Trump vs. Comey

 Posted by at 1:38 am  Politics
Jun 112017
 

The lonliest man in the world in a room full of people.

I don't know what people were waiting for most, James Comey's testimony before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, or Trump's reaction to it.  Of course, to get the second, you must have the first.  They are part and parcel.

While James Comey was giving testimony under oath to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on Thursday 08 June 2017, Trump was speaking at the Faith and Freedom Coalition conference in Washington, DC.  According to the Washington Post

"… just as Comey was wrapping up his public hearing, Trump recited Isaiah 1:17, which states: “Learn to do right, seek justice, defend the oppressed. Take up the fatherless, plead the case of the widow.”

Then the president added in his own words: “The entrenched interests and failed bitter voices in Washington will do everything in their power to try and stop us from this righteous cause, to try to stop all of you. They will lie, they will obstruct, they will spread their hatred and their prejudice, but we will not back down from doing what is right.”

“Because as the Bible tells us, we know the truth will prevail,” he added. “Nothing worth doing ever came easy. . . . We know how to fight better than anybody, and we never give up. We are winners, and we are going to fight.”

I am sorry, but when did Drumpf or a pseudo Christian ever heed the true meaning of scripture?  Righteous cause?  Drumpf was playing the audience like a maestro plays the violin, and they bought itlock, stock and barrel.

From The NY Times, these highlights from The Senate hearing:

‘Lies, plain and simple’

Mr. Comey said Mr. Trump lied to the American public when he said that the F.B.I. was in disarray and that agents had lost confidence in Mr. Comey.

“Those were lies, plain and simple,” Mr. Comey said in brief opening remarks.

Mr. Trump made that claim when he fired Mr. Comey last month. Mr. Comey said he was confused and concerned by Mr. Trump’s changing explanation for why he fired him.

‘We know how to fight,’ Trump says

Mr. Trump, appearing at a meeting of faith leaders and politicians in Washington as Mr. Comey testified across town, railed against the media and his political opponents.

“We know how to fight better than anybody and we never, ever give up — we are winners and we are going to fight,” he told hundreds of supporters at the annual Faith and Freedom Coalition’s Road to Majority Conference at the Omni Shoreham Hotel.

Mr. Trump recited Isaiah 1:17, then continued by saying that “entrenched interests” in Washington “will lie, they will obstruct, they will spread their hatred and their prejudice, but we will not back down from doing what is right.”

“We know the truth will prevail,” he added. “Nothing worth doing ever came easy.”

A short time later, Mr. Trump’s personal lawyer, Marc E. Kasowitz, issued a statement denying Mr. Comey’s testimony that the president pressured him to drop his investigations into the Trump campaign’s possible collusion with Russia. He also said Mr. Trump never demanded “I need loyalty, I expect loyalty” as Mr. Comey testified on Thursday.

“Contrary to numerous false press accounts leading up to today’s hearing, Mr. Comey has now finally confirmed publicly what he repeatedly told the president privately: The president was not under investigation as part of any probe into Russian interference,” Mr. Kasowitz’s statement said. “He also admitted that there is no evidence that a single vote changed as a result of any Russian interference.

Mr. Trump watched part of the hearings with the lawyer, and Mr. Kasowitz’s statements tracked closely with emails and talking points issued by the Republican National Committee, who think the former director hurt himself by acknowledging he leaked a memo detailing his private interactions with the president.

Click through for more highlights.  You can also read a transcript of the hearing at  NY TimesIt is decidedly faster than listening to the three plus hours of testimony, although the nuance of tone and body language is lost. 

Rachel Maddow provides some analysis of the day's proceedings.

So, who were the winners and losers after Comey's testimony?

The Hill I have provided the first "winner" and the first "loser".  Click through for the remaining winners and losers.  So Trump, who has the big L on the forehead now?  You do!

WINNERS
 
Former FBI Director James Comey
 
Comey rode into the Thursday hearing on a wave of positive press. He figures to go back to civilian life on the same high.
 
Comey’s seven-page opening statement was praised for its prose and will be remembered for its portrayal of excruciating personal interactions involving a president at war with his FBI director.
 

Comey’s reputation for being “politically savvy” will grow after he revealed that he engineered the appointment of a special counsel to investigate Russia by sharing his notes about conversations with Trump through an intermediary to The New York Times — for the express purpose of getting the counsel picked.
 
There will definitely be some blowback for Comey, who had criticized leaks while serving as FBI director. His admission of sharing the notes underlines his image as a Washington player — and perhaps not in a completely complimentary way.
 
Trump attorney Marc Kasowitz ripped Comey at a presser after the hearing, criticizing the leak as improper and insisting that Trump never asked for his loyalty.
 
Yet the bipartisan praise he won from senators on the Intelligence panel will make it more difficult for critics to tar him.
 
And Comey’s reputation as someone who looked out for an independent FBI is unlikely to be shaken.
 
LOSERS
 
President Trump
 
There was much to be relieved about after Thursday’s hearing if you were Trump or his staff.
 
The legal case against Trump didn’t grow from Comey’s testimony, which included no new bombshells.
 
There is still no evidence that Trump campaign officials colluded with Russia, and Comey would not say that the president sought to obstruct justice by asking him to “lift the cloud” over his administration and the investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn.
 
Comey also said Trump was not under investigation while he was at the FBI, validating public remarks by the president.
 
Still, it’s never a good day when an FBI director accuses you of being a liar and defaming the federal law enforcement power.
 
Overall, it was another bad day in politics for Trump, who has had many of those in recent weeks.
 
The Comey drama and the Russian probe are badly hampering Trump’s ability to govern. The president’s job approval rating hit a new low this week and his agenda has stalled in Congress. 
 
Comey’s testimony will only thicken the “cloud” of controversy that Trump, according to the former FBI director, really wanted to see lifted.
 
Trump's reaction to Comey's testimony the following day as reported by Reuters:

President Donald Trump called James Comey a "leaker" on Friday, the day after his former FBI director accused him in a U.S. Senate hearing of lying and trying to quash an investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. 

"Despite so many false statements and lies, total and complete vindication … and WOW, Comey is a leaker!" Trump tweeted in his first comments since Comey appeared before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday.

If I had to sum up the activities in Washington in ten words or less, I think I'd use a headline from CNN:
James Comey just went nuclear on Donald Trump.
 
I am sure that when TomCat is up to it, he will provide more analysis of Comey's testimony and where he sees this circus going.
Share

  7 Responses to “Trump vs. Comey”

  1. Any one who want's to see Drumpf go down will maintain that Comey's testimony was another nail in Drumpf's coffin, Drumpf followers will remain in denial and hang on to his statements. It is a shame, however that the Washington Post, generally very critical of Drumpf's uttering, was so kind and soothing to him when reporting on Drumpf's rally (because that's what is was) Faith and Freedom Coalition conference. Quoting large sections of his speech, the WP states early in the article " Then the president added in his own words: " followed by a some long sentences that were obviously not his own words but carefully written for him, like those of last year's speech Drumpf gave there.

    Perhaps WP wanted to remain on the safe side of Drumpf, because it was a little disappointed with the results of Comey's testimony, that is the lack of definitive proof of collusion between Drumpf and the Russians, but that was never to be expected from this hearing. What is abundantly clear however is the obstruction of justice that Drumpf committed several times when pushing Comey to let the Flynn investigation go and to publicly announce that he himself was not under investigation and finally for firing Comey as head of the FBI when he didn't comply. As has been said so many times before, for any other president this would have led to the start of an impeachment procedure.

    Sadly, with Republican Congress calling the shots, this isn't likely to happen any time soon and now Drumpf is free to retaliate, smearing Comey's reputation with even more lies and dragging him into court for being a "leaker". Of course this won't happen anytime soon and first Drumpf and his lawyer need to find a court, i.e. judge that is "sympathetic" to Drumpf's cause. If Drumpf and his lawyer do find one however, the verdict of this judge could set justice back decades for all whistle blowers.

    Whatever the outcome of all this, it is evident that America needs to continue:

  2. WRT Mr. Comey's testimony:

    If this is how a "showboating nut-job" performs his duties, then our government would do well to hire as many showboating nut-jobs as possible.

  3. Magnificent job, Squatch.  I could not have done better.  Hugs.

  4. RM: I saw this before, but watched it again. Firing Comey was wrong, and he should have been allowed to continue the FBI's investigation re: Trumpelthinskin with Russian involvement. I would have loved to have been a 'fly' on the wall sitting in the closed session. Personally, I'd believe the Good Humor Ice Cream Man selling ice cream, before I'd believe Donald J. Trump.

    Thank you, Lynn for post.

  5. How anyone who has followed the Trump-Comey story can come to the conclusion that there is no 'there' there is incomprehensible to me.  It seems to me as obvious as it appears to the People's Email Network that Trump is guilty as sin of something, and "obstruction of justice" looks pretty probable.  From the PEN:

    The White House line is that Trump had been "vindicated" because Comey testified he had told Trump that Trump was not under investigation personally. Take careful note of the tense of the verb there, WAS not under investigation.

    Yeah, well, he's sure under investigation now.

    We suppose it all depends on your definition of the word "was."

    And the reason Trump is now a subject of the investigation is precisely because he fired Comey, and because of Trump's outright confession, in at least 2 different ways, the Holt inverview and what he told the Russians in the Oval Office, that it was to stop the Russia investigation.

    So this is not about quibbling about the legal weight of the word "hope," or denying, as did his lying carpetbagger of an attorney from New York City (because no topnotch DC attorney would take the case) that Trump even used the word. Arguing that Comey, about the most truthful person in America, the boy scout poster boy, is a liar, is not a winning case.

    But that's not today's magic insight either.

    Trump claimed that Comey told him three times that he was not under investigation.

    Trump stated to Lester Holt that he asked Comey directly if he was, though Comey testified that on at least one occasion he volunteered that the investigation had not extended, yet, to Trump himself. Comey had discussed with senior staff whether they should unilaterally offer Trump this information, and they agreed to do so.

    Three times.

    Does anybody else find anything curious about that? And then Trump fired Comey anyway.

    As Rachel said, "even if there were no Russia factor," that is a very big deal.

    There are some people who once were Bernie supporters and who consider themselves to be progressive who are now clutching their pearls about, "Oh, oh, Russia, can't we stop talking about Russia, we could make them mad and get into World War Three!"  While I must point out that I don't think the American people have anything against the Russian people, the Russian Government has most certainly targeted our elections (as well of those as other countries,) but I don't, and I don't think anyone here gives a flying you-know about what the Russian Government does, just being Russian, though of course I would want it stopped.  But my biggest concern is what AMERICAN citizens have done to endanger our country, including you and me.  If finding that out and removing traitors from office ends up implicating someone Russian, well, so be it.

    I would also like to point out this article by Nicole Serratore.  It should be read by both men and women – with the caveat that for many women, it may be a trigger.  I have felt the creepiness without being able to put my finger on exactly what was so creepy, but Ms. Serratore makes it very clear indeed.

  6. WP: This must have been inserted by Pence, or some other Pseudo-Christian BS artist!  First, notice the audience to whom this was addressed: the "Faith and…."  These folks will buy anything that feeds into their delusional belief system.  Politicians in general, and Trump in particular, feed their audiences what they already wish to hear.  I am going to guess that at least some of this audience recognized that "Learn to do right, seek justice, defend the oppressed. Take up the fatherless, plead the case of the widow,” is exactly what Trump does not do.  His next line is classic GOPigian "Hey, let's accuse them of just, exactly, what it is we do!"  a form of Orwellian "Double-Speak." 

    NYT: Kasowitz, perhaps the most hard-up-for-a-job lawyer in the country, will parrot whatever he is told to parrot. Trump will always twist truth to his delusional liking.

    The Hill:  Winners. Loosers- Trump may consider himself a winner here, but when has he ever considered himself anything else?  I do not bother to listen to, or read, anything Trump says, or his lawyer, for fear of inducing brain rot in myself.  In the days of Joseph McCarthy, and Nixon, there was a Whittaker Chambers, he of the "Tapes in the pumpkin," bullshit, known to all who knew him pesrsonally, and I once knew one of these folks, as a compulsive liar.  Trump makes him look like an amateur!  It is my opinion that there is much going on behind the scenes that Donny Boy ought to be very afraid about.

     

     

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.