Yesterday I kept up with comments before going out to the training meeting related to my volunteer work. I returned home about the time I normally wake up to do research, so I’m running on a one hour cat nap and need tooth picks for my eyes. Today will depend on how much sleep I get and how I feel, but I have Saturday set aside for visiting blogs.
Jig Zone Puzzle:
Today it took me 4:51. To do it, click here. How did you do? (Have at me, Jerry. This should be an easy win.)
Short Take:
From San Diego Examiner: The congressional stalemate on the small business lending bill, H. R. 5297, ended today at 3:03 pm. The House approved the amended bill by a vote of 237 to 187.
Only one Republican voted yes.
This the one I said was a sure thing, and at last, after months of Republican obstruction, it can go to Obama for his signature.
Today, the Republicans plan to unveil their latest document that they claim reveals the principles upon which they will govern. I found an advance copy of it here. [PDF] Most of the document is high sounding verbiage that adds nothing, but there are four statements that begin “We pledge…” that contain the significant part. Lets examine them one-by-one.
We pledge to honor the Constitution as constructed by its framers and honor the original intent of those precepts that have been consistently ignored – particularly the Tenth Amendment, which grants that all powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
Republicans have a track record for waving the Constitution about, while ignoring its content. The “original intent” means whatever they want it to mean, and they refuse to be swayed in their interpretation, no matter now much original documentation is available to the contrary. The reference to the Tenth Amendment indicates an intent to undo health care reform, but they ignore the commerce clause.
We pledge to advance policies that promote greater liberty, wider opportunity, a robust defense, and national economic prosperity. We pledge to honor families, traditional marriage, life, and the private and faith-based organizations that form the core of our American values.
Greater liberty, wider opportunity and and national economic prosperity are for the rich and corporations to suck wealth from the poor and middle classes. Are you enjoying the prosperity they brought us during the Bush regime? A robust defense refers to more aggressive wars. The rest means ban all abortions, criminalize the LGBT community, and ignore the establishment clause, that separates church and state.
We pledge to make government more transparent in its actions, careful in its stewardship, and honest in its dealings.
Given that Republican administrations, especially the most recent, have been the most secretive, most wasteful, and most criminal, this is a bold lie indeed.
We pledge to uphold the purpose and promise of a better America, knowing that to whom much is given, much is expected and that the blessings of our liberty buoy the hopes of mankind.
This is empty rhetoric.
What surprises me is that there is no mention of tax cuts for the rich or dismantling the safety net for the rest of us. Those are their biggest goals, as Rachel Maddow demonstrates.
Republicans love to repeat the lie that the Democrats are engaging in class warfare by refusing to extend the Obama Tax Cuts to the richest 2% of Americans. The fact is that Republicans have been so busy engaging in class warfare to redistribute wealth upward that the bottom two quintiles (that’s 40%) of Americans possess only 0.2% (1/5 of 1%) of the nation’s wealth. Here are some examples of the effects.
…The following are 15 shocking poverty statistics that are skyrocketing as the American middle class continues to be slowly wiped out….
#2 According to the Associated Press, experts believe that 2009 saw the largest single year increase in the U.S. poverty rate since the U.S. government began calculating poverty figures back in 1959.
#3 The U.S. poverty rate is now the third worst among the developed nations tracked by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
#4 According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, on a year-over-year basis, household participation in the food stamp program has increased 20.28%.
#5 The number of Americans on food stamps surpassed 41 million for the first time ever in June.
#6 As of June, the number of Americans on food stamps had set a new all-time record for 19 consecutive months.
The above is a snip from an extensive three page article. Clicking through is worth the read.
I have to admit that the above proves that the Republicans have been quite efficient in their implementation of No Millionaire Left Behind. There is no lie the Republicans will not tell in their quest to enrich the rich at our expense. One of their favorites is that excluding the top 2% from Obama’s tax cut will hurt small business. But when they make out that the small businesses hurt are the mom and pop operation on the corner, they lie. They won’t tell you which small businesses will have to pay more, but Keith Olbermann did.
Today is the beginning of several of the provisions of the Affordable Care Act. That’s a good thing for America, but sadly, greedy insurance companies are spoiling the celebration. Here is what’s happening, and what needs to be done.
First the new provisions:
Yesterday, Nancy-Ann DeParle of the Office of Health Reform joined bloggers for a conference call to highlight the provisions of the Affordable Care Act that go into effect tomorrow, six months after enactment of the law. Those changes:
Ban on discriminating against children with preexisting conditions: as of tomorrow, insurance companies can’t deny coverage to children under age 19 for a pre-existing condition. The ban will go into effect for adults in 2014.
Ban on rescission: insurers will be prohibited from dropping a customer when they get sick or to search for errors in customers’ applications to use as a basis for rescinding coverage or denying payment for services.
Ban on limiting coverage, lifetime caps: Insurers will no longer be able to impose lifetime dollar limits on benefits–particularly hospital stays or expensive treatments for chronic diseases, cancer, etc. By 2014, they will phase out annual caps.
Ban on limiting doctor choice in new plans: insurers will have to allow primary care physician status for OB/GYNs and pediatricians so that patients don’t have to get pre-authorization or referrals to see these providers.
Ban on restrictions on emergency services: insurers will have to cover all emergency care, in or out of network.
Guaranteed right to appeal insurer decisions to independent third party in new plans;
Young adults can stay on their parents’ plans til 26 unless they have access to coverage in their workplace;
New plans will cover preventive care with no customer costs–well-baby, mammograms, colonoscopies, etc. will be covered with no co-pays or deductibles.
All of these reforms are good for America, but note that some of the provisions apply to new plans only.
Sadly, greedy pigs that they are, insurance companies have found a loophole in one of the most important provisions.
Major health insurance companies in California and other states have decided to stop selling policies for children rather than comply with a new federal healthcare law that bars them from rejecting youngsters with preexisting medical conditions.
Anthem Blue Cross, Aetna Inc. and others will halt new child-only policies in California, Illinois, Florida, Connecticut and elsewhere as early as Thursday when provisions of the nation’s new healthcare law take effect, including a requirement that insurers cover children under age 19 regardless of their health histories.
The action will apply only to new coverage sought for children and not to existing child-only plans, family policies or insurance provided to youngsters through their parents’ employers. An estimated 80,000 California children currently without insurance and as many as 500,000 nationwide would be affected, according to experts… [emphasis added]
I warned that insurance companies would look for and find loopholes in this law. State legislatures can pass laws requiring insurance companies to honor this provision as a precondition for selling new policies in that state, but Republican legislatures won’t pass it and Republican governors won’t sign it, leaving those children at risk. And that does nothing for the next loophole.
Consider this:
You come home and find a burglar stealing your valuables. You call 9-1-1 and the dispatcher says, “Your police insurance does not cover preexisting conditions, and you have valuables in your home. We can’t help you.” Ridiculous? Aren’t you glad you have universal single-payer police protection?
You come home and find your home starting to burn. You call 9-1-1 and the dispatcher says, “Your firefighter insurance does not cover preexisting conditions. Your home has a wood frame. We can’t help you.” Absurd? Aren’t you glad you have universal single-payer firefighter protection?
Health care is a need as universal and the need for police and firefighters. It is a need far too important to leave to greedy insurance, who care everything about profit and nothing about health. America needs universal single payer health protection.
Yesterday I felt a little better, although not fully up to speed. However, I did reply to all the backlog of comments. Today I expect to do the same. I’m not sure about returning visits, because I’m attending a Department of Corrections training session for volunteers later. That will mess up my sleep schedule big time, so I need to rest as much as I can today.
Jig Zone Puzzle:
Today it took me 4:31. To do it, click here. How did you do?
Short Takes:
From CREW: Today, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a complaint with the Senate Ethics Committee against Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) over his improper use of taxpayer funds to subsidize the personal expenses of staff member Brent Furer and for lying about Mr. Furer’s legislative portfolio.
Furer is the guy Vitter put in charge of women’s issues while he was on probation for savagely beating a woman, I hope they nail Diaper Dave.
From CNN Political Ticker: Vice President Joe Biden travels to Boston Wednesday, where he’s scheduled to team up with Sen. Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas.
A Democratic source tells CNN that the event is a fundraiser for the two-term Democratic senator, who faces a very difficult re-election bid this year.
BOOOO!! HISSSSSS!!! ARGH!!!! Are there no consequences over that damn DINO joining the Republican filibuster against DADT just two days ago?
If we did, we would have ample justification. How many of you remember all the times that Republican Representatives and Senators falsely claimed that Democrats hate the troops, when we held out for such things as demanding an end to Republican torture policy. So even though I don’t think it’s true, I can’t really blame anyone for saying it, just to rub their noses in it. The truth is that Republicans don’t really care about the troops. They love to proclaim support when they want to use our troops as cannon fodder for their aggressive wars of conquest or spend money to transfer wealth from the poor and middle classes to the rich, but that isn’t support. When it comes to making sure they have the equipment they need, giving them raises, giving them health care, increasing veterans’ benefits and caring for their families, Democrats have provided it over Republican opposition. That’s support. Republican obstruction of the Defense Authorization Bill has nothing to do with the troops, except for the gay and Latino ones.
Republicans and two Democrats on Tuesday blocked a defense bill in the Senate that would have paved the way for the repeal of the military’s "don’t ask, don’t tell" policy for gay service members.
The Senate came up three shy of the 60 votes needed to begin debating a $725 billion defense authorization bill that included a provision lifting the ban. Sens. Mark Pryor and Blanche Lincoln, both Arkansas Democrats, voted against the measure, as did Maine Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, both moderate Republicans who the Democratic leadership had hoped would back the bill.
The legislation’s defeat also dashed the hopes of some immigration reform proponents because the bill was to serve as a vehicle for an amendment providing a path to citizenship for children living in the United States illegally… [emphasis added]
First, I think that, if Lincoln and Pryor won’t even support bring this to the floor for debate, our DNC and DSCC money should be invested elsewhere.
Frankly, I think the establishment Republicans hate the idea of depriving military contractors of the rich rewards this budget offers, even for a short time, but they have a problem. The Theocons and InsaniTEA wings, who make up nearly all of the Republican base, hate gay and Latino Americans so very much that the establishment types are afraid to cross to cross them, even though they love corporate greed more than they hate gays and Latinos. They had lots of excuses to explain why. All of them were lies, which Rachel Maddow completely debunked.
If Democrats retain the majority in the Senate, that had better end the filibuster and private hold rules. Believe it that Republicans will, if they get control.
Finally, it’s apparent that the Obama administration made a deal with Senate Republicans, and as usual, the Republicans lied. At this point, Obama should issue a ban on enforcement, pending the report due in December. He could resolve this issue now.
In the best financial news for America since Obama took office, Larry Summers is leaving at the end of the year and has probably been shown the door. Could Obama finally be wising up and learning that having foxes in charge of the chicken coop was a mistake? I certainly hope so, but the proof will be seen in whom Obama appoints to replace him.
Now that Larry Summers is leaving, the President has a decision to make. His choice of a replacement will send a signal about the next two years of economic policy. That signal can restore consumer confidence and reinvigorate the electorate, or it can lead to even more discouragement and despair. Today unnamed Administration officials floated the idea of naming a corporate executive to the position. That’s a trial balloon that should be punctured immediately.
The thirty-year-old law school graduate who asked the President yesterday, "Is the American dream over for me?" might interpret a choice like that as a ‘yes’ — unless he also happens to be a Fortune 500 CEO.
There’s some confusion around today’s news about Summers’ end-of-year departure. Was it a rushed announcement? Did Summers choose to leave, or did he get the axe? Bloomberg News observed that Summers’ departure leaves Tim Geithner as the sole remaining member of Obama’s original economic team, which adds up to something that looks very much like a shakeup…
…Here’s what we do know: For middle-class Americans in search of economic relief, Summers’ departure is hardly what you’d call a setback. According to all reports it was Summers who insisted on introducing a smaller stimulus package, back when Obama had the political clout to get whatever he needed to fix the economy. We’re seeing the results in today’s "jobless recovery." Ezra Klein quotes Stephanie Taylor of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, who said his departure is "a big victory for anyone who voted for change in 2008 only to see Summers work from the inside to water down Wall Street reform, block President Obama’s promise to protect Net Neutrality, and urge other pro-corporate positions."…
…The President could start by considering the economists who were right from the start — about deregulation, about the housing bubble, and about the need for stimulus. And for academic credentials, he could go straight to the top of that group by seeking out a Nobel laureate. Imagine the spike in consumer confidence we’d see if Paul Krugman or Joseph Stiglitz got the nod. (Hey, a guy can dream, can’t he?) Since the Republicans won’t work with the Administration anyway, there’s no downside… [emphasis added]
I agree that a corporate executive is a terrible idea. I’m not saying that they are all criminals, but the only ones with enough experience in the workings of the economy as a whole are the Wall Street banksters, who along with health insurance executives and fossil fuel executives comprise the most criminal class of executives. The post demands an economist.
That said, I agree that an economist who was right would be best, and prefer Stiglitz.
Obama needs to take one more step as well. Dump Timmy too!!
Pick virtually any issue facing America today, and you will find a generous collection of Republican lies on the subject. Some are actually well-crafted lies, difficult to disprove, but some are so totally over the edge that a fifth grader could expose them, like this one, so why do they do it?
Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., delivered one of her signature hard-hitting speeches at the Values Voter Summit, a conference for socially conservative activists on Sept. 17, 2010. At one point, Bachmann took a shot at the woman who leads her chamber, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.
Pelosi, Bachmann said, "has been busy sticking the taxpayer with her $100,000 bar tab for alcohol on the military jets that she’s flying." Bachmann was referring to the Air Force jets that Pelosi uses to fly internationally and back to her home in San Francisco. (Her Republican predecessor, Dennis Hastert of Illinois, used them as well, under a program approved under President George W. Bush.)
Bachman’s claim drew a rapid counterattack from the Speaker’s office, as aides revived arguments they’d used when the allegation first surfaced months earlier. Among other things, Pelosi’s office noted that the Speaker "does not drink alcohol" and that there "is no alcohol service on the domestic flights the Air Force operates for travel from Washington to San Francisco for the Speaker."… [emphasis added]
Of course Batshit Bachmann was busted on her lie, as she has been dozens of times before. So why bother? Two paradigms come into play here.
First, if Republicans told the truth, nobody would vote for them, except for the richest and most hate filled in our culture.
Second, the Republicans know they are lying and know they are not going to get away with it, but these lies distract attention from the real issue in the upcoming elections: Republicans govern only on behalf of the richest 1%. If America realizes that, it’s all over.