May 022010
 

Today’s lead piece echoes what I have said long before the Extreme Court insulted our freedom with the Citizens United decision.  It just does so better than I have done.

8words Citizens United v. FEC, the recent Supreme Court decision that allowed corporations to spend unlimited sums of money to influence elections is only the most recent step in this process. There will be more. But the shocking decision may be sufficient to galvanize a political movement that can change the rules and ensure our democracy.

We can save our country by adding eight words to the fundamental law of the land, the US Constitution. "Corporations are not persons." "Money is not speech."

Such a development is not without precedent. Once before a political movement has changed the Constitution to nurture democracy. The populist uprising of the late 20th century led to the passage, in rapid succession of the 16th Amendment in 1913 that allowed for an income tax, the 17th Amendment, ratified the same year that required the direct election of Senators and in 1920 the 19th Amendment that gave women the right to vote.

A campaign to strip corporations of personhood would have a similar populist and popular appeal. A recent Quinnipiac poll reveals a whopping 79 percent public disapproval of the Court’s ruling. A Washington Post-ABC News poll puts the figure even higher at 81 percent. And as Dan Eggen of the Post writes, "The poll reveals relatively little difference of opinion on the issue among Democrats (85 percent opposed to the ruling), Republicans (76 percent) and independents (81 percent)."

But win or lose, a campaign against corporate personhood would allow us to regain control of a narrative we lost in 1980 when Ronald Reagan declared in his Inaugural Address, "government is the problem" and initiated a process that has resulted in the greatest concentration of private wealth and power in American history.

People may not know exactly what Goldman Sachs is, but they know it is not a person. A person doesn’t have unlimited life or limited liability. A person is responsible for her decisions. If she makes a decision that kills or maims people she will go to jail. If a CEO makes such a decision she, at worst, receives a golden parachute.

Unlike a real person, a corporation lacks a conscience. It is guided neither by ethics nor morality but rather by laws that required its Boards to elevate the maximization of profits above all other concerns.

A real person is an independent actor, subject to many influences that affect how he votes. Warren Buffett, for example, thinks it is in his and society’s best interest for him to be required to pay more taxes. A corporation that made this decision could be taken to court by its stockholders.

In his The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Adam Smith’s first, and in his own mind more important work than Wealth of Nations, he outlined his view of the institutions that make men virtuous. He focused on the inherent human qualities of gratitude and sympathy and empathy that lead to a merging of our self-interest with the public good. To Adam Smith, that was the real invisible hand. A corporation lacks sympathy or empathy although occasionally it might express gratitude in the form of increased financial contributions to politicians who do its bidding…

Inserted from <Alternet>

I disagree with this author only on one small point.  Corporate financial contributions to politicians who do their bidding are not expressions of gratitude.  They are investments in the continuation of the current climate of socialism for the rich only that maximize corporate profit at taxpayer expense.

I won’t deceive myself, or you, by imagining such a campaign can succeed anytime soon.  However, there are times when tilting at a windmill is the best strategy, simply because it is the right thing to do.  If would also serve to mobilize independent voters to oppose the GOP’s extreme corporate agenda.

The citation is only the first page of a truly magnificent eight page article.  I strongly encourage you to click through and read it in its entirety.  But finish reading and commenting on today’s articles here first, of course. 😀

Share

Teabuggery Pays

 Posted by at 2:24 am  Politics
May 022010
 

Someday the Teabaggers will realize what dupes they are.  Until then, some of America’s most vile villains will rake in the dough.

Teabaggers-No Whatever your opinion is of the Tea Party movement, one thing is blatantly clear: Being a high-profile "leader" of the small-government movement is huge business.

[Yahoo! News] The movement’s popular appeal (according to the mainstream media) stems from grass-roots outrage over the bailout of America’s financial system, the expanded role of government, and the growing deficits. But the Tea Party has also been aggressively promoted by conservative media, political leaders and advocacy groups — and its broad appeal has  blurred the distinctions among the three.

A year into this fledgling political movement’s life, reports are emerging of the huge money being made by Tea Party leaders.

Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck lead the pack of personalities capitalizing on ignorance to earn very easy money, but a few new faces and a few old faces are also getting into the game.

Sarah Palin

Who: Former governor of Alaska, Fox News contributor, author, speaker

1 year Tea Party-generated income: $12 million

 

Glenn Beck

Who: Fox News host, radio host, author, speaker

1 year Tea Party-generated income: $32 million

 

Dick Armey

Who: Former House majority leader, former lobbyist, chairman of FreedomWorks

1 year Tea Party-generated income: $550,000

 

Andrew Breitbart

Who: Web publisher, author, pundit, speaker

1 year Tea Party-generated income: $500,000-plus

 

Fox News

Who: cable news and opinion network

1 year Tea Party-generated income: unknown

 

The "movement" most of us see is a small faction of supposedly well-to-do ignoramuses who are furiously angry about nearly everything and display a unique tendency to reduce complicated issues down to moronically simplistic catch-phrases that are often misspelled but easy to shout. The key point to articulate is that these "real Americans" don’t realize they are being played for fools by their so-called "leaders"… [emphasis original]

Inserted from <The Vile Plutocrat>

I hope that someday these poor fools come to their senses.  Sadly, you can lead a Teabagger to wisdom, but you can’t make him think.

Share
May 022010
 

Tom122007_Painting_Painting I’ve heard that the right wing is trying to compare Obama attending the Correspondents’ Dinner with Crawford Caligula’s fiddling while New Orleans drowned.

First, once we realized that BP had lied about the size and severity of this disaster, ordained in Cheney’s secret meetings with oil company executives, Obama has deployed competent people to deal with the disaster to the maximum extent possible.  Except for a wishy-washy position on offshore drilling, his response has been praiseworthy.

Second, there is nothing that his failure to attend the dinner could have done to lessen the plight of Gulf Coast residents.

I intended to watch, but alas, I was so tired I slept through the whole thing.  Fortunately I found his speech in case you missed it too.

Part One

Part Two

I think Obama was both funny and wise in what he said.

Share
May 022010
 

Yesterday I did laundry and that tired me out, but I did manage to reply to comments and return visits.  Today, I have a huge pile of paperwork and errands to run, so we’ll see what the day brings.

Jig Zone Puzzle:

Today it took me 4:04.  To do it, click here. How did you do?

Short Takes:

From Newshounds: In an interview with Megyn Kelly on America Live Friday (4/30/10), Arizona Governor Jan Brewer discussed the controversial new immigration law she recently signed into effect. First, she complained about her critics who “are trying to create hysteria” against the law. But less than a minute later, Brewer was doing her best to create anti-immigrant hysteria by equating illegal immigration to terrorist attacks.

How do you spell H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E?

From Crooks and Liars: The only mainstream media coverage I saw of the "Showdown on Wall Street" Thursday was on MSNBC’s Dylan Ratigan Show. Possibly everyone else was off covering a gathering of a dozen teabaggers, and could not spare the time to listen to working Americans.

While this story deserves far more coverage than it received, I think it was drowned out by the GOP Gulf Disaster, not Teabuggery.

Cartoon:

Have a great Sunday!

Share

Monthly Report – 5/1/2010

 Posted by at 4:27 am  Blog News
May 012010
 

Our second full month since we moved from Blogger was a good one.  Here are our basic stats:

stats04

And here is our most recent Clustr Map.

Map43010

Our durations are doing well.

Visits duration

Number of visits: 3667 – Average: 386 s

Number of visits

Percent

0s-30s

2448

66.7 %

30s-2mn

354

9.6 %

2mn-5mn

256

6.9 %

5mn-15mn

208

5.6 %

15mn-30mn

67

1.8 %

30mn-1h

96

2.6 %

1h+

228

6.2 %

Unknown

10

0.2 %

And search engines are starting to recognize us.

Links from an Internet Search Engine

 

Stumbleupon (Social Bookmark)

385

527

Google

185

214

Google (Images)

72

73

Yahoo!

21

21

AOL

4

4

– Unknown search engines

2

2

Dogpile

2

2

Windows Live

2

12

Here are our top 12 referrers:

Links from an external page (other web sites except search engines)

 

The least we can do is give some linkage back.

We now have 3,867 links on other sites.

We have 890 posts and 6,223 comments.

Several people have told me that what makes Politics Plus attractive to them is the quality of the comments following the articles.

That’s your fault, so thank you for another good month.  We’re still well below the activity level we used to have, but rebuilding takes time.

Share

Responsibility for the Spill

 Posted by at 4:25 am  Politics
May 012010
 

The genie is out of the bottle.  The oil has started to come ashore.  The damage will be horrific, and the cost, staggering.  While this may seem like I’m pointing fingers and placing blame, that doesn’t matter.  I don’t give a damn whose fault it is.  What is important is assigning responsibility for the costs involves, because unless we do, and demand that the responsible parties pal all costs, direct and indirect, we taxpayers will be saddled with them.

For this first article, I’d like to thank my Facebook friend Diane, who emailed it to me.

BP-greed BP, the global oil giant responsible for the fast-spreading spill in the Gulf of Mexico that will soon make landfall, is no stranger to major accidents.

In fact, the company has found itself at the center of several of the nation’s worst oil and gas–related disasters in the last five years.

In March 2005, a massive explosion ripped through a tower at BP’s refinery in Texas City, Texas, killing 15 workers and injuring 170 others. Investigators later determined that the company had ignored its own protocols on operating the tower, which was filled with gasoline, and that a warning system had been disabled.

Are you a Gulf Coast resident? Do you have direct experience as a laborer, consultant, or contractor on offshore oil rigs? Or insight into how safety and emergency response decisions are made and implemented? Write reporter Abrahm Lustgarten (if needed, you can speak anonymously).

The company pleaded guilty to federal felony charges and was fined more than $50 million by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Almost a year after the refinery explosion, technicians discovered that some 4,800 barrels of oil had spread into the Alaskan snow through a tiny hole in the company’s pipeline in Prudhoe Bay. BP had been warned [1] to check the pipeline in 2002, but hadn’t, according to a report in Fortune. When it did inspect it, four years later, it found that a six-mile length of pipeline was corroded. The company temporarily shut down its operations in Prudhoe Bay, causing one of the largest disruptions in U.S. oil supply in recent history.

BP faced $12 million in fines for a misdemeanor violation of the federal Water Pollution Control Act. A congressional committee determined that BP had ignored opportunities to prevent the spill and that "draconian" cost-saving measures had led to shortcuts in its operation.

Other problems followed. There were more spills in Alaska. And BP was charged with manipulating the market price of propane. In that case, it settled with the U.S. Department of Justice and agreed to pay more than $300 million in fines.

At each step along the way, the company’s executives were contrite.

"This was a preventable incident. … It should be seen as a process failure, a cultural failure and a management failure," John Mogford, then BP’s senior group vice president for safety and operations, said in an April 2006 speech about the lessons learned in Texas City. "It’s not an easy story to tell. BP doesn’t come out of it well."

In a 2006 interview with this reporter after the Prudhoe Bay spill, published in Fortune [2], BP’s chief executive of American operations, Robert Malone, said, "There is no doubt in my mind, what happened may not have broken the law, but it broke our values."

Malone insisted at the time that there was no pattern of mismanagement that increased environmental risk.

"I cannot draw a systemic problem in BP America," he said. "What I’ve seen is refineries and facilities and plants that are operating to the highest level of safety and integrity standards."

Nonetheless, Malone, who spent three decades at BP and was promoted to the CEO of BP America shortly after the Texas refinery blast, promised to increase scrutiny over BP’s operations and invest in environmental and safety measures.

He told Congress that it was imperative BP management learn from its mistakes.

"The public’s faith has been tested recently," he said. "We have fallen short of the high standards we hold for ourselves and the expectations that others have for us."

Time will tell whether the accident that killed 11 workers and sent the Transocean Deepwater Horizon drilling rig — a $500 million platform as wide as a football field — floating to the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico was simply an accident or something else.

Malone, who retired last year, declined to comment for this article. A spokesman for BP was not available for comment.

Families of workers who died in the accident have already filed lawsuits accusing BP of negligence. Congress, as well as the Minerals and Management Service, the federal agency that regulates drilling in the Gulf, were already separately investigating allegations that BP has failed to keep proper documents about how to perform an emergency shutdown [3] of the Atlantis, another Gulf oil platform and one of the largest in the world.

There are also indications that BP and Transocean, the owner of the Deepwater Horizon rig that burned and sank, could have used backup safety gear [4] — a remote acoustic switch that would stanch the flow of oil from a leaking well 5,000 feet underwater — to prevent the massive spill now floating like a slow-motion train wreck toward the Mississippi and Louisiana coastline. The switch isn’t required under U.S. law, but is well-known in the industry and mandated in other parts of the world where BP operates…

Inserted from <Propublica.org>

It’s quite clear that BP has a long track record of maximizing profit while ignoring worker and environmental safety.  The remote acoustic switch that could have prevented this was not used because it costs $500,000, a paltry sum considering the billions they take in.

Another measure of corporate citizenship is it’s choice of subcontractors.  In choosing a subcontractor with a long history of fraud and substandard work would be damning indeed, but that is exactly what they did.

cheneyhallibur An inadequate underwater cement job during the deepwater drilling process is emerging as a potential cause for the devastating oil spill off the Louisiana coast in the Gulf of Mexico.

Officials haven’t said what they think caused the April 20 explosion that led to the sinking two days later of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, owned by Transocean Ltd. But industry speculation points to a process where cement is used to seal cracks in the ocean floor surrounding the tubing through which crude oil flows.

Transocean operated the drilling rig under contract for British oil giant BP Plc., the largest oil producer in the U.S. portion of the gulf and a company with a spotty safety history. Transocean has said the global construction titan Halliburton had just completed "cementing" the 18,000-foot-long well around the time of the explosion.

In a statement Friday, Halliburton confirmed that it was the "cementer" hired for the job and said it had completed its job about 20 hours prior to the explosion.

"The cement slurry design was consistent with that utilized in other similar applications," the company said. It said all procedures had been "in accordance with accepted industry practice approved by our customers."… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <McClatchy DC>

No wonder the Bush Regime gutted drilling regulation.  Cheney was raking it in.

Now, when I refer to BP, I am also including Transocean, Halliburton, and other relevant subcontractors.  They must pay for this, ALL of this.

Some of the costs are quite obvious, namely the costs of attempting to contain the spill and repairing environmental damage.  BP must pay for all.  It must include restoring all the damaged ecosystems to their original undamaged state, not just the cosmetics.

There are other costs that are not so obvious.  Businesses that make their living from tourism, fishing and other Gulf uses will lose their livelihood.  Their employees will have no work.  BP must pay their lost profits and lost wages.

Other businesses who supply directly affected businesses and their workers will suffer in the same way.  BP must pay their lost profits and wages as well., throughout the entire supply chain.

Local, State and Federal governments will lose taxes and fees.  BP must pay for that.

Property values of local residents will decrease.  BP must pay the lost value.

Goods such as shrimp will become more scarce, driving up the costs for consumers.  BP must pay the difference.

Whatever I have missed, BP must pay for that too.

The day slaps on the wrist for corporate criminals must end.  The only way to make corporations take the steps to do business in a responsible manner is to hold them responsible.  If taxpayers bear most of these costs, as we have in the past, there is no incentive for corporations to change their ways.  Only having to pay the full devastating price of the damage they have caused will do that.

Share
May 012010
 

We keep hearing from both parties that we need to face sacrifices or the government will run out of money.  Frankly that’s a lie!

Wealth 2004 1) Social Security, at current rates, is not expected to run short of money before 2037.

2)The simplest way to "fix" Social Security, if you’re worried about a "problem" 27 years in the future, is simply to remove the contribution limit. End of problem. Period. Social Security is not in crisis.

3) The reason politicians want to "fix" Social Security is to increase the SS surplus, so they can use it for other things.

4) Medicare has more serious issues. However the simplest way to fix healthcare in the US is to move single payer, which would reduce healthcare per person by one-third. It has worked for every other country in the history of the world that has done it. It will work for the US. Since we’ve admitted now that everyone deserves health care, and since it’s cheaper, and better, why not use the next round of healthcare to fix Medicare by fixing health care?

The unspoken entitlement is the US military. The US spends about half the entire world’s military budget. There is, actually, no one in the world who can invade or seriously threaten the US in any fashion. (Is Canada going to invade? Mexico?) You can easily slash the military budget in half and still be so far ahead of any possible combination of enemies that it isn’t even close.

And yes, taxes are going to need to go up. Here’s a simple fix—tax all income over 5 million at 90%. It won’t hurt the economy (the best economy in America’s history was back when marginal tax rates were this high in the 50’s and 60’s). It will mean that the rich, who got almost the entire bailout and whose irresponsibility threw the US into its worst economic crisis since the Great Depression will pay for it.

Oh, and change the estate tax to tax 80% of all inheritances over 5 million, too. Remember, dead people don’t need money and 5 million tax free for choosing your parents right is enough of a head start.

There are plenty of other ways to raise money and cut costs. For example, you can put a tax on buying and selling derivatives or you can slap on a carbon tax or you can reform corporate taxes so corporations making billions don’t pay no taxes.

Finally, the bottom line is this. The US owes its money in dollars. The US can print money. The US is not going to run out of money. There may be some inflation but anyone who tries to tell you that the US won’t have enough money to pay SS or Medicare is simply lying to you… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Crooks and Liars>

I see a lot of things here that I have been saying for a long long time.  What this article does not say is the downside of printing money.  If $US are worth less, they will buy less in foreign markets, and foreign goods and labor will cost more.  So we might have a little less STUFF.  But it makes US products and services more competitive.

Share
May 012010
 

Today is International Workers’ Day, so it is fitting that we take a moment to honor those that earn or have earned their keep, rather that prey on our nation from corporate boardrooms.

Yesterday I actually caught up on comments and returning visits.  I hope to do more visiting today.

Jig Zone Puzzle:

Today it took me 4:44.  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Short Takes:

From NY Times: The United States economy has expanded for three quarters in a row, the Commerce Department said on Friday, helped along by consumer spending. Now the question is, Will the jobs follow?

The broadest measure of the overall economy grew at an inflation-adjusted annual rate of 3.2 percent in the first quarter of 2010, the Commerce Department reported. It had expanded 5.6 percent in the fourth quarter of 2009 and 2.2 percent in the third quarter.

Jobs are always the last thing to turn.  This good news indicates that the economy has solidly changed direction from the downward spiral that Republican rule brought us and will again, if we are ever so foolish as to let them return to power.

From Think Progress: Today, the Wall Street Journal reports that the Arizona Department of Education “recently began telling school districts that teachers whose spoken English it deems to be heavily accented or ungrammatical must be removed from classes for students still learning English”.

Students do best when they can identify with the teacher.  I see this in my volunteer work, because being an ex-con that has made it gives me a level of credibility with prisoners and former prisoners that people who have never been there can’t have.  Using that same rationale, who could be better to teach an immigrant than another immigrant?  This is just one more example of rampant GOP racism in Arizona.

Cartoon:

Have a great weekend.

Share