David Frum and I rarely agree on anything, but when I told the truth, the unforgivable sin in GOP circles these days, he was right. It cost him his job.
David Frum, the conservative pundit and former Bush White House speechwriter, has left his perch at the American Enterprise Institute — and some observers wondering whether the move was triggered by his recent criticism of the GOP.
Today, Frum posted on his blog a note he had sent to AEI President Arthur Brooks:
Dear Arthur,
This will memorialize our conversation at lunch today. Effective immediately, my position as a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute is terminated. I appreciate the consideration that delays my emptying of my office until after my return from travel next week. Premises will be vacated no later than April 9.
I have had many fruitful years at the American Enterprise Institute, and I do regret this abrupt and unexpected conclusion of our relationship.
Very truly yours,
David Frum
Frum has lately emerged as perhaps the most prominent internal critic of the modern conservative movement. On Sunday, in a blog post that received widespread attention, he lambasted the Republicans no-compromise strategy on health-care reform, writing "[t]his time, when we went for all the marbles, we ended with none."…
Inserted from <TPM>
Frum is a prominent neocon, and he is certainly no defector to the left. He is an enemy of all who hold progressive values. He is an extreme hawk, a proponent preemptive military attacks, and an authentic GOP torture monger. But not even one such as he is safe from the current GOP extremism. He forgot, just for a moment, to goose step. He is now under the bus. This further illustrates why every Republican in office is one Republican too ,many.
2 Responses to “He Forgot to Goose Step”
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
In a way, it’s even weirder than that. If one reads Frum’s now-famous “Waterloo” posting, it’s clear that he was not arguing against the goals of the right wing. He was arguing that the tactics they’ve been using to pursue those goals are ineffective and need to be changed. Considering that those tactics have just led the right wing to an “abject and irreversible defeat”, as he put it, in the HCR battle, the truth of this seems indisputable. Yet they ostracize him rather than addressing his points.
If an army which has just lost a major battle can’t even dare to discuss whether it needs to change its tactics, it’s really in trouble.
You’re exactly correct, Infidel. The point was that he is obviously one of them, but they have their heads so sphinctered that they refuse to acknowledge the obvious correctness of what he said.