Jan 092011
 

9crosshairs

Sarah Palin has scrubbed the images from her website and her Facebook page targeting Gabriel Giffords and others with the crosshairs of a gun sight.  As I watched in horror yesterday, and as it became apparent that the shooting of eighteen people, the death of six, including a nine year old girl and a Federal Judge, is a direct effect of the Republican litany of hatred and calls for violence, I wondered if Palin and her republican co-conspirators can wash the blood from their hands.  This time they cannot.  I railed against this in December in Second Amendment Solution Gone Bad.  I had done so before in October in Rand’s Republican Brownshirts Strike.  I predicted it way back in March in Potential High for Right Wing Violence.  This has been coming for a long time.  The Republican Party is responsible from Mitch McConnell and John Boehner down.  No McConnell and Boehner were not behind calls for violence, but they refused to object to those within their own leadership that have.  Lets explore this issue in depth.

This is not the first time that Gabby Giffords was targeted by Republicans.  Here she is in an MSNBC interview.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Even though, as a Blue Dog who agrees with Republicans on the issues as often as not,  that did not protect her.  Republican ideologues demand lock-step purity.

Keith Olbermann interviewed Mark Potok of the SPLC, profiling the shooter.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

The Pima County Sheriff made it as clear as he could, without giving away details needed for prosecution that Arizona’s climate of right wing hatred is a factor.

9dupnikWhile not stating a motive for the shootings, Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik in Tucson used a nationally televised press conference to condemn the tone of political discourse in his state. He charged that public debate is now "vitriolic rhetoric," which has rendered Arizona "the mecca for prejudice and bigotry."

Dupnik suggested that such rhetoric can have deadly consequences.

"We need to do some soul searching," Dupnik told reporters. "It’s the vitriolic rhetoric that we hear day in and day out from people in the radio business and some people in the TV business.

"When you look at unbalanced people, how they respond to the vitriol that comes out of certain mouths about tearing down the government, the anger, the hatred, the bigotry that goes on in this county is getting to be outrageous. Unfortunately, Arizona, I think, has become sort of the capital," Dupnik continued.

"We have become the mecca for prejudice and bigotry," Dupnik said… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <CNN>

Talking about tearing down the government, bigotry and prejudice, he was clearly not talking about Democrats.  His references to media people seemed pointed at Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh, and their ilk.  The person most responsible for that climate in Arizona is the RepubliCare Death Angel, Jan Brewer.  One of the things that shocked me most, as I watched the coverage was Brewer’s speech.  She said the right things, but it seemed that she could not keep the occasional twinkle from her eyes and smirking grin from her lips.  She appeared to be pleased at what had happened.  Here’s one frame from that speech that shows what I mean.

9deathangel

Of course the problem goes way beyond Arizona.  There is a love affair between guns, extreme rhetoric and the Republican Party.  Do you remember when Republicans celebrated the Oklahoma City bombing with an ‘open carry’ event outside Washington, publicized on Fox and praised by several Republican House Representatives?  I found two quotes on from Broun and Pratt, the organizers, on Alternet.

9opencarry

Broun:

Broun, a Republican, sees civil war looming on the horizon. "Fellow patriots, we have a lot of domestic enemies of the Constitution, and they’re right down the Mall, in the Congress of the United States — and right down Independence Avenue in the White House that belongs to us," Broun told the crowd. "It’s not about my ability to hunt, which I love to do. It’s not about the ability for me to protect my family and property against criminals, which we have the right to do. But it’s all about us protecting ourselves from a tyrannical government of the United States." [emphasis added]

Pratt:

"I look around: it’s so good to see all these terrorists out here," Pratt said. "Janet Napolitano, she figured, as governor of Arizona, that we didn’t have a border problem, but she knows who the real enemy is. Ha, ha, ha, ha. And Bill Clinton’s been runnin’ cover for her, too. Watch out how you guys speak out there, you know, words can have consequences. Remember Oklahoma City? Yeah, I do. And I also remember the Waco barbecue that your attorney general gave us. Thanks a lot…We’re in a war. The other side knows they’re at war, because they started it. They’re comin’ for our freedom, for our money, for our kids, for our property. They’re comin’ for everything because they’re a bunch of socialists." [emphasis added]

Is it any wonder that crazed minds respond with insane acts?

As much as I’d like to say that calls for violence are limited to Republican politicians, pundits and wing-nuts, it is not.  Sadly such calls have come right on this site, and recently.

    • RealityBites says:
      January 7, 2011 at 7:36 am  
      Time to start shooting repugs on sight. They aren’t human nor American. Mankind doesn’t want them either.
      Parasites should always be stepped on.
      Reply
      • TomCat says:
        January 7, 2011 at 7:54 am  
        I’m sorry, but your call for violence is no less offensive than when Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Michelle Bachmann and Sarah Palin do it. When you adopt Republican tactics, you put yourself down to their level.
        Reply
        • Marx says:
          January 7, 2011 at 10:17 am  
          TomCat I agree with you wanting to keep it classy but RealityBites really has a point. The sad fact is, its just time. Enough is enough. AZ is murdering people, PG&E blew up a whole neighborhood and then charged the people extra for their destruction, Monsanto is destroying the earth, corporate bailouts out of citizens’ pockets etc. etc. ad nauseum. We need to make them fear us and not the other way around. Personally I have too much to live for and will probably just go to Europe, but for people who really want to stand their ground and protect the true US ideology, well you’ve got some dirty work to do and it starts with eliminating those infected fuckholes.
          Reply
          • TomCat says:
            January 8, 2011 at 8:01 am  
            Marx, classy has nothing to do with it. For years I have been railing against Republicans for encouraging their base to commit violent acts against Blacks, Latinos, Gays, Abortionists, Muslims, etc. I have done so because what they are doing is criminally wrong. Wing-nuts from their base have listened and people have died. What kind of hypocrite would I be, if I were to condone calls for violence against Republicans? I’m not saying they don’t deserve it. They do. But if we adopt the kind of tactics they use, we will become no better than they are.
            Reply

The difference is how we respond to them.  I wrote my second reply just a few minutes before the shooting occurred.  Little did I know how timely this would be, and I take pride in the way I handled this.  By comparison, top Republican leadership ducks with the excuse that it’s not their place to interfere with the free speech of their associates, including Sarah Palin, Rand Paul, Michelle Bachmann, Sharon Angle, Adam West, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly, Glen Beck and many more.  The blood of these victims is on their hands.

Although I use strong rhetoric, it a condemnation of violence, never a call for it.  But even I am not completely immune.  A few days ago, I quipped that Blue Dogs should be given jobs circumcising conscious gorillas.  We all need to condemn violence as part of political rhetoric, the subject of Keith Olbermann’s Special Comment.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Finally, please keep the victims of this tragedy and their families in your thoughts and prayers.

Share
Jan 092011
 

I’m up to date with comments.  Other than this abbreviated Open Thread, I have only one piece today, but it’s a big one.  I was up most of the night thinking, researching and soul searching about it.  There are no short takes, as one subject dominates the news.

Jig-Zone Puzzle:

Today it took me 5:23 (average 5:38).  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Cartoon:

Bill Day

It’s a sad day.

Share
Jan 082011
 

8GabrielleGiffordsU.S. Representative Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) was shot in the head outside a grocery store in Tucson while holding a public event.  Giffords was one of the Democrats who voted against Nancy Pelosi for Minority Leader.  The shooter is in custody.  Several of her staff were also shot.  There is no info about the shooter’s identify or motivation.  Please pray (or whatever is appropriate for you) for the people injured and their families.

Share
Jan 082011
 

For me to give high praise to a Republican is a very rare thing, but never let it be said that I won’t give credit fairly when credit is due.  Steven Daglas, an Illinois Republican has listed twenty six different ways that that the RepubliCare Death Angel, Jan Brewer, can fund organ transplants for Arizona Medicaid patients.  She can limit her body count to two victims murdered by her RepubliCare Death Panel.  All she has to do is pick one of Daglas’ twenty six solutions.  But the RepubliCare Death Angel remains silent.

8brewerA few months back a 30-year-old Republican professional from Chicago was reading news articles about cuts to Arizona’s transplant program and wondered if there was a way for him to help.

His name is Steven Daglas and he says that he was particularly struck by the story of Seton Catholic High School assistant basketball coach Tiffany Tate, a 27-year-old with cystic fibrosis who, owing to the cuts, is no longer eligible for a double lung transplant.

“I’ve only been on this Earth three years more than Tiffany,” Daglas told me. “I’ve done some political work in the past and I thought, well, I understand how policy works so I wondered if there were ways to find this money. So I went through thousands of pages of stuff and I came up with these ideas.”

Those thousands of pages included the entire state budget, along with “audits, briefings and financial reports from the Auditor General, JLBC, AHCCCS and others.”

At the end of his research Daglas came up with what he believes to be 26 possible ways to restore funding for the transplants… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Arizona Central Daily>

Kudos to Rep. Daglas.  He saw a great injustice and he put helping those in need ahead of his party.  I fear that they will take vengeance upon him, but hope not.  Keith Olbermann told his story and interviewed him.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

I sincerely thank Daglas for his good work and hope that the Death Angel is shamed into abandoning her quest to murder Arizonans in need of transplants.

Share

Republican Oaths Are Lies

 Posted by at 9:56 am  Politics
Jan 082011
 

I’m now a professional football player.  I found a video of my favorite team scoring a touchdown, stood in front of my screen, raised my right hand, and swore a holy oath to play for my team to the best of my ability.  I figure I can bask in the glory for a while, because the Broncos did not make the playoffs.  Does that sound as ridiculous to you as it does to me?  It’s actually less absurd than Republican attempts to sweep under the rug that two of their experienced legislators did the same thing when they could not tear themselves away from moneygrubbing for corporate cash to take their oaths and violated the Constitution by serving as Representatives without having been sworn in.  Anthony Weiner (D-NY) called them on their BS.

8bogusoathYesterday, Reps. Pete Sessions (R-TX) and Mike Fitzpatrick (R-PA) failed to take the oath of office on the House floor along with the other 433 members of Congress which caused the GOP caucus to scurry, worrying that some of the congressional actions Sessions and Fitzpatrick took yesterday may not have been valid. This morning, the House passed a resolution to fix this problem by a vote of 257-159 — with 27 Democrats voting in favor, three House members voting “present” (including Sessions and Fitzpatrick), and 16 others not voting. The resolution invalidated any votes Sessions and Fitzpatrick had taken yesterday, but also said that “all other actions the members took would count as if the two representatives were sworn in on the floor [Faux Noise delinked].”

After the resolution was introduced, Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) took to the House floor to criticize the new Majority for violating its own newly-instituted parliamentary rules. “A new section was created…that required at least three days notice to consider legislation,” he said, adding, “It is particularly important in this case since we’re dealing with a constitutional issue, one that is without precedent.”

While the presiding speaker said the new GOP rules only apply to bills and joint resolutions, Weiner noted that by failing to take the oath of office and then conducting House business, Sessions and Fitzpatrick violated a provision of the Constitution (which is ironic considering Republicans led a reading of the founding document on the House floor yesterday in a pledge to uphold the document)…

…Watch it:

 

Indeed, Weiner is correct. By failing to properly take the oath of office, Sessions and Fitzpatrick violated Article VI, clause 3 of the Constitution, which states: “The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution.”…[emphasis added]

Inserted from <Think Progress>

The bottom line here is simple enough.  Republicans care for neither their oaths or our Constitution.  They exist to transfer wealth from the poor and middle classes to millionaires, billionaires and criminal corporations and to establish one party rule.  However, I have to admit that watching the Acting Speaker squirm was most entertaining.

Share
Jan 082011
 

I’m up do date with comments, but doubt that I shall visit any blogs today, because of chores that need doing here and the Wildcard Festival of the Church of the Ellipsoid Orb.

Jig Zone Puzzle:

Today it took me 3:47 (average 4:04).  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Short Takes:

From TPM:

Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) literally accused the Republican leadership of the House of being a bunch of big old liars on the floor of the House last night. But that isn’t exactly what he meant.

 

I have never questioned Limpy’s mendacity, and never will.

From Right Wing Watch: I don’t know about you, but when Cindy Jacobs tells me that she has received an "urgent prayer alert from our good friend Chuck Pierce concerning California," my ears perk up … especially when that prayer alert entails God warning that failure by the courts to uphold Proposition 8 will result in California being destroyed by a massive earthquake.

LMAO!! Open-mouthed smile

Cartoon:

Steve Benson

May the Orb bless your team!

Share

Who Cares What the CBO Says?

 Posted by at 10:49 am  Politics
Jan 072011
 

On Wednesday, I posted Republicans Kill the CBO.  Yesterday, Republicans put it into practice by ignoring the CBO estimate on the cost of repealing health care reform.  In the process, they violate their own CUTGO rule.  In addition, Republicans are proving that rules, even their own rules, are something for someone else to follow, but not applicable to them.

gop-liesThe nonpartisan budget scorekeepers in Congress said on Thursday that the Republican plan to repeal President Obama’s health care law would add $230 billion to federal budget deficits over the next decade, intensifying the first legislative fight of the new session and highlighting the challenge Republicans face in pursuing their agenda.

The new House speaker, John A. Boehner, flatly rejected the report, saying it was based largely on chicanery by Democrats.

Mr. Boehner’s dismissal of the report by the Congressional Budget Office, at his first formal news conference as speaker, was the latest salvo in the battle over the health care law. White House officials on Thursday said they were stepping up efforts to defend the law, with a new rapid-response operation to rebut Republican claims and to deploy supporters to talk about the benefits of the law.

But Mr. Boehner’s remarks held wider implications, effectively putting him on a war footing with the independent analysts whose calculations generally guide discussions about the projected cost or savings of any legislation.

“I do not believe that repealing the job-killing health care law will increase the deficit,” he said.

“C.B.O. is entitled to their opinion,” he said, but he said Democrats had manipulated the rules established for determining the cost of a program under the 1974 Budget Act.

“C.B.O. can only provide a score based on the assumptions that are given to them,” Mr. Boehner said. “And if you go back and look at the health care bill and the assumptions that were given to them, you see all of the double-counting that went on.”

But the analysis released by the budget office on Thursday was based on the health care repeal bill that House Republicans introduced on Wednesday. And it highlighted the difficult position that Republicans are in as they try to address what they insist are the top two priorities of voters who elected them in November: cutting the deficit and undoing the health care law.

According to the budget office, those goals are contradictory.

The budget office estimated that the health care law, including education provisions, would reduce deficits over 10 years by $143 billion. Tax increases and cuts in projected Medicare spending would more than offset the cost of extending health insurance to millions of Americans. The budget office projected that the law would result in even bigger savings beyond 2019… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <NY Times>

It’s clear to see that Boehner’s argument is a lie.  Simply put, when facts stand in the way of screwing America on behalf of millionaires, billionaires and criminal corporations, the Republican position is “Damn the facts,  Full speed backward!”

For the rest of the Republican hypocrisy that is coming to light, I turn to Rachel Maddow’s commentary and her interview with Rep. Peter Welch.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

I’m so glad she’s back!

The next two years will require intense vigilance on our part to publicize the ongoing scandal of Republican governance.

Share
Jan 072011
 

The State Department is warning some people that they are at risk due to exposures in WikiLeaks, and even moving some.  But are people really at risk, or is this just a propaganda move to vilify those that have embarrassed people who should be embarrassed over their behavior?  In my opinion, the latter is the truth.

7WikiLeaksThe State Department is warning hundreds of human rights activists, foreign government officials and businesspeople identified in leaked diplomatic cables of potential threats to their safety and has moved a handful of them to safer locations, administration officials said Thursday.

The operation, which involves a team of 30 in Washington and embassies from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe, reflects the administration’s fear that the disclosure of cables obtained by the organization WikiLeaks has damaged American interests by exposing foreigners who supply valuable information to the United States.

Administration officials said they were not aware of anyone who has been attacked or imprisoned as a direct result of information in the 2,700 cables that have been made public to date by WikiLeaks, The New York Times and several other publications, many with some names removed. But they caution that many dissidents are under constant harassment from their governments, so it is difficult to be certain of the cause of actions against them.

The officials declined to discuss details about people contacted by the State Department in recent weeks, saying only that a few were relocated within their home countries and that a few others were moved abroad.

The State Department is mainly concerned about the cables that have yet to be published or posted on Web sites — nearly 99 percent of the archive of 251,287 cables obtained by WikiLeaks… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <NY Times>

When all the bull is stripped away, State is not responding to anything that has happened.  They are reacting to what they fear might happen.  So far, the news organizations distributing the materials released so far have done an excellent job of redacting the names of people at risk, but State could ensure that such people are kept safe by helping the news organizations identify items that really would put individuals at risk and/or really would threaten national security.

Share