May 192010
 

I’m pleased to learn that the rumors that US presence in Iraq might be extended have turned out to be bogus.

GOP-war Last week, rumors that the U.S. might delay the withdrawal of combat forces from Iraq led to much confusion and concern. These rumors are thankfully not true, and both the U.S. and Iraqi leaderships are going ahead with the agreed upon plan.

There are two approaching deadlines guiding the U.S. withdrawal from Iraq. The first is August 31st of this year, which is a self imposed deadline not included in the bilateral security agreement. The August 31st 2010 deadline requires all combat forces to be out of Iraq, bringing down the number of all troops to less than 50K, and the number of contractors to less than 75K. In addition, all combat operations must end and that will be officially the last day of ‘Operation Iraqi Freedom.’ The second deadline is December 31 2011, which is the end game of the binding bilateral Security Agreement that was signed between the two countries in late 2008. According to this deadline, all remaining troops and contractors must leave the country bringing their number down to ZERO, and all bases and military installations must be shut down and/or handed over to the Iraqi government.

These two deadlines did not appear out of the blue; it took millions of Iraqis and Americans years of hard work to push for this plan. On the Iraqi side, the parliament — the only elected entity in the Iraqi government — managed to take out provisions about permanent military bases from the Bush agreement. Iraqis demonstrated in the streets for months and demanded that their parliament stand up to the Iraqi government and Bush Administration, and they ended up succeeding in changing these provisions. The new agreement that was ratified by the Iraqi parliament prohibits any U.S. military bases or installations beyond 2011. On the American side, millions of Americans demonstrated against the war and occupation, and voted for Obama after he adopted a plan to withdraw all combat forces in 18 months and to withdraw all other forces in accordance to the bilateral Security Agreement.

Within the U.S. peace movement, two equally damaging attitudes dominate: on the one hand, there are those who think Obama will end the war, and therefore they don’t need to do anything about it. And on the other hand, there are those who think the occupation will never end, and therefore it is a lost cause.

I personally stand in the middle. I think the withdrawal plan is good enough because it requires all U.S. armed forces and contractors to leave by the end of next year, but at the same time I don’t think we have enough guarantees that it will become reality. Therefore, I believe we need to do a lot of work to make sure Obama implements the plan as promised… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Alternet>

GW ChickenHawk had big plans.  Conquering Iraq was to put the US in charge of the world’s fourth largest known oil fields and establish permanent military basis to use as a springboard for the conquest of six more nations.  The cost to this nation in killed and maimed troops and in treasure has been horrific.  Yet it pales in comparison to the suffering inflicted on the Iraqi people.

As one who opposed this war from well before the first bomb was dropped, I’m willing to wait for the planned withdrawal to take place, but no longer.

Next, we need to get a set timetable for withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Share

  4 Responses to “Let the Bush/GOP Oil War End on Schedule”

  1. We can’t leave Afghanistan until the revival of the opium crops. Gotta keep the War on Drugs going, too.

  2. I hope this plan sticks to the withdrawal dates – when we leave there will be a civil war that we can do nothing about And what is our purpose for being in Iraq right now? To prevent the inevitable civil war? Ain’t gonna happen and our troops should be out of there in June according to the SOFA agreement that we’ve already violated several times. It’s pointless to keep these troops there past June – we will continue to accomplish nothing after that.

    • Lisa, the only thing we accomplish is that the Bush Regime signed an agreement with the Maliki regime. Bush broke the law by not submitting it to Congress, but Congress funded it, so whether we are obligated is no longer clear. I hope and pray that the absence of a combat role will stop US casualties.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.