One of the GOP’s premiere hypocrites has been acting out a big victim stance over her computer being hacked.
Sarah Palin took the stand Friday in the trial of Former University of Tennessee student David Kernell. Kernell is charged with hacking Palin’s Yahoo! e-mail account while Palin campaigned in the 2008 presidential campaign.
Kernell is facing 50 years in prison over this incident. He would be 72 years old when he gets out of prison. According to the Anchorage Daily News, Palin was asked if she thought the charges against Kernell were excessive:
Palin said, "I don’t know, but I do think there should be consequences for bad behavior."
Hmmm…consequences for BAD BEHAVIOR???
This coming from the Quitter Governor of Alaska who:
- used state resources to relentlessly pursue a family vendetta
- took per diem as governor while sleeping in her own bed
- took her kids at state expense on official State of Alaska business trips
- lashed out at socialized "death panel" health care while her family was covered by socialized "death panel" health care
- enjoyed socialized health care in Canada when she growing up and needed it
- has health care provided to her grandson through Indian Health Services
- advocates abstinence when it never worked for her own family
- family members ignored subpoenas and were found in contempt
and the list goes on and on and on and on and on and on and on….
But…the pinnacle of Palin’s hypocrisy might just be with this trial. "…I do think there should be consequences for bad behavior." Really? What about hers? How about Sarah Palin’s hacking into another state employees’ computer back in 2004? If hacking into someone’s computer is "bad behavior," what were her consequences?
Sarah Palin hacked Randy Ruedrich’s computer to find some dirt on him… [emphasis added]
Inserted from <Huffington Post>
Lest I be accused of diverting, a thinking error to which I have attributed right wing comments on other blogs, let me say that what Kernell allegedly did was wrong. I agree with Palin that there should be consequences for bad behavior. If convicted, he deserves a standard sentence, not inflated over Palin’s notoriety.
However, what’s good for the gooseolini is good for the Mooseolini. Should there not be consequences for her bad behavior as well?