Sep 022010
 

The Republican right has blamed the left for so called eco-terrorist, who police killed yesterday at the Discovery Channel. While I have no evidence that the man was a Republican, per se, it is clear that his hatred was engendered by Republicans and their media cronies.

GOPRacism3 This afternoon, a gunman entered the Discovery Communications building in Silver Spring, MD and appears to have taken at least one person hostage. Among his various bizarre, eco-related demands, one relates directly to immigration. The alleged hostage-taker, James Jay Lee, calls for the elimination of “anchor baby filth” and “immigration pollution”:

Programs must be developed to find solutions to stopping ALL immigration pollution and the anchor baby filth that follows that. Find solutions to stopping it. Call for people in the world to develop solutions to stop it completely and permanently. Find solutions FOR these countries so they stop sending their breeding populations to the US and the world to seek jobs and therefore breed more unwanted pollution babies. FIND SOLUTIONS FOR THEM TO STOP THEIR HUMAN GROWTH AND THE EXPORTATION OF THAT DISGUSTING FILTH! (The first world is feeding the population growth of the Third World and those human families are going to where the food is! They must stop procreating new humans looking for nonexistant jobs!)

Lee’s immigration screed bears a troubling resemblance to views and policies espoused by anti-immigrant groups such as NumbersUS [Republican Racists delinked], the Center for Immigration Studies [Republican Racists delinked] (CIS), the Federation for American Immigration Reform [Republican Racists delinked] (FAIR), Progressives for Immigration Reform [Lying Republican Racists delinked], and others. Just this past month, FAIR released “The Environmentalist’s Guide to a Sensible Immigration Policy [Republican Racists delinked.”… [emphasis original]

Inserted from <Think Progress>

The pollution that bothered this sick extremist was racial pollution, and the Republicans have a virtual monopoly on racial hatred and bigotry, as they are the nativists, and the fourteenthers.  They are the ones that disenfranchise minority voters.  They are the ones who stress the need for racial profiling.  They are the ones that oppose a path to citizenship for immigrants without documentation.   This terrorist got his ideas from the Republican Party and the Republican Reichsministry of Propaganda, Faux Noise.  But one thing did concern me: the reference to Progressives for Immigration Reform.  I checked them out, and learned that they are just a front group for FAIR, the organization t.hat wrote Arizona’s unconstitutional racial profiling law.  There is nothing progressive about them.

I have repeatedly warned that the ongoing flood of hate speech coming from national Republican leaders and their media minions will result in such incidents.  The Republican Party murdered this poor demented man.  Thank God nobody else was killed.

Share

Military Teabuggery

 Posted by at 2:17 am  Politics
Sep 022010
 

I expect the Republican Brown Shirts, aka the Tea Party,  to come up with their fair share of lunacy and then some, but it baffles me that a three star has joined their ranks.

2mcinerney Retired Air Force Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney has officially joined the legions of birthers, after writing an affidavit in support of Army Lieutenant Colonel Terrence Lakin who refused to deploy to Afghanistan because he does not believe President Barack Obama was born in the United States. Lakin faces a court martial on Oct. 13 for his refusal.

The affidavit from McInerney acknowledges concerns about Obama’s Constitutional eligibility, and demands that he release his birth records or that the court authorize discovery.

In addition, a hearing is set for Thursday at Fort Meade, Md. over a defense request for deposition of Hawaiian officials and written discovery of President Barack Obama’s school and college records… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <TPM>

Now this guy’s name seemed strangely familiar to me, and then, Rachel Maddow, reminded me why.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

That’s right.  When the right wing blogosphere kept claiming they had proof Iraq really did have WMD, this is the fool that started it.  It does not surprise me in the slightest that he’s Fox’s point man on military affairs.  And if Fox tires of him, Jan Brewer would welcome him with open arms.

As much as we tend to treat people like McInerney as a joke, this does raise two serious issues.

First, how did such a miscreant rise to the level of Lieutenant General in the USAF?  As I see it, this is a big red flag.  Republicans have been in charge over at DoD for twenty two out of the past thirty years.  People have made it to the top ranks, like this one and McChrystal, who are not fit to be there.  A major cleanup is needed.

Second, extremists like him have become the face of the Republican Party.  Under a Republican administration, he, or someone just like him, could well be the Secretary of Defense.   Think about it.

Share
Sep 022010
 

Yesterday I fell further behind, because of my volunteer work co-facilitating a therapy group for former prisoners.  Today I plan to reply to comments and return visits.

Jig Zone Puzzle: Today it took me 4:02.  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Fantasy Football:Lefty Bloggers Plus players, the first game is one week from tonight on 9/9.  Don’t forget to set your starters.

Short Takes:

From Vanity Fair: Even as Sarah Palin’s public voice grows louder, she has become increasingly secretive, walling herself off from old friends and associates, and attempting to enforce silence from those around her. Following the former Alaska governor’s road show, the author delves into the surreal new world Palin now inhabits—a place of fear, anger, and illusion, which has swallowed up the engaging, small-town hockey mom and her family—and the sadness she has left in her wake.

The article is worth the read.

From Right Wing Watch: Right-wing radio host Michael Medved in his new Townhall column has discovered how God would vote in the upcoming election, and the answer isn’t surprising. According to Medved, “it’s difficult to escape the conclusion that the Almighty would cast his all-important ballot for Republicans.”

But how can he be so sure of how God would vote in November? Well, Medved argues that progressives’ commitment to social justice cannot have religious sanction because he says that progressivism, unlike conservatism, is inherently discriminatory.

What?  The party of profiling calls US discriminatory?!!?  Scheeesch!!  Anyway, to confirm this, one way or the other, I interviewed God this morning.  She says she’s a progressive Democrat. 😉

From McClatchy DC: The National Weather Service has issued a hurricane warning for much of the North Carolina coast and people are being urged to leave low-lying areas as Earl slowly lumbers north.

You easterners, please take care and stay out of Lisa’s  Earl’s way.

Cartoon: from Cagle.com

2beeler

What are you planning for the Labor Day weekend?

Share
Sep 012010
 

In case you haven’t seen the speech, here it is in its entirety with my commentary following:

When Obama called it “a war to disarm a state”, I disagree.  It was an aggressive, illegal, Republican war for oil and conquest.  It had nothing to do with arms.  That was a lie.  He should have said so.

I fully agree with his praise for out troops.  Their problems came from flawed Republican leadership.

I disagree with him on Afghanistan.  I cannot overly fault him, because I voted for him knowing that he planned to expand that war.  I think he should be flexible, given that the corruption of Republican puppet Karzai, and recognize a lose-lose situation.  At least he confirmed his commitment to start the withdrawal next August.

I agree that the focus needs to shift to the economy and restoring the middle class, but his call for unity is in vain.  If he thinks Republicans will cooperate, perhaps he might want to buy the infrastructure I’m selling in Brooklyn.

But at one thing, I felt outrage:

President Obama hailed his predecessor, George W. Bush, in his remarks on the end of combat operations in Iraq Tuesday night, stating that even though "he and I disagreed about the war from its outset," "no one could doubt President Bush’s support for our troops, or his love of country and commitment to our security."

"As I have said, there were patriots who supported this war, and patriots who opposed it," he said…

Inserted from <CBS>

Bush and his Republican cronies tried to screw our troops at every opportunity and did more to jeopardize our nation’s security than any of his predecessors.  He should have not have lied for Bush’s benefit.

In short, this was not the speech Obama should have given.  That said, I still prefer him over the Republicans

Share
Sep 012010
 

Gallup’s generic ballot poll was a disaster for Democrats.  In itself, that’s important, but to have a chance of turning it around, we need to know who and what has caused this dire situation.

1house The Gallup organization dropped a bomb on the political world this week. In shorthand, the pollsters said Monday that if the midterm elections were held now, Republicans would take control of the House – and probably by a comfortable margin.

On Tuesday, James Campbell, a professor of political science at the University of Buffalo, weighed in with a prediction based on his modeling of the political climate. He said that Republicans are poised to gain 51 or 52 House seats, at least 11 more than needed to depose the Democrats.

Election Day is still two months away, but the twin findings added to the fear among Democrats that their House majority – and possibly their Senate majority as well – is in jeopardy.

For decades, Gallup has asked voters the following question: "If the elections for Congress were being held today, which party’s candidate would you vote for in your congressional district?"

This week’s survey produced the largest lead for the Republicans in the history of asking that question: 51 percent to 41 percent. Ninety-six percent of Republicans said they would vote for the GOP candidate, while 88 percent of Democrats said they would support the Democrat. Independents, who helped power Democratic victories in 2006 and 2008, split 48 percent to 31 percent for Republicans… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Washington Post>

Keith Olbermann and Richard Wolfe discussed this issue:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

For responsibility, let’s start with the Nevada Leg Hound, Harry Reid.  He has been too busy humping Republican legs go do his job.  At the end of the first session, it was clear that the Republican agenda was to obstruct by filibustering every bill.  He could have acted to change the filibuster and secret hold rules at the beginning of the current session.  He failed to act.  Had the Senate passed even half of what the House did and not critically weakened what did pass, we would not be in this situation.  If we are fortunate enough to keep the Senate majority, Harry Reid should be replaced.

Second, responsibility falls on Barack Obama himself.  He promised ‘change we can believe in’.  Then he appointed Geithner, Bernanke, and Summers and other corporate Democrats with few progressives.  One of the reasons I voted for him over Clinton is that I feared that Clinton would appoint those three.  In addition, he has persisted in foolish attempts at bipartisanship, even though it became clear long ago that Republicans will not respond, other than by wanting him dead.  He has been quick to forgive conservative appointees for egregious offences, and equally quick to throw progressives under the bus at the slightest bogus rumor from Fox, the Republican Reichsministry of Propaganda.  He needs to remember who put him in office and deliver on his promises.  His only way to succeed is through his progressive base.

Third, I blame the traditional media.  They have failed to fact-check their reports and given Republican lies equal weight with Democratic truths.

Fourth, the anti-Obama progressives are undermining the party.  That poll is of likely voters, and Keith pointed out that far too many Democrats don’t even plan to vote.  Of those that do plan to vote, I am appalled that 12% of Democrats say a Democrat won’t get their vote.  I’m not telling you not to criticize.  I do, and we should.  But unless we support this party, flawed as it is, we’ll have John “Agent Orange” Boehner as our next speaker.

Share

Poll Results – 9/1/2010

 Posted by at 3:42 am  Blog News
Sep 012010
 

Here are the results of our Republican Campaign Positions poll:

Poll0901

And here are our comments:

From Kevin K. on August 28, 2010 at 3:11 am

 

I would have like to select more than 3 choices, but my picks were the 14th amendment changes, repealing of health care, and the banning of mosques.

Once we go down that road of determining who is a citizen and what is a religion, we might as well throw out the constitution and the protections the founding fathers wrote.

As for repealing health care, once you give the power of health back to special interests, then you can essentially determine who will live and who will die, and in that case, only the rich will survive.

The GOP are attempting their biggest electioneering scheme ever – control the makeup of future generations by disqualifying those they do not like from participating in society…

 

From Cellophane on August 24, 2010 at 9:42 am

 

Like potato chips. You certainly can’t have just one and even three is not enough.

 

From Otis on August 24, 2010 at 5:47 am

 

The problem is the list of ‘biggest problems with Republicans’ is long and deep. You had to pick some, and these are the biggest attention grabbers at the moment.

I think that privatizing education, ‘Bible Study’, and kowing to big business are the worst problems. I also think that it is the base of the R platform. They want you stupid and brainwashed so that you have no idea what they are doing for businesses.

 

From Kathleen Cowan on August 22, 2010 at 9:45 pm

 

Enforcing transparency in political advertisements

 

From TomCat on August 19, 2010 at 3:13 am

 

I missed a very obvoius choice. My bad. Feel free to include ‘Oppose LGBT rights’ as an other. Apologies to our LGBT friends.

Privatize Social Security was the winning Response with Deregulation a close second.  I voted that both and that Privitizing Education are the worst three.

We have a new poll up about Obama’s speech.  Enjoy.

Share
 Comments Off on Poll Results – 9/1/2010
Sep 012010
 

Yesterday, I got tied up in doing volunteer work.  As a result, I replied to our comments, but did not have time to return visits.  I will, but not today.  When I return home from co-facilitating a therapy group for former prisoners, I have my online grocery shopping to do, so I won’t be back to the blog until tomorrow.

Jig Zone Puzzle:

Today it took me 4:35.  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Short Takes:

From CBS: Rick Scott’s narrow victory over Attorney General Bill McCollum, the preferred candidate of the Republican establishment, in the Florida gubernatorial primary could cost the GOP a key governorship in a race that could have implications for years to come.

That’s great news for Democrats.  Scott is such a loon that that they could win this.

From Alternet: The US commander of the Afghan war acknowledged Tuesday that the Taliban were expanding their footprint across the country even as international forces close in on their traditional southern strongholds.

In a word, we’re losing.

From Me:  I just saw that Lisa Murkowski just conceded the Republican nomination for the Senate in AK to Joe Miller.  That’s more ammunition for us.

Cartoon: from Cagle.com

1keefe

Happy hump day!

Share
Aug 312010
 

Republican racists love profiling minorities, and I’m pleased that the Obama administration is holding to their opposition to it, despite Republican fear mongering.  Jan Brewer is going ballistic.

31brewer A US State Department report to the United Nations on human rights contained a reference to Arizona’s recent controversial illegal immigrant law and Arizona Governor Jan Brewer is protesting it.  The State Department listed its opposition to the Arizona law as an example of upholding human rights in the US.

On Friday, Brewer demanded, in a letter [racist delinked] to Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton that the reference to Arizona and it’s new law be removed from the report.  The report is part of a UN review of human rights in which all member nations submit progress reports every four years.

Brewer wrote, “The idea of our own American government submitting the duly enacted laws of a state of the United States to ‘review’ by the United Nations is internationalism run amok and unconstitutional.”… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <The Examiner>

If Brewer does not want to be held up for the international disgrace that she and the Republican party deserve, she should not have violated international law, let alone our own Constitution in her attempt to deprive Latinos of their human rights.  That’s also what Rachel Maddow thinks:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

And I’ll take it one step further.  After Bush let New Orleans drown, the Republican government of Louisiana spent the federal relief money that was supposed to go to the areas hardest hit by Katrina and spent it on tourist areas, on oil companies, and everywhere except the poor parishes of New Orleans where it was needed most.  With their neighborhoods still devastated, black citizens cannot return home, and Republicans have a whiter state.  Jan Brewer and the Republican party did not have the benefit of a disaster to whiten their state, but they are so desperate to keep control of Arizona that they invented an immigration crisis to harass their Latino citizens into leaving.

Share