Nov 192009
 

I was frankly surprised by this ruling, because the Corps of Engineers is immune from suit for damages resulting from building substandard infrastructure like levees that failed.

Katrina-Levee In a ruling that could leave the government open to billions of dollars in claims from Hurricane Katrina victims, a federal judge said late Wednesday that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers had displayed "gross negligence" in failing to maintain a navigation channel — resulting in levee breaches that flooded large swaths of greater New Orleans.

U.S. District Judge Stanwood R. Duval peppered his 156-page decision, issued in New Orleans, with harsh criticism of the Army corps, at one point citing its "insouciance, myopia and shortsightedness" in failing to maintain the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, known locally as MRGO.

For more than 40 years, the judge said, the corps had known that a crucial levee protecting suburban St. Bernard Parish and the Lower 9th Ward neighborhood would be compromised by the deterioration of the channel. The corps had "myriad" ways to address the problem, he wrote, but failed to do so.

Duval awarded a total of $719,000 to a small group of flood victims that sued the government in April 2006.

But according to Pierce O’Donnell, the lead plaintiff’s counsel, roughly 100,000 New Orleans-area residents and businesses who have filed flood-damage claims with the Army corps were now potentially eligible for payment.

In a phone interview, O’Donnell hailed what he called a historic ruling, one that backed the widely held contention in New Orleans that the 2005 catastrophe was not just the fault of Mother Nature.

"The judge agreed with us that Katrina was not a natural disaster," O’Donnell said. "Katrina was a man-made disaster caused by the Army Corps of Engineers."

In a statement Wednesday, the Army corps said only that the opinion was being reviewed by lawyers from the Army and Justice Department. "We have no further comment at this time as the issues involved in the case are still subject to further litigation," the corps said.

At the heart of the case was maintenance and operation of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet.

The channel, which was decommissioned after Katrina, was completed in the 1960s as a shipping shortcut between New Orleans and the Gulf of Mexico. Over the years, the marshy banks of the channel had widened significantly in spots — and long before Katrina hit, experts had warned that the destruction of wetlands could create a funnel effect that would intensify storm surges.

During the trial, attorneys for the government argued that the Army Corps of Engineers was not liable for the post-hurricane flooding because it was immune from civil lawsuits questioning federal flood policy decisions.

But Duval found that such "gross negligence" overrode any immunity claim… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <LA Times>

The basis for the judges decision was that the Mississippi Gulf-River Outlet was not faulty workmanship or maintenance.  It was negligent planning that altered the environment in a way that created the conditions necessary for the flood surge to occur.  This is not over by a long shot.  If the decision survives the Court of Appeals, it will likely end up in SCOTUS.

Share
Nov 192009
 

By the time I got home yesterday I felt completely wiped out, so I didn’t even manage to reply to comments, let alone get any visiting done.  I’ll at least catch up on the comments today.  This antibiotic tends to knock me out.

Faux Noise has been caught in another distortion.  To make it appear that Mooseolini’s book tour is more popular than it is, they tried to pass off video from Snake Oil Sarah’s 2008 campaign rallies as public response to her book tour.  Hat-tip: Think Progress

 

Today’s Jig Zone puzzle took me 6:47.  To do it, Click Here.  How did you do?

Here’s your cartoon:

Have a great day!

Share
Nov 182009
 

Tom Coburn is at it again.

Speaking to reporters last night, the Senate’s top obstructionist, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), said that he would attempt to slow down progress on health care reform by insisting that the 1,000-page-plus health care reform bill be read aloud on the Senate floor. “The American people are going to get to hear this bill read, period,” said Coburn, adding that “he would also block other legislative shortcuts” in an effort to delay the bill, such as requiring “the Senate to use up the entire 30-hour debate period called for after a filibuster has been broken.” According to Roll Call, “earlier this month, Republican leadership aides said Coburn was unlikely to make such a move without the blessing of GOP leaders.”

Inserted from <Think Progress>

This is just a GOP delay while thousands of Americans keep dying from the lack of health care.  Perhaps this GOP scum should remember the Hippocratic oath he took when he graduated from medical school.

I swear to fulfill, to the best of my ability and judgment, this covenant:

I will respect the hard-won scientific gains of those physicians in whose steps I walk, and gladly share such knowledge as is mine with those who are to follow.

I will apply, for the benefit of the sick, all measures [that] are required, avoiding those twin traps of overtreatment and therapeutic nihilism.

I will remember that there is art to medicine as well as science, and that warmth, sympathy, and understanding may outweigh the surgeon’s knife or the chemist’s drug.

I will not be ashamed to say "I know not," nor will I fail to call in my colleagues when the skills of another are needed for a patient’s recovery.

I will respect the privacy of my patients, for their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know. Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty. Above all, I must not play at God.

coburn I will remember that I do not treat a fever chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may affect the person’s family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these related problems, if I am to care adequately for the sick.

I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure.

I will remember that I remain a member of society, with special obligations to all my fellow human beings, those sound of mind and body as well as the infirm.

If I do not violate this oath, may I enjoy life and art, respected while I live and remembered with affection thereafter. May I always act so as to preserve the finest traditions of my calling and may I long experience the joy of healing those who seek my help.

Inserted from <PBS>

The top graphic is a Hippocrates.  The bottom is a hypocrite.  There is no resemblance between Coburn’s oath and his behavior trying to prevent the neediest Americans from having access to health care.  One of the biggest opponents of health care reform is Supply Side Jesus, not the real Jesus who practiced love, tolerance and care for those in need, but the Republican/Religious Right Jesus who practices hate, fear, and greed.  In the opposition to health care reform many roads meet at C Street.  There’s some good news there.

republican_jesus Residents of the C Street Christian fellowship house will no longer benefit from a loophole that had allowed the house’s owners to avoid paying property taxes.

Previously, the house — despite being home to numerous lawmakers — had been tax exempt, because it was classified as a church. That arrangement had allowed the building’s owner, the secretive international Christian organization The Family, to charge significantly below market rents to its residents. In recent year, Senators John Ensign (R-NV), Tom Coburn (R-OK), Sam Brownback (R-KS) and Jim DeMint (R-SC), and Reps. Zach Wamp (R-TN), Bart Stupak (D-MI) and Mike Doyle (D-PA) have all reportedly called C Street home.

Natalie Wilson, a spokeswoman for the Office of Tax and Revenue for Washington D.C., told TPMmuckraker that her office inspected the house this summer. "It was determined that portions of it were being rented out for private residential purposes," she said. As a result, the tax exempt status was partially revoked. Sixty-six percent of the value of the property is now subject to taxation…

Inserted from <TPM>

If they are a church, as they claim, all their political activity has been a violation of the separation clause, so they should lose all tax exemption and have to pay back taxes, with interest and penalties for all the years they have been proselytizing politicians.

Rachel Maddow did a beautiful job of tying it all together.

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

The CBO is about to release its estimate of the latest Senate bill.  As soon as you get that news, camp on your phones please.  We need to get this passed.

Share
Nov 182009
 

I had a hard time believing this one.

It was an encounter one Ozark 10-year-old will likely never forget.

taser Called to a home to help control an allegedly "unruly child," an Ozark police officer was reportedly told by the girl’s mother that he could use the electric weapon to subdue her, according to 40/29 News Arkansas.

However, the girl supposedly kicked the officer in the groin when he approached. "He had no other choice [but to Taser her]," Ozark Police Choief [sic] Jim Noggle reportedly said. "He had to get the child under control."

According to the Associated Press, the officer’s name is Dustin Bradshaw. His aggressive approach to dealing with a child has the girl’s father enraged.

"If you can’t pick the kid up and take her to your car, handcuff her, then I don’t think you need to be an officer," Anthony Medlock reportedly said.

Ozark police argued that had the officer grabbed the girl, he could have hurt her. "If you grab somebody, you can slip an arm out of joint," the police chief added. "They can slip from you and fall on the ground."…

Inserted from <Raw Story>

It seems that almost every month I read a story about the abusive use of a TASER by police, including several fatalities. 

The chief’s defense is absurd.  Shooting thousands of volts of electricity through a ten year old body has to be more dangerous than the possibility of dropping the child, given that the TASER has killed full grown adults.  The mother who gave permission, if the officer is not testilying about that, is equally responsible.  The cop should be fired, branded on his forehead with a scarlet T, and forbidden to work in any phase of law enforcement ever again.

Somehow too many police officers (certainly not all) have gotten the notion that they can use the TASER in any and all circumstances.  Until such time as training can be upgraded sufficiently for officers to respect the TASER’s lethal potential and use it only when appropriate, the weapon should be banned.

Share
Nov 182009
 

The suicide rate among our troops is more than double the national average.  Something is clearly wrong with the mental health services we are providing our troops.

military-suicides Suicides in the U.S. Army will hit a new high this year, a top general said on Tuesday in a disclosure likely to increase concerns about stress on U.S. forces ahead of an expected buildup in Afghanistan.

The findings, released as President Barack Obama inches toward a decision to send up to 40,000 additional troops to Afghanistan, show the number of active-duty suicides so far in 2009 has already matched last year’s record of 140 deaths.

"We are almost certainly going to end the year higher than last year," General Peter Chiarelli, the Army’s vice chief of staff, told a Pentagon briefing.

"This is horrible, and I do not want to downplay the significance of these numbers in any way."

Another 71 soldiers committed suicide after being taken off active duty in 2009 — nearly 25 percent more than the end-year total for 2008. Some had returned home only weeks before taking their own lives.

The figures applied only to the U.S. Army. Data from other branches of the armed services was not immediately available.

Chiarelli cautioned against generalizing about the causes of the suicides, or assuming links to combat stress on forces stretched thin by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

He said the causes were still unclear and noted that roughly a third of the soldiers who took their own lives had never been deployed abroad.

The Army recently revealed that about one in five lower rank soldiers suffered mental health problems like depression.

The latest data and this month’s shooting spree at a base in Fort Hood, Texas attributed to an Army psychiatrist have raised new questions about the effects of combat stress and the state of the military’s mental health system… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Reuters>

If the General releasing the news says not to link the suicide rate to combat stress or forces stretched this, that virtually guarantees that is the first place we should look.  If one third of the cases had never been deployed, would not stress over seeing comrades return as basket cases and knowing they were next raise stress levels?  Morale stinks, largely because our soldiers have been overused in wars of aggression without letup.  They could not even feel safe in the shower.  Furthermore, any health care system that could continue to employ Major Hasan as a psychiatrist as long as they did id broken.  Our troops are too valuable not to fix it, and if the GOP keeps getting in the way, roll over them.

Share
Nov 182009
 

Yesterday I managed to visit quite a few blogs. but do not expect to do so today.  My doctor prescribed me another course of antibiotics.  Unfortunately, it’s a mile walk to and from the pharmacy to get it filled.  I figure I’ll be wiped out by the time I get back home.

Yesterday’s Jig Zone puzzle took me 6:02.  To do it, Click Here.  How did you do?

Here’s your cartoon:

Happy hump day to all!

Share
 Comments Off on Open Thread – 11/18/2009

Tea Party Pawns Punked

 Posted by at 4:18 am  Politics
Nov 172009
 

Every once in a while a story comes along that demonstrates a key truth and, at the same time, is thoroughly entertaining.   This is one of those: On Saturday, a few dozen anti-immigration activists gathered on the steps of the Minnesota State Capitol for a Tea Party, part of the nationwide effort by Americans for Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC). But somehow, one of the counter-protesters, a “concerned citizen from Minneapolis” named “Robert Erickson,” manged to get on the speaking list. His address started with the standard anti-immigrant rhetoric, but then revealed that he was talking about European immigrants. By this time, however, the crowd was in a frenzy and joined him in his chants of “Columbus go home!” and “Europeans out!”:

Let’s send these European immigrants back where they came from! I don’t care if they are Polish, Irish, English, Italian, or Norwegian! European immigrants are responsible for the most violent and heinous crimes in the history of the world, including genocide and slavery! Its time to restore the sovereignty of people native to this land! I want more workplace raids, starting with the big banks downtown… [emphasis original]

Inserted from <Think Progress>
Here’s the video.
 
Hats off to Robert Erikson!  However he got himself on that speakers list, it was an act of pure genius.  The very notion of getting WASPS to demonstrate against their own ilk is absolutely hilarious.  But most important, he demonstrates that these poor lost fools disengaged their brains long ago.  They happily cheer for and scream against whatever is put in front of them.  Their whole demeanor can be described with just one word: Ba-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a!!

Share
Nov 172009
 

Here are the results of our latest poll, one that had lots of participation.

results11-16

F was the most popular choice, as disgruntled progressive combined forces with right wingers who wandered in.  Over all the results were quite even, though, with 81 favorable votes as opposed to 80 unfavorable votes.

Your comments were also quite diverse:

From Jo on November 15, 2009 at 10:02 pm. 

Where is the "change"?

You American folks are too nice, and too trusting.

From Shar on November 14, 2009 at 5:05 pm.

I think Obama is just an African American Bush. No bringing the troops home, no help for foreclosures, lots of help for the wealthy, no single payer health care and no job creation. I think Congress and the President should have to live on the wages of the poor. I don’t think poverty would stay around too long. How anyone who is in their right mind could give Obama anything above a D is living in a different reality than most of us.

From adamondc in reply to Shar on November 15, 2009 at 9:50 pm. 

Clearly, Obama is an ass and does not have a clue on anything representing economics….or anything else for that matter.

From Vigilante on November 14, 2009 at 12:32 pm.

He gets a "B", however his class performance has been sliding of late. On economics, he has to be graded "Pass-fail"; on Health Reform it’s a "C". Afghanistan is his mid-term examination. IMO, there’s only one question on it and only once correct answer. If he doesn’t nail his mid-term, he only get a single term as president.

From ml on November 12, 2009 at 8:47 am. 

Take a deep look at our country – need I say more. He is still on a campaign trail –

From ed subusinowski on November 11, 2009 at 8:41 am. 

obama sucks….. sooner

he is out of office the better the US will be,,,,

From Oso on November 6, 2009 at 6:39 pm. 

gave him an F.Bush policy with a less stupid-looking face. Same F.I.RE bailout policy same pro-war Zionist foreign policy.If I hated Bush for doing why give Obama a pass for the same policy.

From Gwendolyn H. Barry on November 5, 2009 at 8:45 am. 

Ok, it’s working! I gave him a B. Not too shabby!

From Marva on November 4, 2009 at 7:17 pm.

Voted B because he doesn’t sign an executive order to get rid of Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell. He is the Commander in Chief, after all. There are a few other things he’s foot-dragging on in my "liberal" agenda. I try to appreciate the caution and deliberation, but I really wish he’d squash those Re-bug-licans into the dirt. They deserve squashing, and I want to see it.

From Grung_e_Gene on November 4, 2009 at 1:25 pm.

Obama has done an excellent job in the face of the Zealous Fanaticism of the Right. He’d be an Aplus (and one of the Greatest Presidents ever) if he’s able to extricate us from Afghanistan and pass Real Health Care Reform.

From LCMike in reply to Grung_e_Gene on November 4, 2009 at 6:41 pm. 

Oh my God! Misguided is hardly the word– at least on the financial front. Check out the following to see where I come from:

http://dailybail.com/home/the-national-debt-road-trip-video-warning-not-for-the-faint.html

From Kevin on November 4, 2009 at 9:41 am. 

I think Obama has done well, and I do not believe McCain, or any other candidate offered any better suggestions for the economy. I agree with Obama’s diplomacy with the remainder of the world and I voted a B only because of the hesitance to tackle some Bush administration policies that have held over…

From adamondc in reply to Kevin on November 15, 2009 at 9:31 pm. 

If you think Obama hads done well, you have your head up your ass.

From LCMike on November 4, 2009 at 6:48 am. 

How anyone could think Obama and his financial team has done an "A" or "B" job is beyond me. With the dollar tanking towards zero… soon..and perhaps sooner… we will sink into the quick sand of hell. Meanwhile, Obama continues to campaign daily while the Congress does their thing. Ugh!

From rjs on November 3, 2009 at 10:34 am. 

im the F; we may as well have bush III

From Bush III in reply to rjs on November 10, 2009 at 7:01 am. 

Thanks for your vote b###h.

From TomCat on November 2, 2009 at 9:52 am. 

Not sure what happened. I reset the votes to zero. Please vote again.

From Gwendolyn H. Barry on November 2, 2009 at 8:34 am. 

ah, ditto the above comment…

From Marie (themom) on November 2, 2009 at 8:22 am. 

Hey, I voted "B". The poll shows 2 votes for "F". That’s not my vote.

Would you like to discuss how you voted and why?  I voted C.  While Obama has started to restore America in the eyes of the world and provided a magnificent contrast to the foreign policy of the Bush/GOP regime and started move toward much needed reform in health care, energy, and finance, he has been far too slow to keep his promises on human rights, transparency and open government.  He has appointed too many advisers from the neoconservative and neoliberal camps and far too few progressives.  He has refused to hold the GOP criminals accountable for their behavior.  He has been far to solicitous of the right and far to respectful to the Repiglicans, who have opposed and undermined him at every opportunity.  He has virtually ignored his base, the people that put him in power by donating in the face of hunger and working our asses off to put him in office and provide him strong majorities in Congress.  With all that said, I could not rate him below a C, because every time I think of where we might be if McConJob and Mooseolini had won, I cringe.

There is a new poll up on Afghanistan.  Enjoy!

Share