Mexico Wins Miss Universe

 Posted by at 1:06 am  Plus
Aug 242010
 

Every once in a while, it’s nice to take our minds off of politics long enough to appreciate beauty.

24Universe

A 22-year-old Mexico woman won the Miss Universe pageant Monday night after donning a flowing red gown and telling an audience it’s important to teach kids family values.

Jimena Navarrete of Guadalajara was first contestant to answer an interview question onstage and the last of 83 standing in the headline-grabbing pageant on the Las Vegas Strip.

"I want to give my parents a big hug," she said at a news conference after the pageant. "There was a lot of effort and a lot of sacrifice."

The train of her single-strap dress floated behind her like a sheet as she walked during the evening gown competition. Before that, she smiled in a violet bikini as she confidently strutted across the stage.

Asked by Olympic gold-medal figure skater Evan Lysacek how she felt about unsupervised Internet use, Navarrete said the Internet is important but parents need to be careful and watch over their kids.

"I do believe that Internet is an indispensable, necessary tool for the present time," she said through an interpreter. "We must be sure to teach them the values that we learned as a family."

First runner-up was Miss Jamaica Yendi Phillipps, while second runner-up was Miss Australia Jesinta Campbell…

Inserted from <AP/Google>

As soon as my tongue peels off my keyboard, I’d like to congratulate Miss Navarrete.  Also, considering that Arizona lies between Las Vegas and Mexico, I hope that she takes the long way home.  Jan Brewer is probably having a hissy fit over this, making Arizona a dangerous place.

Share

Rachel and Keith Hit Home

 Posted by at 1:05 am  Politics
Aug 242010
 

Rachel Maddow and Keith Olbermann release a couple of excellent videos  yesterday.  In the first, Rachel covers how Republicans and their media minions love to scare white people.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

In the second, Keith exposes Obama as a secret Muslim.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

I have to say here that I had done the research for today’s top story hours before I saw this on Countdown yesterday evening.  That Keith and I both turned to satire is either karma or coincidence.  I guess great minds really do fall in the same ditch. 😀

Share
Aug 242010
 

Yesterday I kept up with replying to comments and returning visits.  I expect no trouble continuing that today.

Jig Zone Puzzle:

Today it too me 4:54.  To do it, click here.  How did you do?  It’s a real dawg!! 😉

Short Takes:

From LA Times: A U.S. district judge on Monday blocked the federal government from funding all research involving human embryonic stem cells on the grounds that it violates a 1996 law intended to prevent the destruction of of human embryos.

The judge was a Reagan appointee.  It will be years before the judiciary can be balanced again.

From Washington Post: Former Nebraska Sen. Chuck Hagel (R) will throw his support behind Rep. Joe Sestak’s (D) Senate candidacy tomorrow, the latest in a series of out-of-state surrogates getting behind the Pennsylvania Democrat.

Hagel was one of the last principled conservatives to be driven to the sidelines by the current wave of Republicans without authentic values.

Cartoon: from Cagle.com

24bagley

What’s up?

Share
Aug 232010
 

Midterm elections are known for low turnouts, as if they don’t really matter.  Here in Oregon the right puts its most egregious voter initiatives on the midterms ballots, because fewer independents vote, making their passage more likely.  However, something ugly has happened in recent years that makes these midterms more important than those of previous years.  Most voters don’t even realize it, bit what’s at stake could well be our national identity.

republicanreich There is a clash of civilizations going on, and it has nothing to do with the Burlington Coat Factory Community Center. It’s more fundamental than Christian vs. Muslim. It’s reason vs. fear. Civilization vs. anarchy.

That clash is happening right here in America.

Don’t misunderstand me. I don’t believe that being a conservative equates with being evil. Over the course of our nation’s history, many conservative figures have raised questions deserving of an answer. They framed their issues with ideas that were testable. They contributed to the national conversation in a meaningful, beneficial way. They acted not just out of raw self-interest, but with sincere desire to do what they believed best for our nation and its people.

After more than two centuries of trials both at home and abroad, we have results from those tests. Conservative economics haven’t just brought on repeated failure here, they’ve done the same everywhere and in every time. Conservative social policies aimed at producing a country that’s joined around a less diverse set of ideas haven’t engendered strength through unity, but an inflexible fragility. Those questions have been asked and answered, but the results don’t mean those who raised the conservative position were any less dedicated to discovering the truth and serving the nation.

Only that’s not what’s happening now. Those conservatives, the men and women who argued with reason and passion for the positions they believed best for our nation, have been replaced by something else altogether. The two sides in our national debate can no longer be characterized as simply "left" and "right."  In a remarkably short time, we’ve witnessed the overthrow of the right by something new… only it’s not really new at all.

For a long time I viewed this new crew with something of the same assumption that Jesus made on the cross: "forgive them, because they don’t know what they’re doing." Surely those tearing at the foundations of science would not have done so if they recognized the real danger their actions represented. Surely those calling for defense of the Constitution through limits on the freedoms it enshrines didn’t grasp the contradictory nature of their positions. Surely those working to wrest the last crumbs of control from the powerless and carry them back to the powerful were unaware of years spent and lives lost in obtaining even this modest share of equity.

I no longer believe this is true. When Rush Limbaugh blames the BP disaster on "eco-terrorists," I don’t believe he really thinks this is in any sense factual. When Newt Gingrich compares Muslims to Nazis, I don’t believe he does it out of ignorance. When Glenn Beck says that President Obama will force doctors to perform abortions and Michael Savage says that the president will disband the Marine Corps, it’s not because they are badly informed. When Sen. Pearce insists that the 14th Amendment doesn’t apply to the children of immigrants, when Fox news moves the beginning of Obama’s presidency so that the disasters of the Bush years land on his plate, when those who were so shocked that Godwin’s Law might have been dented in a blog post two years ago are now shouting "Hitler" on the floor of the House and Senate — I don’t think it’s because they’ve been pushed there through no choice of their own. Death panels? Do you think the people making that claim really believed it? What about global warming being caused by sun spots? How about the threat of Muslim terror babies?

The question of protecting the nation or the principles on which it was built is no longer the focus of "conservative" arguments — it’s not even a side note — because this group no longer makes any distinction between the common good and their own self interest. They have reached the conclusion that their success is worth any price, even if that price is fatal to the founding principles of the nation. They have no canon but victory, no concept of restraint.

It’s not surprising that this generation of Republicans has made a hero out of Joeseph McCarthy. They admire the way in which he cowed his enemies and the way in which he distorted the meaning of liberty. They admire him because he generated fear.

The question of "have you no sense of decency" has been answered. They do not — at least not one that rises above their hunger for power.

For the unobservant, what’s happening this November is just another in two centuries of mid-term elections. The press is already dusting off their talks from past cycles, ready to note how the numbers of each party in the House and Senate have been altered. They expect to devote an hour — maybe two — to highlighting what these changes say about the popularity of the president. They may go so far as to discuss how the results affect the fate of some bit of legislation (but don’t count on it). You can bet that have some absolutely spectacular new charts prepared to show poll results and the rearrangement of seats in the legislative chambers.

But the story in this cycle isn’t just numbers. What’s at stake this November isn’t holding Democratic gains in the House and Senate. It’s not protecting Barack Obama’s mojo. It’s not advancing a progressive legislative agenda.

What we’re facing in a few short weeks is a critical test; one that I believe may do more to determine our future than any action inside our own borders for over a century. More important even than the election of Barack Obama in 2008. Because the ideas put forward by men like Glenn Beck are not "just like fascism," they simply are fascism. It’s the idea that personality can outweigh facts, and that force can author "justice" as well as any law. It’s the conviction that those with hard-won knowledge are dangerous, and need to be overruled by "common sense." It’s the view that history has an unfortunate bias, one that can be adjusted with a careful "correction" of the textbooks. It’s the doctrine that only a portion of the populace is Real Americans deserving of liberty, and the rest must be dealt with as enemies. Those poisonous thoughts are sickeningly familiar, and they have lost none of their vile potency in the last sixty years

Those that have taken the place of the traditional Republican Party (and the once reasonable politicians who have thrown over their long held ideals to grovel for these new masters) are not just battling with some aspects of science, they’re waging war on reason. Not just tinkering with immigration policy, but sharply narrowing the meaning of the word "American." What’s at stake isn’t whether laws will be passed favorable to our positions, or whether laws will be passed that we don’t like — the real question is whether the United States will continue as a nation of laws… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Daily Kos>

This author validates what I have been saying for several years now.  I saw the right drifting into fascism during the early years of the Bush/GOP Regime.  Even before 9/11/2001, it was lurking in the position papers from AEI and PNAC, neocon think tanks.  It became more clear as Bush and his Republican cronies trashed individual rights in the name of national security, made scientists research subject to editing by political hacks, instituted the K Street Project to establish one party rule, politicized federal agencies, embarked on aggressive wars to dominate energy supply, resorted to torture, lied to the American people, and the list goes on and on.  Were the Bush/GOP Regime not so incompetent in everything they did, except ravishing the pittances of the poor and the stability of the middle class to benefit the rich, that they turned the people against them, they would have succeeded in establishing one-party rule.

From the above, it would appear that I really hate conservatives, but that is not true.  Right here in Oregon, I voted for Sen. Packwood, a Republican.  I would welcome a return by the Republican Party to principled conservatism.  I just do not see that happening, because the old idea have proved false and they have no new ideas to replace them,

As I see it, unless we wipe the Republican Party off the political map, we risk losing the founding principles of our nation, everything that made us great.  In the 1930, Germany was the most technologically and culturally advanced society in Europe, arguably in the world.  Who would have thought that in just a few short years, through lies and hatred, The Nazi Party could transform that society into the Third Reich.  If we think we are immune, we are fools.

These midterm elections are critical, because it’s is our best chance to nip this new conservatism in the bud, before that destroy our national identity.

Share

Are the Two Parties Alike?

 Posted by at 1:15 am  Politics
Aug 232010
 

I often hear it argued that there is no difference between the Democratic and Republican parties.  I disagree.  Now, I readily admit that the Democratic Party is a vile swamp that needs to be drained.  However, that swamp does have a few flowers, the good qualities that set it apart.  So before we drain that Democratic swamp, we first need to clean out the Republican alligators, whose vicious tendencies make them far more dangerous.  Christine Pelosi offers one critical difference between the two:

23socsec On the 75th birthday of Social Security, the American people got a choice from the two parties: Democrats resolved to protect Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, while Tea Party Republicans urged an end to these vital programs as we know them.

From speeches to rallies from sea to shining sea Democrats seized this moment to celebrate inter-generational compacts that secure our commitment to each other. I believe that Social Security, Medicare & Medicaid are as all-American as motherhood, baseball, and chocolate cake, so it was with pride that I stood this weekend at our Democratic National Committee meeting with my baby in one hand and policy paperwork in the other to argue for a resolution urging the President’s Fiscal Commission on the Deficit to protect Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid Benefits. The DNC resolution, led by retired steelworker and veteran Robert "Big Red" Rankin, placed a marker down on the side of dignity and security for America’s working families by protecting Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. The full text of the DNC resolution is:

  • Resolution Urging the Fiscal Deficit Commission to Protect the Critical Benefits Provided by Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid as They Conduct Their Important Work to Reduce the Deficit
  • WHEREAS, President Obama, by Executive Order in February 2010, created the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform (Commission) and the Executive Order directs the commission to reduce the annual deficits to 3% of the national economy by 2015; and
  • WHEREAS, we fully support the President on the critical need to reduce the nation’s budget deficit; and
  • WHEREAS, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), most of the projected budget deficit over the next ten years results from President Bush’s tax cuts for the very wealthiest Americans and the effects of the worst recession since the Great depression; and
  • WHEREAS, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are three of the most successful federal programs in existence; Social Security has helped generations of Americans retire with dignity, has a $2.5 trillion surplus and has never contributed to the federal deficit; Medicare has helped reduce poverty among seniors by two-thirds since its inception in 1965; and Medicaid provides essential care for millions of Americans;
  • THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Democratic National Committee recommend that the Commission do everything possible to protect the important programs of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

At the same time that Democrats were protecting Social Security, Tea Party Republicans led by Dick Armey were out to privatize it. Indeed, no sooner had I arrived home from the DNC meeting than I tuned in to the Tea Party maven go on MEET THE PRESS where Armey urged Republicans to have the "courage" http://www.politico.com/blogs/politicolive/0810/Armey_GOP_needs_courage.html?showall to co-sign the Paul Ryan Roadmap to privatize Social Security, voucherize Medicare, and block grant Medicaid.

You remember the Ryan Roadmap, right? That’s the top House Budget Committee Republican repeating the same privatization path that was proposed by President Bush and soundly rejected by the American people in 2005. http://www.roadmap.republicans.budget.house.gov/Issues/Issue/?IssueID=8521

You would think after all the complaints about Wall Street recklessness causing Main Street pain that privatizing Social Security would be off the table – but you would be wrong.

So the next time someone asks you about the difference between the parties, just remind them that when Social Security turned 75, Democrats celebrated while Tea Party Republicans grabbed the ax… [emphasis added]

 

Inserted from <Huffington Post>

The only thing Christine Pelosi said, with which I disagree, is that her association of these policies with the Tea Party Republicans.  They predate and supersede Teabuggery.  They are what Republicans want to do.  The reason for privitizing Social Security is to allow Banksters to convert the $2+ trillion trust account go executive bonuses.  The reason for voucherizing  Medicare and block granting Medicaid is to convert what is now going to benefits into insurance industry profits.  Republicans will not rest until they have ripped every last penny from the poor and middle classes to give to the super rich.

That’s one major difference.

Share
Aug 232010
 

Yesterday, I stayed up to date on comments and returning visits.  I should have no trouble continuing to do so today.  Being August, yesterday was was a slow day for news, so there are no short takes today.

Jig Zone Puzzle:

Today it took me 5:57.  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Cartoon: from Cagle.com

23bagley

OGIM!!

Share
Aug 222010
 

More than ever before, the Republican Party has moved to openly endorsing extreme positions and backing up those positions with lies so obvious that the liars have to know that they are lying, and only the most ignorant sheeple, who graze for information only at Fox News, could possibly believe them.  Why would they do this?

gopVision What is it the Republican Party has against religious freedom, private property and the U.S. Constitution?

The question is raised as the GOP scrounges for votes by opposing construction of an Islamic center near the World Trade Center site. In the absence of any credible contributions to critical public-policy issues, the R’s struggle to change the topic.

Republicans are shocked — shocked — that faithful Muslims would try to build on a site they have owned for years, near two other centers that are busy to the point of being overcrowded.

The former retail store is two blocks away from Ground Zero, sacred space indeed, consecrated by the innocent blood spilled by terrorists. This is the site where thousands of firefighters, police and citizen volunteers turned out to search for survivors and recover victims of all faiths and creeds amid the toxic wreckage.

Thousands of those selfless responders are now ill, and Republicans refused to pay for their health care. Evidently they were more appalled by the idea of chasing down offshore tax evaders to pay for the medical relief than by refusing to provide it.

GOP-Recession So it has gone, and so it must be explained as attention turns to the November general election. Where are the Republicans on any substantive public issue? They have had nothing to say, no policies to offer and produced nothing but "no" votes to block Democratic efforts.

Voters worried about jobs, housing and raising families in an economic environment where all the old assumptions are bruised and battered have to ask themselves where the Republican Party wants to lead them.

Sure, let’s just assume President Obama and the Democrats who labored to expand health-care coverage, pass financial reforms and consumer protections, prop up the banking system and staunch job losses got it all wrong. Major legislative achievements, but they got it wrong, OK?

The GOP wanted to do what? One cannot even argue the party had bad ideas and flawed thinking. In the midst of an extraordinary economic crisis Republicans did nothing, content to play parliamentary games and mindlessly vote "no."

RepublicanPlatform Republicans oppose letting the Bush tax cuts lapse. Those tax rollbacks were passed as the party doubled the debt and started two wars. Essentially, they ran up the credit card bill, and cut the monthly payment.

The GOP is totally focused on the federal deficit, except for accepting any responsibility for its size and paying if off. Remember those bygone federal budget surpluses? Read my lips. Presidents Bush, the elder, and Clinton set them in motion with tax revenue.

For pure political hypocrisy on the budget, it is hard to beat the GOP drama queens in state capitols. The Republican governors of South Carolina, Georgia and Nebraska — even the Democratic governor of Tennessee — were never, ever going to accept federal funds to help the unemployed.

Now their hands are out for the money, and they eagerly queued up for more federal dollars to pay teacher salaries. Headlines about their change of heart never matched the bombast about their virtuous refusals.

Republicans are mute on Iraq and Afghanistan, apparently happy to provide Pentagon contractors with more billable hours.

Ever since Republicans grabbed a beer and slid down the emergency ramp, voters must hold Democrats accountable for dealing with federal deficits, ending two wars, and crafting public policy to restore the economy and environment… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Seattle Times>

The author is spot-on.  I can’t believe that the Republican leadership (with several exceptions) is stupid enough to believe their own BS.  Their tactics coalesce as a strategy of desperation.  They have nothing to offer the American people except more of the same flawed policies that left out nation in its most pitiful state since the great depression.  No Millionaire Left Behind is their only success.  So they are desperate to gather votes from anywhere, no mater how hateful and extreme.  And they are are desperate to create non-issues to distract the voting public from asking ourselves if we really want what they have to offer before the November elections.

If voters are so desperate, I can offer the same: No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No

Every Republican in office is one Republican too many!
Share
Aug 222010
 

A few days ago, top Republican foreign policy expert, John Bolton, warned that Israel should attack Iran within eight days, before it was too late.  As is standard, this Republican fear-mongering is a lie.

22reactor The United States sees no “proliferation risk” from Iran’s Russian-built first nuclear power plant at Bushehr that was loaded with fuel Saturday, the State Department said.

The Russian involvement in the reactor, intended for civilian purposes, “underscores that Iran does not need an indigenous enrichment capability if its intentions are purely peaceful,” State Department spokesman Darby Holladay told AFP.

“We recognize that the Bushehr reactor is designed to provide civilian nuclear power and do not view it as a proliferation risk,” he said.

The reactor, said Holladay, is “under IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) safeguards and Russia is providing the needed fuel and taking back the spent nuclear fuel, which would be the principal source of proliferation concerns.”

A White House official stressed, however, that US views on the Bushehr reactor “should not be confused with the world’s fundamental concerns with Iran’s overall nuclear intentions, particularly its pursuit of uranium enrichment.”

After more than three decades of construction delays, engineers on Saturday finally began loading the Russia-supplied atomic fuel in the nuclear power plant in the presence of UN inspectors.

Western nations led by Washington suspect that Iran’s nuclear program masks a weapons drive, a charge strongly denied by Tehran.

Russia’s supply of fuel to Iran is the “model” that Washington and its P5-plus-one partners — permanent UN Security Council members Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States, plus Germany — have endorsed, Holladay said… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Alternet>

Unlike some of my progressive friends, I oppose allowing Iran to develop nuclear weapons.  They are a rogue state with a track record of human rights violations that matches or exceeds our own.  With Israel, Pakistan and India already in violation of the NPT, the last thing this world needs is another state with strong anomosities in their region with the bomb.  However, the point here is that this reactor has nothing to do with Iran’s uranium enrichment program.  Those Republicans. whose lies about this play on public fear, must exposed and shamed.

Share