You can expect some major howling from Republicans and Blue Dogs over an EPA decision to forbid the largest mountaintop removal mine in WV history. At the same time it is cause for celebration by environmentalists, tired of seeing government look the other way criminal corporations despoil our planet and threaten the health and quality of life of Americans within range.
Yesterday, the Environmental Protection Agency vetoed the largest mountaintop removal mining permit in the history of West Virginia, and one that has been at the heart of these new coalfield wars for a decade.
As usual, Ken Ward of the Charleston Gazette is the go-to guy here:
The move is part of an Obama administration crackdown aimed at reducing the effects of mountaintop removal coal-mining on the environment and on coalfield communities in Appalachian — impacts that scientists are increasingly finding to be pervasive and irreversible…
…EPA officials this morning were alerting West Virginia’s congressional delegation to their action, and undoubtedly preparing for a huge backlash from the mining industry and its friends among coalfield political leaders.
In making its decision to veto the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ approval of the 2,300-acre mine proposed for the Blair area of Logan County, EPA noted that it reviewed more than 50,000 public comments and held a major public hearing in West Virginia. EPA officials said their agency is "acting under the law and using the best science available to protect water quality, wildlife and Appalachian communities who rely on clean waters for drinking, fishing and swimming."
The site is called the Spruce Mine, which became controversial in 1999 when the late federal district judge Chuck Haden, a Republican, issued an injunction that blocked mining there on environmental grounds. Readers with ridiculously sharp memories will recall that I knew Chuck pretty well – he and my father were close friends, and he was one of the eulogists at Dad’s funeral.
What seems to have happened here, according to Ward, is this. After Haden’s ruling, Arch, the operator, scaled the site back by 700 acres (the current 2,300 acres is still about the size of downtown Pittsburgh) and got a new permit from the Army Corps of Engineers in 2007. The Obama administration came in and signaled its intention to review the matter. A full year was spent in negotiation between the EPA and the company trying to find a compromise that would let the mining go ahead but with stronger safeguards, according to Ward. But no deal could be reached.
This is a big big deal, folks. It’s the first time the EPA has ever vetoed a project that was previously granted a permit… [emphasis added]
Inserted from <The Guardian>
Major kudos to the EPA. May this be just the beginning!
5 Responses to “EPA Protects America From Coal Mine”
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Yeah it is kind of problematic years later when the vein taps out to undo all the slurry ponds and fracturing chemicals that leech into the soil and aquifer. But the hardest part is that putting the mountain top back on.
I’ve never seen the after effects firsthand, but I have seen video and pictures. The word “devastation” comes to mind.
Pick any mountain in the Pacific NW and think total deforestation. That would just be a start of the process.
Good on the EPA – When you fly across Virginia and West Virginia, you can see the devastation this mountain top mining causes, not to mention the fallout into the streams and villages below. 😡 😡 Once it’s gone, it’s gone forever.
That it is, Lisa. I just quoted you without knowing it.