I kept running into the story of Lehman Brothers during my morning research, and the more I learned, the more I asked myself this question.
On top of everything Lehman Brothers did before it collapsed in 2008, nearly toppling the financial system, it now seems that it was aggressively massaging its books. Of course, many colossal bankruptcies involve bad accounting. But a new report on the Lehman collapse, released last week and described in an article in Friday’s Times, would leave anyone dumbstruck by the firm’s audacity — and reminded of the crying need for adult supervision of Wall Street.
The 2,200-page report was written by Anton R. Valukas, a former federal prosecutor who was appointed by the Justice Department as an examiner for the Lehman bankruptcy case. According to the report, Lehman engaged in transactions that let it temporarily shift troubled assets off its books and in so doing, hide its reliance on borrowed money.
The maneuvers, which Mr. Valukas said were “materially misleading,” made the firm appear healthier than it was. He wrote that Richard S. Fuld Jr., Lehman’s former chief executive, was “at least grossly negligent,” and that Lehman executives engaged in “actionable balance sheet manipulation.”
At the time, one Lehman executive sent e-mail to a colleague describing the accounting ploys as “basically window dressing.”
Window dressing? Shortly before Lehman’s failure, $50 billion in troubled assets were shed from its balance sheet… [emphasis added]
Inserted from <NY Times>
OK, so far that’s pretty bland stuff: just the normal workings of corporate criminals polluting the financial sand-box created by years of GOP economic policy that Bill Clinton should have interrupted, but didn’t. Then at Crooks and Liars, I discovered this Dylan Rattigan video with Elliot Spitzer:
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Geithner and Bernanke should have known. They had access to the records. Geithner in particular did three separate stress tests on Lehman before they declared bankruptcy. The company failed all three. Geithner turned a blind eye and took no action. Either he is so incompetent that he could not see what was directly under his nose, or he is so corrupt that he saw it clearly and turned a blind eye. In either case, this is more than sufficient cause to remove him as Treasury Secretary. Did he and Bernanke, along with Paulsen and Summers, collude to create a crisis designed to save the Banksters at our expense? I cannot answer that. If so, they all belong in jail. We need those answers.
Why is this so important right now? On Monday, Chris Dodd plans to reveal his Financial Reform bill. I have held off reporting on it until the actual document is available for analysis, but I understand that it places far too much authority in the Federal Reserve and Treasury Secretary. Based on current indications, neither can be trusted.
12 Responses to “Should Geithner and Bernanke Be in Jail?”
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
And Fuld is a bad-tempered, arrogant SOB to boot!
Amen to that, FG.
Yeah, a whole passel of people should have gone to jail, from Geitner/Bernanke right on to the CEO’s and Boards of every bailed out bank, IMHO. Along with every idiot who ever said “but we need to pay them bazillions of dollars to attract and keep talent.”
If that was talent, I’d hate to see what their slackers looked like.
Bee an excellent point. But they were competent enough to do what they wanted to do most: pocket a pants-load of our money.
In jail? I’ve been leaning toward hanging the whole bunch from lampposts.
Beach, were I not so opposed to capital punishment, I’d agree with you. I’m tempted anyway.
I’m with Bee. I worked for E&Y a long time ago and the things those partners let slide was unbelievable.
Lisa, I believe it. I presume it was 100% intentional.
Read the new book out by Michael Lewis The Big Short…
He was on 60 minutes today….great story!
Thanks Tao
TC,
great minds think alike! I just posted on this at Mikes. Sorry I’ve been so belligerent about HCR, the bill we got for my kid set me off and it’s taken almost a week to get my temper under control. But some stress gives me no right to be obnoxious on the site of such a good person and good friend as you. Sorry man.
Apology gratefully accepted, Oso. Had our roles been reversed, I might have snapped at you. It’s behind us.