Mar 012010
 

Yesterday I did a good job of moderating and applying to comments.  Only someone’s first comment here is moderated.  I also visited my entire blogroll spreading the word.  That’s a big blogroll, so I was moving faster than sound, faster than light, even faster than a Republican can lie.  I have to run errands today but think I can keep up.

Jig Zone Puzzle:

It took me 3:50.  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Short Takes:

Canada won the gold medal in hockey yesterday, beating the US 3-2 in overtime.  Congrats to our Canadian friends.  It was one hell of a game!\

Cartoon:

OGIM!!

Share
 Comments Off on Open Thread – 3/1/2010

Coffee Hit by Global Warming

 Posted by at 2:06 am  Politics
Feb 282010
 

My favorite beverage is about to get mo expensive…

globalwarming-coffee Coffee producers say they are getting hammered by global warming, with higher temperatures forcing growers to move to prized higher ground, putting the cash crop at risk.

"There is already evidence of important changes" said Nestor Osorio, head of the International Coffee Organization (ICO), which represents 77 countries that export or import the beans.

"In the last 25 years the temperature has risen half a degree in coffee producing countries, five times more than in the 25 years before," he said.

Sipped by hundreds of millions of people worldwide, coffee is one of the globe’s most important commodities, and a major mainstay of exports for countries from Brazil to Indonesia.

But producers meeting in Guatemala this week are in a state of panic over the impact of warming on their livelihoods.

While boutique roasters often seek out highland-grown cherries for their subtle tastes, the cooler terroir comes at a premium.

And the new race to the top comes amid already increasing demands for resources between farmers and energy firms.

"Land and water are being fought over by food and energy producers," said Osorio, "we need to make an assessment to guarantee the sustainability of and demand for coffee production."… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Common Dreams>

This is one aspect of global climate change that hits home for me.  I love coffee.  Switching to tea would be thoroughly dissatisfying, and even worse, it could convert me to tea buggery. 😉

It’s bad enough that out coastal cities could become swamps, but we have to save my coffee!

Of course, the opposition to environmental sanity comes from the Republican party.  For, example:

If nothing else, this proves that Republicans do not love coffee as I do.  Their drink of choice is Kool Aid.

Share
Feb 282010
 

The GOP has a problem.  A recent poll of self-identified conservatives places them completely at odds with GOP talking points.

conflictedconservatives …Longtime conservative bugaboos like "foreign aid" and "welfare" score high marks. But other than that, no single proposal reaches even so much as 25% support for cuts among conservatives. And the next highest-scoring answer was something of a surprise: "war on terrorism." Well, I’ll be!

After that, the answers show extraordinarily low, and extremely disparate support for cutting anything else in particular, with no other sector or program even rising to 20% support for cuts. And remember, these are self-identified conservatives.

Foreign aid, of course, comprises only about 1% of the annual federal budget. Defining "welfare programs" for the purposes of assessing how much of the budget is spent on them, presents some problems. Are they all "entitlement programs?" That’d be a sizable budget chunk. But how to reconcile even that with the fact that while something like 35% of conservatives say they want to cut "welfare programs," less than 10% say they’d cut "aid to the poor?" And if "welfare programs" is to include all entitlements, you’re gonna have a problem with the extremely poor support among conservatives for cutting Social Security.

The bottom line is that conservatives — probably like most Americans — say they want at least some spending cut, but can’t cobble together any serious majorities in favor of cutting anything in particular. Even foreign aid comes in below 50%, not that slashing it would help save much money, anyway. And yet, whenever there have to be cuts, the bulk of them by necessity must be those which would be extremely unpopular even among conservatives.

gopVision The only answer to that is probably the only thing even less popular with conservatives than cutting these programs, and that’s taxes. And again, taxes are unpopular with pretty much anyone who has to pay them, though it’s also generally said to be the case that the more liberal end of the spectrum is more open to their necessity than the other side. (We’ll have to see if any data is ever produced that will one day call that assumption into question.)

But in lieu of actual answers, what you get from the discordant mewling of loudmouth teabaggers and other conservative screechers is: a collection of complaints about which they cannot even come to a consensus regarding the measure of their suckitude. "Cut… stuff!" is what you’d get if you had to synthesize a message from this mess. Which is not unlike what you’re you actually seeing saw from them today on Thursday, now that they’ve been invited to a summit meeting to share their ideas for health care reform.

Is this truly a party with a coherent philosophy, supposedly poised to wrest back control of the government? It’s often said that Republicans are far better at stating their basic beliefs than Democrats, and they usually do it by making reference to smaller government, lower spending and lower taxes. But the only consensus they’re able to produce for that even among themselves is for lower taxes. Which is kind of how we got where we are with the budget in the first place. And which leaves Republicans in truth as the party that stands for the explosion of the budget, which comes as no surprise to anyone who’s capable of remembering that Bill Clinton left office with a budget surplus, wrung out of slaying the Reagan deficits.

Again, not unlike what’s what was on display at the summit today the other day. The Republican position on health care, like the Republican position on everything but taxes, is designed only to hold their base together on the fact that they’re angry about something, and want to beat Democrats at the polls in order to prove how angry they really are. What happens after that? Well, who gives a crap? Just cut my taxes… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Daily Kos>

The solution to the dilemma isn’t that difficult to figure out.  If we want to solve Social Security and Medicare shortfalls we can do so today, if we remove the cap and have the rich pay FICA on all their salaries, including obscene bonuses.  The GOP succeeded is skewing wealth so disproportionately that the bottom 40% of Americans own only 0.2% of the wealth.  The GOP has been redistributing wealth for years.  We can tax the rich to return some of that wealth to meet the needs of everyday Americans.  There is on danger that the GOP will beat us to the punch on that one.  They are too much in love with No Millionaire Left Behind.

Share
Feb 282010
 

Yesterday I managed to catch up on replying to comments and returning visits, before I spent the rest of the day working on the website for my nonprofit group and building our new home here.  The intensity of the work had me so pumped that I could not sleep at all last night, so I don’t know if I’ll do better than keeping up with comments today.

Jig Zone Puzzle:

It took me 4:49.  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Short Takes:

Chili suffered an earthquake, measuring 8.8 on the Richter scale yesterday.  At least 214 people were killed.  The Richter scale increases expenentially, so the quake was almost 100 times more powerful that Haiti’s 7.0 quake.

The conservative establishment are trying to distance themselves from their base, the tea baggers, by criticizing the birthers, the truthers and other elements of the wing-nut fringe.  I see this as a positive development, because by doing so, they will alienate the majority of their base and spawn three way races.

Cartoon:

Enjoy your Sunday!

Share
 Comments Off on Open Thread – 2/28/2010

Welcome to Our New Home

 Posted by at 6:56 pm  Blog News
Feb 272010
 

Tom070108-2 Since the majority of you either liked the idea of a move to WordPress, or were at least OK with it, we have moved.

This format gives me a lot more troll control, not that it has been a problem, and offers many new features.  Learning it will take a while.  I’ve transferred over our posts and comments.  I’ll have the blogroll fixed in a few days.  Please update Politics Plus in your blogrolls to https://www.7thstep.org/blog

If any of you have trouble with the blog, feel free to shoot me an email, or better yet, since MadMike offered to help, shoot him one. 😉

We’ll have to start our ClustrMap from scratch, but that’s OK,  They start us from scratch every year and did so at the old site less than ten days ago.  I set our stats at the transfer point.  We’re using the same polling widget.  Of course, I brought Brother along.  So everything should be pretty familiar to you quite soon.

I apologize that your first comments here will be moderated.  Once I have approved one, no more moderation, unless a comment contains more than one link.  I’ll get them approved as quickly as I can.

What do you think?

Share
Feb 272010
 

GOPgo I’ve read several rants blaming Democrats for letting Bunning get away with this, but that’s not fair.  The Republican and Democratic leadership had agrees to pass this measure by unanimous consent, and most of the Senators left for the weekend.  The Democratic leadership had no idea that Bunning planned this, and when he dropped the bomb, there were no longer sixty Senator’s left to override his filibuster.  The net effect is that the GOP derailed several important programs in addition to cutting off unemployment benefits for thousands of workers, displaced by the GOP’s No Millionaire Left Behind program.  They can now lie and say they did not know either, blaming it all on Bunning, who is not seeking reelection.

In the midst of the worst economy in decades, Republican U.S. Senator Jim Bunning last night again took to the floor of the United States Senate to block passage of legislation that would extend unemployment benefits to out-of-work Americans — and his party is doing nothing to stop him.

It’s worth watching his mean-spirited obstructionism — and Harry Reid’s and Dick Durbin’s attempts to cajole him into supporting the legislation — to get a sense of just how committed some Republicans are to doing the wrong thing for America:

Bunning is the poster-child of the most callous, heartless political party in modern American history, and they are proud of it. If they get their way, this coming Sunday, unemployment benefits will expire for countless out-of-work Americans because a handful of extremist ideologues decided to tie the U.S. Senate up in knots… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Daily Kos>

Only a true GOP Sweetheart could be so heartless and so devious.

Share

How Unpatriotic!

 Posted by at 2:30 am  Politics
Feb 272010
 

When I’m wrong, I say so.  Now I’m a staunch Democrat, but that would not excuse blindness.  When my party is wrong, it’s my duty as a patriot to say so.  My party could not be more wrong on this one.

Patriot-Act In the wake of congressional Democrats’ reauthorization and extension of the USA Patriot Act, few elected Democrats have been as vocal about the post-9/11 security measures as they were during the Bush administration.

Leave it to stalwart House progressive Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) to raise a rallying cry against what he called America’s love of its fears.

“This legislation extends three problematic provisions of the PATRIOT Act and, at the same time, leaves some of the most egregious provisions in place, absent any meaningful reform and debate," he declared in a media advisory.

The specific provisions he cited are the Patriot Act’s powers to conduct roving wiretaps, conduct surveillance of people not thought to have any association with terrorism and tap into your personal records, such as library accounts.

The extensions were approved by Congress and sent to President Obama on Thursday, several days before the Patriot Act’s most nefarious portions were set to expire. President Obama had yet to sign the bill at time of this writing.

The Associated Press called the votes a "political victory for Republicans."

Some Senate Democrats did attempt to propose some modifications to the legislation that would have allowed for greater oversight, but they were ignored. Democratic leadership bowed to the wishes of Republicans and conducted a voice vote on Wednesday, upon which the one-year extension was passed. The House voted 315-97 in favor on Thursday.

"Thrown away were restrictions and greater scrutiny on the government’s authority to spy on Americans and seize their records," AP added.

"While I strongly support using the most robust tools possible to go after terrorists, Congress must revise and narrow — not extend — Bush era policies," said Congresswoman Jane Harman (D-CA), according to Reuters.

kucinich Kucinich’s scorn for the legislation was even more pronounced.

"Despite years of documentation evidencing abuse of these provisions during the Bush Administration, the Department of Justice has failed to hold Bush Administration officials accountable for illegal domestic spying by barring any lawsuits to be brought against those officials," he said. "Months into this Administration, The New York Times reported that the National Security Agency had ‘intercepted private e-mail messages and phone calls of Americans in recent months on a scale that went beyond the broad legal limits,’ and that the practice was ‘significant and systematic.’ Passage of this legislation today continues to make Congress complicit in these violations of our basic constitutional rights."

The title of his press release pleaded for congress to "repeal" the Patriot Act and "restore Constitutional rights to Americans."

"As Members of Congress sworn to protect the rights and civil liberties afforded to us by the Constitution, we have a responsibility to exercise our oversight powers fully, and significantly reform the PATRIOT Act, ensuring that the privacy and civil liberties of all Americans are fully protected," he said. "More than eight years after the passage of the PATRIOT Act, we have failed to do so. As National Journal correspondent Shane Harris recently put it, we have witnessed the rise of an ‘American Surveillance State.’ We have come to love our fears more than we love our freedoms."

The USA Patriot Act was passed by Congress in the weeks proceeding the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Many Democrats criticized its passage as too hasty, with some even claiming they did not have a chance to read the hefty legislation before the vote. At the time, the Republican majority did not question it, falling in line to support the legislation seemingly regardless of what the Bush administration put in it… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Raw Story>

I think that Democrats feared giving national security ammunition to the GOP.  I think their rationale is that Obama id far less likely to abuse the power than a GOP President.  I think they are right.  However, if America should ever be cursed with another Republican President, this power will be turned against us with a vengeance.  Given the current makeup of the Extreme Court, the Patriot Act’s unconstitutional provisions would be ignored.  For the Democrats not to repeal those provisions was an act of cowardice.

Share