On an issue by issue basis, the majority of Americans side with Democrats on most issues.  That makes it puzzling that the majority of so-called likely voters plan to vote Republican.  The key has to be that many, who agree with the Democrats, are either uncertain whether they will vote or planning to cast a throwaway protest vote.  Many are angry with the party, and on some issues, so am I.  But Republicans in power is too high a price for expressing that anger.  If a third party candidate has a viable chance of winning, I can appreciate that, but just handing the seat to a Republican is a decision you would come to regret.

Richard Green wrote excellent article on ten reasons to vote.  Here are the first five:

The party that controls the House of Representatives or the Senate determines the policies and direction of America. When you vote for a candidate on November 2, you are also voting for an entire party. Check the positions you agree with and see which party most reflects your values and then vote accordingly. Each of the 10 Issues reflect actual statements, positions and votes held and taken by the vast majority of Congressmen and Senators in each party over the past two years in The United States Congress.

Which America Do You Want?

I. Jobs

Republicans believe that cutting taxes for large and small businesses and further reducing investment taxes on capital gains and dividends will spur job growth

Democrats want to try to create jobs by limiting the outsourcing of jobs to other countries and by creating and investing in new industries such as clean tech/alternative energy like solar, wind, geothermal, tidal, algae fuels.

II. Gays in The Military

Republicans will keep Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell

Democrats will end Don’t Ask Don’t Tell

III. Oil Spills

Republicans want to keep the $75 million limit on what oil companies have to pay — taxpayers to pay the rest. Senate Republicans have blocked the investigation of BP and the BP oil spill.

Democrats will make oil companies pay for all oil spill damage and want to investigate what went wrong with the BP oil spill.

IV. Climate Change

Republicans oppose climate change legislation because they believe that global warming/climate change is not a significant issue and, even if it is, that it is not man made

Democrats want to limit “greenhouse gases” because they believe that global warming/climate change is a significant issue and is significantly man made

V. The “Bush Tax Cuts” and The National Debt

Republicans will make the Bush Tax Cuts permanent for people making less than $250,000 per year only if the tax cuts for wealthier individuals making over $250,000 is also made permanent. Tax cuts for those who make over $250,000 per year will cost $700 Billion over the next ten years. They want to cut the national debt.

Democrats will make Middle Class tax cuts permanent for people making less than $250,000 per year but do not want to extend tax cuts for those making over $250,000. They want to cut the national debt… [emphasis original]

Inserted from <Huffington Post>

For the other five, please click through to the original.

Rachel Maddow and Eugene Robinson hammer this point home.

So it’s up to you.  Republican rule is the punishment for not voting or for throwing your vote away.

Vote!

The Ninth has selected the three judge panel that will hear the appeal of the Republican racial profiling law, SB1070.  Based on that panel, I am confident that Jan Brewer and the the white supremacists behind the law will be crying in their sauerkraut.

The federal appeals panel that will hear Arizona defend its sweeping law against illegal immigrants Monday consists of two Hispanics, one of them an immigrant, and a Republican appointee who often sides with immigrants in federal disputes.

The judges chosen randomly to hear Arizona’s appeal to the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco are John Noonan, an appointee of Ronald Reagan and a moderate; Richard Paez, a Bill Clinton appointee and the son of Mexican immigrants; and Carlos Bea, an appointee of George W. Bush who was born in Spain and was once ordered deported from the United States. He appealed and won.

"These are three judges who I think are pretty much in the judicial mainstream," said UC Berkeley constitutional law professor Jesse Choper. He predicted that Arizona would have a "relatively steep, uphill battle" because the federal government is given "exclusive power for immigration and naturalization."

The 9th Circuit and even the U.S. Supreme Court would probably be swayed by the federal government’s contention that the Arizona law "improperly interferes with federal foreign policy," he said… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <LA Times>

To be clear, I am not saying that the judges’ background will improperly influence their decision.  There will certainly be much wailing and gnashing of teeth from Republican racists, but the law in this case is obviously clear.  I think that their background will keep them from ignoring the facts, the law, and the Constitution, as SCOTUS did in Citizens United.