States are in contrast to some European nations, such as Norway. Some nations[42] allow prisoners to vote. Prisoners have been allowed to vote in Canada since 2002.[43]

The United States has a higher proportion of its population in prison than any other Western nation,[44] and more than Russia or China.[45] The dramatic rise in the rate of incarceration in the United States, a 500% increase from the 1970s to the 1990s,[46] has vastly increased the number of people disenfranchised because of the felon provisions. (emphasis added)

According to the Sentencing Project, as of 2010 an estimated 5.9 million Americans are denied the right to vote because of a felony conviction, a number equivalent to 2.5% of the U.S. voting-age population and a sharp increase from the 1.2 million people affected by felony disenfranchisement in 1976.[46] Given the prison populations, the effects have been most disadvantageous for minority and poor communities.[47]

Since Wikipedia mentions Canada, and I am Canadian, I wanted to see just where Canada stands, although I do know that Canadian felons have the right to vote, even when they are incarcerated.  This from The Canadian Encyclopedia:

In challenges to the Canada Elections Act between 1986 and 2002, prison inmates in Manitoba and Ontario met with mixed success in their various Charter challenges to the statutory denial of their right to vote. The question was eventually resolved in the prisoners’ favour in a 5 to 4 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada (Sauvé v. Canada, 2002). As a consequence, all restrictions on prisoners’ voting rights at both the federal and provincial levels were struck down.

Sauvé v Canada refers to the case of Richard Sauvé, a former member of the Satan’s Choice Motorcycle Club incarcerated for life for 1st degree murder.  For those who argue that felons and ex-felons should not be able to vote, some felons get involved in trying to help others in many ways.  Sauvé is one such case in Canada.  Certainly TomCat can shed light on this aspect with his prison volunteer work in Oregon which he has done for years.  He personally knows some felons that are making a difference.  Why should they be denied the right to vote?

This from the Canadian Human Rights Council on the Sauvé challenge:

Some argued that taking away a prisoner’s right to vote was a reasonable violation of the charter given that they were irresponsible, uninformed, and simply undeserving.

Both the Ontario Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada disagreed.

First, they found that the right to vote can’t be limited to just a “decent and responsible citizenry.” Governments had used this restriction to discriminate against citizens on the basis of colour, race, and gender in the past.

Second, the courts ruled that prisoners could not be banned from voting under the pretext that they were isolated from society. With access to cable television and newspapers, prisoners could still stay on top of developments and make informed decisions.

Third, denying the right to vote is a blanket punishment. As such, s.51(e) of the Canada Elections Act was not a “proportional response”; therefore, section 1 of the charter would not allow it to discriminate against prisoners.

Do those arguments sound familiar?  They do to me and I agree with the Ontario Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada.

What’s more, in Canada, the reconviction rate for all the releases in the first year was 44% with the reconviction rate for violence considerably lower (14%). The non-violent reconviction rate was 30% accounting for the majority of reconvictions.  In the UK, the recidivism rate is 50% while it is over 60% in the US.  Investing in rehabilitation including voting rights could help reduce recidivism which can only be good.

Canada does not have a spotless record on voting rights historically, but it has made great strides and continues to look at the impact of all decisions on charter rights closely. 

The US needs to address the inequity in voting rights, not just for felons but for all people that are disenfranchised, nationally.  When Trump  goes to prison for his nefarious actions, do you think he will lose his voting rights?  If others do, then he should also given that his crimes are analogous to treason.

For two countries so close, we are definitely two very different nations.

Posted to Care2 at http://www.care2.com/news/member/775377582/4080845

Share