Mar 212012
 

I have been slow to respond to the killing of Trayvon Martin, because I did not want to rush to judgment, before having sufficient evidence to justify an opinion.  In my opinion, the killing was a murder, it was a racially motivated hate crime, and the police tried to cover it up.  Here is a small part of the evidence on which I based these opinions.

21Trayvon…As the world now knows, the 17-year-old Martin walked to a store in Orlando to buy some snacks on the night of February 26. George Zimmerman, a volunteer Neighborhood Watch captain, thought the boy looked suspicious and called 911. The 911 operator told Zimmerman to keep his distance — police would be sent — but there was a confrontation between Zimmerman and Martin. Martin was killed with a single shot to the chest. Florida authorities have not arrested Zimmerman, and federal authorities recently joined the investigation.

The legal question at the heart of the case involves Florida’s so-called "stand your ground" law, which the legislature passed, at the behest of the National Rifle Association, in 2005. Before that time, Florida law resembled that of most other states; during confrontations, individuals had a duty to retreat rather than to respond to provocations. Under the new law, a person is allowed to use deadly force if he is in a place he has a right to be and feels reasonably threatened with serious harm.

In this case, then, the question is whether Zimmerman was in such a place and felt reasonably threatened. The 911 operator told Zimmerman to keep his distance from Martin, but Zimmerman had a right to be on the street. That’s where neighborhood watch volunteers work… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <CNN>

This account by CNN appears biased towards Zimmerman, as even the Florida law does not justify his acts, because there was no provocation from Martin.  In fact the evidence is clear that the provocation came from Zimmerman only.

A pinned, unarmed victim, screaming for help is hardly provocative.

Overall the best coverage I have seen came from Lawrence O’Donnell who covered it in two segments.  In the first segment he discusses the racist overtones of this crime with Corrine Brown and Jasmine Rand.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

I agree with Lawrence. When I first heard the tape I thought the word Zimmerman used was "coon". However there are apparently two different tapes of the same conversation, one of which omits the section containing the racial slur.  Though I cannot say for certain, it think it far more likely that the police doctored that tape, because it’s far more difficult to fake such an insertion than it is to remove a portion of the tape.

In the second, he discusses the "Stand your ground" law with Arthur Hayhoe, Jasmine Rand and Karen Finney.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

While I also consider this a bad law,  I don’t think it justifies the shooting, as I stated earlier. The evidence of overwhelming that Zimmerman was the aggressor throughout.  Reviewing his other 911 calls to police make it clear that, anytime he saw a black person in the community, he assumed criminal intent.  That the same officer previously covered up a hate crime, makes it more likely that he did so here as well.

Although I cannot say that Zimmerman even was a Republican, I have often said that the violent rhetoric employed by Republican politicians and pundits has made such crimes more prevalent, and the party’s pandering to racism certainly added fuel to this fire as well.

There literally hundreds of petitions circulating.  You know what to do.

Share

  40 Responses to “Trayvon Martin: 2nd Amendment Solution?”

  1. One thing I just read is that the Florida lawmakers (jerkwads with oranges) have come out to say the Stand Your Ground did NOT apply here and that Zimmerman should be arrested for murder. I had to read it twice to make sure that’s what they said.

    A second, egregious, item I saw is that Glen Beck’s website implied the boy must have been an arsonist, rapist, or murderer since he’d been suspended from school (he was tardy). Lonesome Roads Beck continues his jerkwadist ways.

    A question, considering the lily-whiteness of Florida gated communities: How the hell did Zimmerman get in?

     

    • Marva, that’s a very interesting question.

      • Tomcat, I guess it’s just as good of a question as how did the Black “neighbors” who say Zimmerman isn’t a racist got in to the “lily-white” community? Wait a sec, isn’t “lily-white” a derogatory term? Oh no, I forgot, hatefulness against White people isn’t per say racism, right?

        • Scott, my father was one of the most extreme racists I have known, most black people who knew him would have said that he was not one.

          There are two kinds off prejudice: institutionalized and individual.  The former is almost toward minorities, but the latter and be toward anyone.  You’re accusing me of things I have never expressed and do not believe.  I have usually heard the term “lily white” from white people referring to themselves.

           

    • The *gated* community as it has been called is a collection of attached town homes that are both resident owner occupied and also investor owned rentals.   There is a gate house at each entrance but they are not usually manned.  There are no gate devices that stop entry and must be activated from a keypad.  It is essentially an open development that is not at all “lilly white”.   The people who live there are working families who still have jobs that can support housing costs of $1K+ per month.  This is what it looks like.   It is comfortable but it is far from being an enclave of privilege and whiteness.  It is a troubled community with defaults and foreclosures.  Now, someone who manages the renters and the common property insurance is on the line as well as the investors and other owner residents.

      Neighborhood watch organizations are not just loosie-goosie.  They are usually well defined resident and management company organizations that see that the watch “captains” are vetted, supervised and are in communication with other captains in the development.  They usually operate by way of telephone trees  and chain calls.  That may have been in place at The Retreat but it was not in charge of Mr. Zimmerman when he sought to express dominance on his turf.   Mr. Zimmerman was acting in a  rogue vigilance mode.

      Radicals and fringe reactionaries wish to return to vigilante law and deadly force when they have some notion that their  boundaries have been crossed.   That is a dog that is just not going to hunt.

  2. To hear the gun nuts tell it, Zimmerman is a staunch defender of mom, the flag, apple pie and the Second Amendment. It is way past time to start calling the NRA what it really is, a home-grown, terrorist organization. I say this as a military-trained gun owner and former NRA member. These folks won’t be satisfied until we re-institute the Code Duello. Take a moment and consider what opportunities that would open up for someone like Zimmerman.

  3. A pinned, unarmed victim, screaming for help is hardly provocative.”

    Zimmerman had a duty to retreat  and wait for trained Law Enforcement…

  4. You would think a case like this would cause people in Florida to reflect and re-evaluate this dumb lock& load law.  But no, it probably won’t.  I can hear Florida’s rednecks starting their pick ups to head out and buy more bullets.

  5. Here is a petition if anyone would like to sign

     

    Prosecute the killer of our son, 17-year-old Trayvon Martin

    https://www.change.org/petitions/prosecute-the-killer-of-our-son-17-year-old-trayvon-martin

  6. The NRA has been responsible for a hell of a lot more American deaths than Osama was. They are a violent, radical organization of SCUM. And anyone who is a member should be aware that he, or she, helped kill this kid.

  7. There are questions being asked now, but why weren’t many of these questions asked at the time of Trayvon Martin’s murder?  The only conclusion I can come to is that there was a conspiracy of silence and cover-up by the police.  As Lawrence O’Donnell noted, of the police officers that responded, one was with Trayvon while the second stood with Zimmerman.  He did not take the gun away from him, he did not try to ask him any questions.  The authorities took his word for his actions.

    If one says something often enough, people begin to believe it as the truth, whether it is true or not.  With the heated rhetoric of the GOP primaries and caucuses, the wars on women and minorities, certain elements of society are going to believe the inflamatory bull and act upon it.

    There must be justice for this young man, Trayvon Martin.

  8. His killing was definitely a hate crime. The law was established to allow people to protect their homes not as a license to hunt.

  9. This is now how I’ll forever view the map of Florida.
    Not that I think it’ll help in saving it from the TC axe (and that’s fine – it’s your site) – but I’m going to include this anyway:  (And if you’re curious what got axed, you can view it at DemocraticUnderground – it’s the third one down.)  But I am curious as to why lots of other sites can post Op-Ed cartoons with no problem.
    This material may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
    The fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
    • A picture that says more than a thousand words!  Excellent Nameless!

    • Sorry Nameless.  Jimmy Margulies is a member of the Cagle group that specifically forbids use of their work under the fair use doctrine.  There are three possible reasons for other sites.

      They may have paid for the use.

      They may have specific permission from the author.

      They may be breaking the law.

      I have seen more than one blog shut down for copyright violations, and prefer not to follow their example.

  10. There is NO justification for this shooting, asnd Zimmernan is clearly a paranoid racist who can’t follow directions. He SHOULD be arrested and convicted of depriving Mr. Martin of his civil rights, and be barred from ever owning or touching another gun for the rest of his life!

  11. I’m from Florida and I’m proud to admit it. I’m White and I have friends that are many different colors (Black, Hispanic, Oriental etc.), and I know of some Blacks who live in gated communities. So the common assumptions on here that this incident taints the whole state is wrong. This could’ve happened in ANY state.

    As to Zimmerman, who the media is conveniently calling a WHITE HISPANIC (wth is that?) because it pumps the race issue up even more, I’d bet the kid wearing a hood on a warm night, regardless of his color, aroused suspicion because it hides his identity. The kid ran from him? Why? Again, suspicious. I don’t know what Zimmerman said or did, and maybe he was overly aggressive on his approach, but do you know what he did? No, you don’t. Also, did the kid reach for the gun? I don’t know, do you? No, you don’t. Now having said that, I think Zimmerman is a total idiot and was waaaaay wrong in getting physical with the kid, and that alone is reason enough to arrest him. You can’t even TOUCH someone physically if they haven’t committed a crime or assaulted you without being charged with some type of Assault or Battery offense.

    As for Murder? I don’t know enough and neither do any of you. Your hateful comments are based on a LOT of assumptions, and you know what’s said about assumptions. Back off! Wait until the Feds come out with the details of their investigation.

    Last thing I’ll point out is this was a minority vs. minority crime. Zimmerman is Hispanic, not White. So back off on the racism stuff because accusing a Race as a whole of being racist just causes more anger directed back at your Race as a whole, and that’s truly sad.

     

     

     

    • Just a few brief thoughts:
      [1] Zimmerman’s mother is Latino, but his father is white.  In fact the Sanford PD called Zimmerman “white”
      [2] What possible difference does it make if Trayvon was wearing a hoodie or not?  As a resident of Florida, because if I ever visit your state I sure want to avoid the potentially fatal mistake of wearing anything that you would consider “suspicious”, maybe you can be so kind as to provide a link to your state’s “Official Florida Dress Code to Guard Against Being Shot to Death”.
      [3] And on a related regional note, would you be so kind to inform us if Florida officially classifies (1) Skittles and/or (2) Iced Tea as dangerous weapons, since that’s what Trayvon was “armed” with.
      [4] Still dealing with Florida statutes, would you share the part of the State Code that says it’s illegal for a kid to run from a man about twice his size and carrying a gun, because that would make the kid, at least according to you, “suspicious”.
      [5] As for waiting for “the Feds” to issue a report – fine.  But WHY THE HELL did the Sanford PD literally botch the investigation from the very start?  Were they trying to cover up a crime?  Why did it take a national outcry to get “the Feds” involved in the first place?  This is not the first, second or even third time that the Sanford PD has a lot of explaining to do for its brazenly bad investigations of innocent people who have been either sent to the hospital with serious injuries or killed.
      [6] And I do agree with you that we should all avoid using racial epithets.  Maybe if you run into your fellow Floridian, Mr. Zimmerman, you could advise him that he should refrain from calling innocent children of color “fu<k!ng coons”.
    • Scott, at no time did I blame the state of Florida for this incident.  Also I did and do not claim to “know” what chaperoned.  My introduction makes it cleat that this article is an opinion along with the facts on which I based the opinion.  I don’t think you can take race out of the equation for the reasons Nameless explained.

  12. The closest eyewitness account (the man whose lawn the incident occurred on) says Trayvon, 6’2″, had pinned Zimmerman, 5’9″, and was beating his face in.  It was Zimmerman who saw this witness and called out to him for help.  The witness fled inside, locked the door, and called 911.

    Zimmerman, no doubt believing he had just been left to die, reached for his concealed Keltec PF9 and shot Martin once in the chest.  Martin slumped forward, his arms under his body, and Zimmerman got out from under him.  This is the position Martin’s body was found in when police arrived moments later.

    When someone with a 5 inch height advantage and half your age has you pinned and is beating your face in (police report said Zimmerman’s nose was bleeding and so was a gash on the back of his head), and they continue when its obvious they have the upper hand, your assumption has to be that they’re trying to kill you.  You don’t wait to see if you stay conscious.  You’re not thinking “oh, if I can just hold out for 5 more minutes of this, the police will be here”…you’re thinking “this guy’s trying to kill me, what am I gonna do”.

    There’s a reason why these self-defense laws were passed.  Because waiting to see whether or not someone actually wants to kill you will, 99 times out of 100, result in you dying before you find out for sure.  That’s the reason for the “reasonably believe your life is in danger” clause…

    If someone is waving a .38 revolver in your face, cussing up a storm, and threatening to kill you…are you gonna wait a few minutes and see if they’re joking?  Because that’s what the law would have you do in the absence of “stand your ground” laws.

    • A few points in response to your comment:
       
      [A] You have made numerous assertions of facts, but have not once provided any corroboration.  Please be so kind as to provide responsible (NOT some right-wing rag like FreeRepublic, etc.) responsible links documenting your multiple assertions of facts. 
       
      [B] You are DEAD WRONG (no pun intended) when you claim, “If someone is waving a .38 revolver in your face … are you gonna [sic] wait a few minutes and see if they’re joking?  Because that’s what the law would have you do in the absence of ‘stand your ground’ laws.”
       
      One can make a good case that Zimmerman is NOT – repeat, NOT – protected by Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law.  Even state representative Dennis Baxley (R), the statute’s author says Zimmerman is NOT protected by his law:
       
      “There’s nothing in this statute that authorizes you to pursue and confront people, particularly if law enforcement has told you to stay put. I don’t see why this statute is being challenged in this case. That is to prevent you from being attacked by other people.”
       
      Prior to “Stand Your Ground” one could avoid being liable for battery after beating someone up if you were acting in self-defense.  Originally that defense came with the requirement that you backed off from the fight if you could, known as the “duty to retreat”.  (There is an exception to the “duty to retreat” known as the “Castle doctrine” where you are in your own home, – but that doesn’t apply to the murder of Trayvon Martin.)
       
      Then came Baxley’s “Stand Your Ground” statute which says that someone “who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat”.  Florida Statute § 776.013
       
      If the Sanford Police had not been negligent in their botched mishandling of this entire case, at that point Zimmerman should have been arrested for probable cause, he could try to claim self-defense, the prosecution would say he should have retreated and Zimmerman would point to Section 776.013.  And then we’d be on our way in a court of justice.  But instead, through Sanford Police Department’s own negligence and malfeasance, they established themselves as judge, jury and – quite literally – executioner.
       
      As documented above, even the bill’s own author has said that the Florida law does NOT give someone the right to “pursue and confront”
       
      So the two questions then become [1] was Zimmerman “engaged in unlawful activity” at the time of the attack, and [2] did Zimmerman “meet force with force” (i.e., the law does NOT allow one to bring a gun to a Skittles and Iced Tea fight).
       
      [1] So was Zimmerman engaged in unlawful activity?  We know that Trayvon’s girlfriend was talking to him just before the attack, and that Trayvon [1] knew he was being pursued, and [2] Trayvon was trying to get away.
       
      Although you provided no documentation to your claim that Zimmerman was a few inches shorter than Trayvon, we do know that Zimmerman weights a good 100 pounds more than Trayvon.  So if not by the words Zimmerman yelled at Trayvon (which we’ll never know), then certainly by his physical demeanor and his actions Zimmerman created a “well-founded fear” in Trayvon and caused him to feel threatened.  Consequently Zimmerman would be guilty of assault under Florida statute  (Fla. Stat. § 784.011)
       

      Additionally we know from the 911 tapes that Zimmerman [A] admitted to following Trayvon and [B] directly ignored the police’s instructions not to pursue Trayvon.  Florida law makes it a crime if someone “resists, obstructs, or opposes” a law enforcement officer.  (Fla. Stat. § 843.01)  So Zimmerman is guilty of both assault AND resisting an officer – and therefore he was “engag[ing] in unlawful activity” and consequently he would lose the protections of the “Stand Your Ground” statute.

      [2] Moving now to Zimmerman’s second defense of “meeting force with force” – as the law does allow.  For Zimmerman to invoke that defense, it would require that Trayvon to have been the aggressor.  There is nothing – NOTHING – in any eyewitness accounts or 911 tapes that portray Trayvon as the aggressor.  In fact, the evidence is quite the opposite as the law says one cannot be the aggressor when being illegally pursued, as Zimmerman was clearly doing.
       
      So Zimmerman can ONLY avail himself of the “Stand Your Ground” protection if
      [1] He was not guilty of assault (which we saw he clearly was)
      [2] He was not guilty of resisting an officer (which the tapes prove he clearly was)
      [3] Trayvon was the aggressor and initiator throughout the entire series of events (which he clearly was NOT)
       
      You can say, “But we’ll never know if Trayvon might have actually initiated the fight.”  While that is true, we need also remember that the defendant (Zimmerman) bears the burden of proof when invoking an affirmative defense that HE was attacked (as Zimmerman is clearly trying to do).  So if Zimmerman cannot prove that Trayvon acted first, which is what he would have to affirm, then he is no longer protected by the “Stand Your Ground” statute.
       
      We will never know all the facts that led to the murder of Trayvon.  But what we can say is that the Sanford Police Department, both by their actions and inactions with regard to standard police protocols, are directly responsible for negligently mishandling the case and preventing justice to be served for a child who was murdered in cold blood. 
       
      That we can say with NO fear of contradiction.
       
    • Studious, although I have to question that description of yourself, Nameless has done an excellent job of debunking your propaganda,  The bottom line is this.  We all have a right to our own opinions, but you don’t get to make up your own facts out of thin air.  If you actually believe that’s what happened, you are getting your information from liars.

  13. Scott, this is some of the sorriest BS I’ve read on this yet. No, it could NOT happen in “any state,” because you’d go right to jail in a hell of a lot of them for this. And Zimmerman, as we are learning, is a pretty spew-filled guy who shouldn’t have been allowed to carry around a gun. And yet, in Florida, his violent tendencies were no bar to his carrying heat.

    Please….. cut the bullshit. Your diatribe makes you look really bad, and I’m not saying that with any malice.

    • Roger, when I said it could’ve happened in any state, I was referring to the actual shooting incident, not the fact that he wasn’t arrested. I agree that in many states Zimmerman would’ve been arrested immediately while the investigation proceeded. My main point was that people don’t know all of the facts but are acting as if they do. You seem to fit in the category of acting and commenting on assumptions, which ends up making people look like asses more often than not when all is said and done. No malice intended.

      • Scott, I believe that’s what you meant, but your description of the events as “this” could easily be interpreted either way.

  14. OK Tomcat, as you said, everyone is entitled to their opinion. Right now, God help anyone who voices an opinion that’s contrary to the media’s reporting. We all know that they’re always fair & balanced. My main original point was quit crying racism & let the facts come out. Then wait & see if the authorities do what should be done. Mr./Ms. SOINEEDANAME has already arrested, prosecuted, & convicted Zimmerman, & he/she has no damn clue what really happened & neither do I.  Sigh, this story is getting old. I personally suffer from racism & or from Blacks sense of entitlement on a weekly basis. I say that out of courtesy because the alternative is to say I suffer from their ignorance sometimes, & that would be a racist comment. I’ll simplify. I’m a Waiter & 8 out of 10 (80%) leave me a $5.00 to $10.00 tips on $125.00 to $200.00 bills. So, it’s 1 of 3 things. A: Racism because I’m White & they take the chance to screw me or B: Lack of education on how to tip properly, meaning ignorance, or C: They have an attitude of entitlement & simply don’t care what societies standards are when it comes to that situation. Btw, everybody I serve receives A+ “fine dining” service because I don’t know how to do it any other way. Since they tip the same when my Black Waiter friends serve them, I feel it’s option C most of the time. (WHEW!) I shared that so you knew from someone with personal day to day experience can tell that racism does indeed exist today, & it’s a healthy 2 way street. NOW, having said all of that, the reaction of the Blacks & their supporters like SOINEEDANAME in this unfortunate incident is just further proof of their sense of entitlement. I mean the Black Panthers $10,000. reward for Zimmermans capture? Gimme me a break! If I’d posted that reward for Angilo Freeland when he shot Deputy Williams 9 times (wikipedia.org/wiki/Angilo_Freeland), SOMEONE would’ve called it racism. (Btw, Freeman’s parents wanted money AND an apology when the cops caught up with & shot Freeman “too many times”. What a joke!

    So ms INEEDANAME (I’ll give you one if you can’t IMAGINE a better one). Having commented on the Blacks sense of entitlement, I’ll classify you as one of their die hard supporters. You’ve continuously referred to Martins “murder” as if in YOUR MIND, you’re ENTITLED to a conviction of Murder WITHOUT ALL OF THE FACTS REVEALED. Hmmm, is it any wonder that they feel so entitled with people like you out there spewing what you do? Case in point:

    “Although you provided no documentation to your claim that Zimmerman was a few inches shorter than Trayvon, we do know that Zimmerman weights a good 100 pounds more than Trayvon.  So if not by the words Zimmerman yelled at Trayvon (which we’ll never know), then certainly by his physical demeanor and his actions Zimmerman created a “well-founded fear” in Trayvon and caused him to feel threatened.  Consequently Zimmerman would be guilty of assault under Florida statute  (Fla. Stat. § 784.011)”

    You’re quoting statutes? GIVE ME A BREAK! You, nor do the protestors, have ANY proof that a law was broken. YOU’RE A JOKE! And by the way, since when is 7 inches just a few? Oh yeah, when it fits your lam argument. And since Zimmerman made the boy feel scared he’s guilty of Assault? LOL. Keep up the online law degree studies buddy. NOW as for your next spew:

    “Additionally we know from the 911 tapes that Zimmerman [A] admitted to following Trayvon and [B] directly ignored the police’s instructions not to pursue Trayvon.  Florida law makes it a crime if someone “resists, obstructs, or opposes” a law enforcement officer.  (Fla. Stat. § 843.01)  So Zimmerman is guilty of both assault AND resisting an officer – and therefore he was “engag[ing] in unlawful activity” and consequently he would lose the protections of the “Stand Your Ground” statute.”

    Simply put, a 911 operator isn’t a a sworn police officer (DUH!). Now lets finish this.

    “You can say, “But we’ll never know if Trayvon might have actually initiated the fight.”  While that is true, we need also remember that the defendant (Zimmerman) bears the burden of proof when invoking an affirmative defense that HE was attacked (as Zimmerman is clearly trying to do).  So if Zimmerman cannot prove that Trayvon acted first, which is what he would have to affirm, then he is no longer protected by the “Stand Your Ground” statute.
    We will never know all the facts that led to the murder of Trayvon.  But what we can say is that the Sanford Police Department, both by their actions and inactions with regard to standard police protocols, are directly responsible for negligently mishandling the case and preventing justice to be served for a child who was murdered in cold blood.”
    Don’t know if it’s true or not….BECAUSE THE INVESTIGATION HASN’T BEEN FINISHED, but according to you he was murdered. Nothing else is possible, he was MURDERED! Say it often enough & it’ll be believed, right? I read where Martin attacked Zimmerman when he was headed back to his truck. Also read where Martin had Zimmerman on the ground & was beating him. True? I DON’T KNOW BECAUSE THE INVESTIGATION HASN’T BEEN FINISHED! However, this has never been a “Stand your ground” situation, it’s been a question of self defense, or more simply, was it a righteous shooting? But I’ll bet you 2 things. First, the only thing the Sanford Police did wrong was to not be prepared for the outcry their decision would cause. The 2nd thing, knowing first hand how eager Florida cops are to arrest people is that Zimmerman was telling the truth. He acted in self defense. Unfortunately, since the Blacks are ENTITLED to what they want or “deserve”, Zimmerman’s going to get burned somehow.
    No proof he’s a racist. His Black neighbors says he’s not, but of course, what do they know compared to you?
    You know it all, right? And of course you’re ENTITLED to what you want, how you want it, & when you want it.

     

    • Scott, as a former waiter myself, I noticed that people from obviously poor backgrounds usually under-tipped me, while others from obviously well-to-do backgrounds usually did not.  This was consistent regardless of race, although it did appear to be more frequent with black people, because a larger proportion of them grew up in circumstances where they lacked the opportunity to learn the etiquette of gratuities.

      You certainly seem highly emotionally invested in this.  I suggest you read our rules page.  You’re at the borderline.

       

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.